Unscramble the immigration schedule of unskilled professionals in the new fiscal year of the United States from 2065438 to 2004 10.

Retrograde analysis of immigration policy changes;

In the history of EB-3 in the United States, there have been eight times of schedule retrogression. The time and length of retrogression are:1July, 992, with retrogression of 3 years and 4 months; 1993 10 months, two months back; 65438+May 0994 retrogression 1 day (negligible); 1994 1 1 month, 7 days backward (or negligible); 1997 65438+ February, four years back; April 2000, three years and two months later; 1 month in 2005, and 1 1 month in the next two years; The latest one, 20 14 released by the State Council a few days ago, is six years behind. The above data have the following rules: the time interval of schedule retrogression is getting longer and longer, but the length of schedule retrogression is irregular.

In fact, scheduling is a means for immigrants to control the number of applicants. Why? Considering from several aspects: the manpower of the immigration bureau and the number of applicants, the United States is a country that stresses the legal system and flaunts "natural human rights", so it can't amend the immigration bill at will, and can only use the schedule announcement to psychologically prevent a large number of applicants from pouring in.

Therefore, the backward scheduling phase is beneficial to the applicant for the following reasons.

1. The Immigration Bureau can use this gap to step up the handling of previously arranged cases.

2. Some applicants will quit and speed up the process.

3. Historical data show that every retrogressive year will usher in rapid progress after a while, even without scheduling.

4. Employers in the United States can't wait for labor demand, but all powerful companies in the United States that can be EB-3 employers are big taxpayers. Do you think the ruling party will offend these people in a country that pays taxes and votes? Once there is a labor shortage in the United States, the Immigration Bureau will be forced by American employers to reopen the quota to speed up the progress.

Generally speaking, the retrogression of scheduling shows that it looks like a challenge, but it is actually an opportunity. The retrogression of the schedule just shows that there are many people applying for EB3 at present, as well as in China. When an industry is not gradual, the government will take corresponding measures to make it return to normal, which is called macro-control. The retrogression of dispatching is actually the American version of macro-control. Whether it is an opportunity or a challenge depends on whether you have a sharp eye to see it.