How to evaluate the success of China 500-ton rocket liquid oxygen kerosene engine experiment?

There is no way to evaluate it. This is just the successful development of an air pump. I don't know who changed it, but it became a successful engine development. There are so many parts in this engine, one is successful today and the other is successful tomorrow, but it can't be completed. For example, 20 10, Long March 5 14,11June and September. Recently, it was said that it was changed to 1 1, and it has been closed for more than two years. The main reason is that the engine can't pass. The data show that the hydrogen-oxygen engine has only 70 tons of thrust. Like Tiangong-2, there was no technological breakthrough, but now there is. Tiangong-2 carrier rocket 2f still uses nitrogen tetroxide, a highly toxic fuel. The main key of a country's space capability lies in its carrying capacity. More than 90% of the rocket's level lies in its engine technology. When your rocket has a carrying capacity of 4 tons in low Earth orbit, you can send people into space. If your rocket has the capability of 8 tons of low Earth orbit, it will have the capability of a micro space station. If the rocket has a carrying capacity of 25 tons of Leo, it will be able to build a small space station of about 65,438+000 tons. Leo100t rocket has the ability to land on the moon. The level of the rocket determines what you can do in the space field. The only blockbuster in these years is Long March 5, not Sky 1 2 at all. For the Long March 5 Tiangong 1 and No.2, it is not a technical difficulty at all. Rockets rely on engines, which lag behind Japan and ESA in engine technology. Rockets like Japan and Europe have the ability to launch space stations, but with the International Space Station, there is no need to engage in manned spaceflight and space stations, and there is still a lack of money. In fact, after Japan and Europe, why can a private company in the United States engage in aerospace? Because this company has the technology of rocket engine, other technical difficulties are nothing. Two months later, the Long March 5 was launched with a bunch of 120-ton first-class rockets tied together with liquid oxygen kerosene engines. The 500-ton liquid oxygen kerosene engine will not come out for five to 10 years. Although China's space level is advancing step by step, it is necessary to know its own capabilities objectively. It is hoped that China will make a substantial breakthrough in the large thrust hydrogen-oxygen engine as soon as possible.

There is no way to evaluate it. This is just the successful development of an air pump. I don't know who changed it, but it became a successful engine development. There are so many parts in this engine, one is successful today and the other is successful tomorrow, but it can't be completed. For example, the Long March 5, 14, 20 10, 16, September. Recently, it was said that it was changed to 1 1, and it has been closed for more than two years. The main reason is that the engine can't pass. The data show that the hydrogen-oxygen engine has only 70 tons of thrust. Like Tiangong-2, there was no technological breakthrough, but now there is. Tiangong-2 carrier rocket 2f still uses nitrogen tetroxide, a highly toxic fuel. The main key of a country's space capability lies in its carrying capacity. More than 90% of the rocket's level lies in its engine technology. When your rocket has a carrying capacity of 4 tons in low Earth orbit, you can send people into space. If your rocket has the capability of 8 tons of low Earth orbit, it will have the capability of a micro space station. If the rocket has a carrying capacity of 25 tons of Leo, it will be able to build a small space station of about 65,438+000 tons. Leo100t rocket has the ability to land on the moon. The level of the rocket determines what you can do in the space field. The only blockbuster in these years is Long March 5, not Sky 1 2 at all. For the Long March 5 Tiangong 1 and No.2, it is not a technical difficulty at all. Rockets rely on engines, which lag behind Japan and ESA in engine technology. Rockets like Japan and Europe have the ability to launch space stations, but with the International Space Station, there is no need to engage in manned spaceflight and space stations, and there is still a lack of money. In fact, after Japan and Europe, why can a private company in the United States engage in aerospace? Because this company has the technology of rocket engine, other technical difficulties are nothing. Two months later, the Long March 5 was launched with a bunch of 120-ton first-class rockets tied together with liquid oxygen kerosene engines. The 500-ton liquid oxygen kerosene engine will not come out for five to 10 years. Although China's space level is advancing step by step, it is necessary to know its own capabilities objectively. It is hoped that China will make a substantial breakthrough in the large thrust hydrogen-oxygen engine as soon as possible.