Is Trump's re-signed immigration ban stricter on the immigration review of refugees?

It is reported that the 120-day temporary travel ban imposed by the US government on most refugees will expire on Tuesday local time. According to this new regulation, the United States will set a ceiling of 45,000 refugees. The upper limit of the Obama administration last year was 1 10000.

How many times has it been changed this year?

It is understood that Trump signed an entry restriction order at the end of 5438+ 10 this year, demanding that citizens of Iran, Sudan, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Yemen and Iraq be temporarily banned from entering the country, triggering a wave of protests across the United States; In March this year, the second edition of the restriction order was signed, which removed Iraq from the restricted entry list.

These two restrictions were quickly frozen by the U.S. Federal District Court and the Circuit Court of Appeals after promulgation. To this end, the Trump administration also applied to the Federal Supreme Court to overturn the relevant ruling. On September 24, Trump signed the third edition of the entry restriction order, prohibiting citizens of Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad, North Korea and some Venezuelan government officials from entering the United States.

Do we still need to sign a new ban?

With the arrival of the deadline for the immigration ban, Trump is expected to sign a document to start the process of allowing refugees to return to the United States as a new guideline for US immigration policy.

Although the US courts have caused a series of setbacks to the implementation of the Trump administration's travel ban, which has prevented travelers from most Muslim countries, the Federal Supreme Court was lenient with the Trump administration's refugee policy last month, that is, the travel ban was only allowed to be implemented until the deadline of 10. In addition, after the Trump administration announced the third edition of the travel ban, the US Federal Supreme Court conducted an oral debate on lifting the travel ban, but did not make any final ruling on the legality review of visa entry or refugee restrictions.