Job Recruitment Website - Ranking of immigration countries - Will the migration of the rich lead to the loss of wealth?
Will the migration of the rich lead to the loss of wealth?
Why are these people going? This is a problem that puzzles our society. In fact, quite a few people are among them and don't want to leave. An immigrant is nothing but a naked official. His wife and children's property have been transferred abroad, and he is still working hard at home. This phenomenon is not limited to officials, entrepreneurs and actors. Excuse me, there are some popular A-list actors with foreign nationality. How many Hollywood actors are there? I don't have a foreign passport, so I hang out in China as usual. Some of them don't even have passports from developed countries, but even Thai passports seem necessary. Many Sri Lankan-born and raised entrepreneurs start businesses and live in China. Many people have no experience of living abroad, at least not in foreign languages. They went abroad and their whole family moved, which not only means the end of life, but also means the end of the process of making money. From then on, they can only live alone in a foreign land. For people who are used to domestic life, the beauty of mountains and waters abroad has nothing to do with their beauty of water. They just mean loneliness and boredom.
I don't want to go, but I have to. The reason behind it is unrealistic. In ancient China, rich people, people with status, even high officials, and even relatives of the country, all lost their property, including marriage, in the political struggle as long as the situation changed. Anyone's life and property are unrealistic legal protection. "The humble room is empty, the bed is full, the grass is withered, and the dancers are people." The scene depicted by "Song" in A Dream of Red Mansions is actually the harsh reality of society. Strictly speaking, despite the property law, this situation will not be erased from human mind. Rich, famous and entitled to real security. In simple English, they are not practical. Even if some people are powerful, they are still not sure whether they will be treated fairly by the law once something happens to them. Some people say that these people may not be right to vote with their feet. At least there are quite a few. They are just looking for a practical guarantee. Their behavior is not so much voting as buying insurance.
Needless to say, these ideas at this stage, China's elite immigrants. No matter which country, the loss of elites does not mean the blessing of the land, but the only way to curb this immigration tide is to give them institutional and legal protection and make them feel safe. A decline in enthusiasm
According to "20 1 1 China Private Wealth Report" jointly issued by China Merchants Bank and Bain Consultants, China tycoons with personal investable assets exceeding 10 trillion yuan invest in domestic real estate. According to the report, nearly 60% of the mainland rich interviewed have completed investment immigration or have considered this behavior among the rich, such as personal investable assets exceeding 1 10,000 yuan. About 27% people have completed investment immigration, and the proportion of investment immigrants under consideration is as high as 47%.
Overseas themes have increased significantly. In recent years, the number of rich immigrants in China has been discussed by the media, not once or twice, and they are really not only the clear will of the rich to be investigated, but also supported by various data. For example, Caixin data: In recent years, China's personal overseas assets have increased rapidly from 20 10 in 2008, with an average compound annual growth rate of nearly 100%. The cumulative number of investment immigrants from China is in the United States, with a compound annual growth rate of 73% in the last five years.
Why are rich people interested in emigrating? Give the rich various reasons, but together, in fact, in a word: in China, the rich have money, but money can't buy many things, so they immigrate.
If you don't immigrate and live in the same place as the poor in the world, then the rich must be regarded as "unhappy" to share differences, such as food safety. Last year, the American "International Herald" article asked the old lady who immigrated to Canada if she wanted to emigrate overseas. Her answer was "Sanlu". There is also the so-called social "hatred of the rich, the gap between rich and poor countries is gradually widening, the poor complain, the rich are afraid, and the rich immigrants are afraid." This sounds alarmist, but it is full of public hatred. Once boiling, who can predict the energy?
More importantly, the rich should indeed bear part of the responsibility for the unfair transfer of wealth. The so-called "original sin" of wealth is not a ridiculous conversation, and it is difficult to stop. Many rich people can't live without doing evil in a bad market environment. This is evil, but if they continue to do evil, they may win the destruction of wealth at any time. If a strong man breaks his wrist, it is better to go to the country and leave home to wash it again.
Of course, if only a few people are the fate of the rich, it is not a big problem. Ensuring the freedom of legal wealth transfer is also an appropriate legal and social issue, but it has become a trend and its negative impact, but it should not be ignored. The trend of rich immigrants not only means the double loss of elite and wealth, but also may have a demonstration effect and have a negative impact on the rest of society.
The deeper worry is that the migration of the rich with wealth not only means a weak sense of national identity, but also shirks social responsibility. No matter whether the rich have reasonable reasons to be happy or not, bachelors will get married sooner or later, whether they are happy or unhappy. It is still difficult to hide the fact that their income is wealth in this society, but they are "heartless" and refuse to leave and give back to society. They are dissatisfied with this society, but they lack civic spirit and refuse to turn their dissatisfaction into positive actions beneficial to society. Many people even have the idea of "I don't care about the flood" and want to engage in many immigrants. As a result, rich people immigrated there, leaving a knot in society: they were dissatisfied with the left-wing society, and their rich feelings for society, such as folk hatred, drove them to leave, but their irresponsible departure has always inspired more hatred ... The rich insisted on not creating worse local communities (including the poor).
- Related articles
- Requirements of British investment immigrants
- What are the rewards for the excellent trophy of World Awakening?
- What is a Japanese ronin?
- How far is it from Beitun in Xinjiang to Chuxiong in Yunnan?
- Can't speak English, have no skills? Can 90,000 people go to Britain by general education?
- How to advertise immigrants
- The most livable country in the world, ranking first is beyond the imagination of many people. who is it?
- 0935-5 120538 attribution
- What are the advantages of studying in America?
- Does anyone know the history of "Huguang filling Sichuan"?