Why is it that the disintegration of the Soviet Union laid a curse at the beginning of the founding of the Soviet Union?

There are different opinions about the reasons for the disintegration of the Soviet Union. Some people say Gorbachev and Yeltsin are the culprits. Some people say that the United States and other western countries have joined forces to obstruct sanctions. Some people say that the financial collapse and peaceful evolution in the West are the reasons. These statements seem to have some truth, and the reasons for the disintegration of the Soviet Union are analyzed from different aspects. But from the perspective of the Soviet Union itself, these can only be regarded as the external causes of the disintegration of the Soviet Union, and the Soviet Union's entry into the American system is the internal cause of the disintegration of the Soviet Union. In other words, the fundamental reason for the disintegration of the Soviet Union is its improper handling of ethnic relations. The Soviet Union's policies made all ethnic groups dissatisfied, and the leaders of all ethnic groups disintegrated the Soviet Union together.

1、

At the beginning of the founding of the Soviet Union, it chose to join the system of * * * and China. Actually, it's just as well. The key point is that the countries that join are basically composed of one nation. In other words, one ethnic group joins the Republic of China. 15 * * and countries are divided by ethnic groups rather than economy or geography, that is, national identity determines the division of countries, and a cultural ethnic group is a country, which makes ethnic groups and politics highly integrated. The establishment of this system has laid a hidden danger for the future disintegration.

As we all know, the United States is a multi-ethnic country, and the nationalities are much more complicated than the Soviet Union. However, the United States is not divided like the Soviet Union. Every state in the United States has different ethnic groups, not a single ethnic group. They are politically equal. There is no state where blacks are in power, and there is no state where whites are in charge. Moreover, the States are roughly the same size, and the strength gap is not too big. In other words, the gap between states in the United States is smaller than that in the Soviet Union, and it is divided by regions rather than ethnic groups.

The Soviet Union is very different. The participating countries are 15, big or small, and the difference is too great. For example, Russia accounts for three quarters of the entire Soviet Union, and its population is half that of the entire Soviet Union. Of course, its strength is far greater than that of other participating countries. However, such a big Russia actually enjoys the same rights as the 14 small countries that have joined the United States. States in the United States not only have little difference in strength, but also arrange the number of members of the House of Representatives according to the population of each state. But such a big Russia has no advantage under the Soviet system, which is why Russians want to disintegrate the Soviet Union more in the 1990s, because there are many unreasonable and unfair reasons.

There is another problem when the Soviet Union joined the Republic, that is, everyone has everything. A country should have everything, and it is already a country. The single nationality and culture naturally encourage their desire for independence. They will seek independence as long as conditions are ripe.

2、

As mentioned above, Russia has absolute advantages in size, population and strength, but it can only be on an equal footing with other countries that have joined the * * *, and Russians are naturally very dissatisfied. Coupled with some unequal policies of the Soviet Union, because the Soviet high-level officials considered the problem from the overall situation to solve the contradictions such as unbalanced development, they used administrative orders to make a large number of transfer payments, so that Russians constantly sacrificed their own interests to meet the needs of other nationalities.

In order to solve the problem of unbalanced development and make backward countries quickly catch up with the pace of Russian modernization, the Soviet Union began to increase its support for backward ethnic areas in the 1930s. The main way is financial transfer payment, that is, using Russian money to support the development of other countries. For example, during the first five-year plan period, the Soviet Union's investment in fixed assets increased nearly three times, but due to transfer payments, the most developed Russia increased less than two times, while the backward four Central Asian countries increased nearly five times and Kazakhstan more than five times. Judging from this figure, it is enough to explain the degree of government investment in backward areas.

The Soviet Union also immigrated a large number of Russians to backward ethnic areas to help them develop. From 1928 to 1936, nearly 2 million Russians immigrated to Central Asia to help the local development. During World War II, 25 million Russians moved to Central Asia, Urals and Siberia with their enterprises. Of course, Russians are reluctant to provide such huge support and transfer payments.

It can be seen that the greater the support of the Soviet Union, the greater the sacrifice of the Russians. In the long run, it will not only make Russians have opinions, but also limit Russia's development, because Russia's money has been transferred in large quantities, like 1988, when Russia's industrial and agricultural profits of 6 1% were taken away. In this way, under the Soviet system, Russians became a piece of fat slaughtered by the Soviet government.

3、

However, although the Soviet Union used Russian money to give strong support to other countries, especially Central Asia, it was not grateful but hostile. On the contrary, Central Asian countries think that the Soviet Union regards them as raw materials, even as colonies, and that the Soviet Union's help is only to snatch their resources.

The long-term support of the Soviet Union has also helped these ethnic groups develop a lazy mentality, feeling that they can live with the help of the Soviet Union, becoming more and more lazy and enterprising, which has also led to a growing gap between these regions and Russia, which has forced the Soviet Union to make greater transfer payments, thus creating a vicious circle and further intensifying the contradiction between Russia and other countries that have joined the * * *.

One nation has joined the Republic of * * *, and the highly autonomous system, coupled with huge transfer payments, has made it impossible for this nation to endure such a bad ethnic policy any longer. Finally, the long-resented generate came out in the 1990s. The Baltic countries took the lead in raising the banner of independence, followed by the Central Asian countries. Finally, the Russian Federation adopted the declaration of sovereignty by an overwhelming majority, followed by Ukraine, Belarus and other countries.

At that time, it was not too much to describe the disintegration of the Soviet Union as a popular aspiration. The party has no objection, the country has no struggle and the people have no response. Russians, in particular, almost no one objected, no one regretted, no one lamented, but cheered and greeted the disintegration of the Soviet Union. Now Russians have some regrets about the disintegration of the Soviet Union, and it is obviously unfair to shift the responsibility of disintegration entirely to the West, because the ethnic problems that led to the disintegration of the Soviet Union have nothing to do with the West, but a series of wrong policies of the Soviet Union. In fact, you can't blame others!

The ethnic problems in the Soviet Union have already buried hidden dangers when Lenin established the Soviet Union, and Lenin's ideal national alliance based on ethnic equality has inherent defects. Lenin's successors, especially Stalin, did not seriously solve this national problem, but did a lot of things that hurt national feelings and national unity. In the end, the Soviet Union disintegrated peacefully with little struggle!