Which is better, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology or Milan Institute of Technology?

Someone who went to both schools will tell you the truth.

First of all, you didn't say major, but according to the probability, I will directly default that you are a design major. If you are majoring in architecture, computer science or IT, then my suggestions are only for reference, and have no guiding significance, because in Australia, these two majors (architecture and IT) are immigration majors that can be graded, so as long as you have good English and can find a job, you can stay. Of course, some people may have more ambitious goals, such as going to the United States (not that life in the United States is better than in Australia and Europe, but that many top companies in the industry are in the United States). I have a friend who went to the United States from Australia and now lives in Google (IT major) in Silicon Valley. Or some people just don't like foreign countries, especially the half-dead Internet industry in Australia and Europe, so they want to go back to China and join a big factory (only applicable to IT majors). So the two schools are actually not bad. You value ranking more, you value RMIT more, but the most important thing is what you finally learned, because in my observation, architecture and IT will ultimately rely on hard-core skills. Take architecture as an example. To be honest, it's getting harder and harder to find a good job these years. It may be the relationship between supply and demand. I don't want to talk more about construction so as not to appear that I am carrying contraband. After all, it may be an old tradition that architecture and design despise each other (although both schools rank design above architecture, people in the school of architecture are particularly prone to feel that they are the sons of the school and talented people), although it is really difficult for them to find a job.

Ok, that's the end of bb. Let's start with the design major (whether it's your interaction, communication or service design). If you only look at the ranking, you think ranking is the most important, and ranking is the most helpful for your future career planning (such as entering a big factory). Then Millie should have an advantage over RMIT, at least a little. After all, as long as Millie's major is not special water, entering a big factory is like a guarantee (to avoid misunderstanding, the big factory here needs to be defined). If you only think that the big factory is Bat or AT doesn't have B, then you may need to work harder, because your requirements for yourself must be not low, but if you are only the leading enterprise in the Internet (including IOT) sub-sectors and service industries, then it really means security). However, we should not be so arbitrary. After all, RMIT has made great efforts to reform since 20 17, and the school of design has been separated from the original school of architecture and design. The school's right to speak and the resources and facilities that can be mobilized should be greater than ours at that time, so now we should not feel that the school building has any priority in occupying facilities. Therefore, the recognition of RMIT's design specialty in domestic big factories should also be higher and higher. But having said that, let's get to the point. Do you really want to learn something or do you want a stepping stone? What I can tell you clearly is that RMIT's advantages in at least hardware and physical resources are absolutely second to none in terms of service and support for students, because Australian schools are rich. . After all, everyone pays so much tuition every year, and the school really invests a lot of money. The overall facilities of the school are a disgrace to most public schools in Europe. Rice is really a book, the equipment is old and the resources are very tight. It's not like in RMIT, when you want to do something, you just do it in the workshop. You just want to go to laser cutting, and you just want to do CNC and water cutting earlier. Printing support in and around the school is also rich and the price is transparent. In the studio, one teacher can teach several students, so everyone has enough guidance time, and the homework items are personal, so you are free.

Milli is really short of facilities. The campus is full of people. In class, one or several teachers face nearly 100 students, all of which are group projects. Teamwork can kill you half-dead. sb members can successfully throw an interesting topic every time, or choose a ridiculous white left topic, which is simply performance art, not to mention that some Italians can only say "I am Italian/I am an undergraduate in this school." I know what the professor likes "not to mention some Latin Americans/Turks and even Iranians". China is a third world/Asians don't understand the aesthetics/tastes of us Europeans (yes, they think they are Europeans). . Let's just say, before I went to Rice, I basically told people that "China people like to hold groups and speak Chinese, so don't blend in, stay away from China students, and don't just team up with their own people after going." After going to the rice, my opinion is that "teaming up with China people is so fucking smooth, it saves a lot of time and wastes it on sb, so let them play by themselves. Teachers give low marks to China people, and Lao Tzu and his own people give low marks. At the end of each semester, studio is basically an endless queue, and groups of people are waiting to review with the teacher. One day, the Italian speaker will have an advantage over you, because the teacher's English is not good. Moreover, Italy is not a multicultural immigrant country, and the international students are actually very stable: many come from Latin America and Turkey. People in these countries have many problems. They think their country is better than China. I don't know where it is, but some teachers have great prejudice against China people. So to be honest, in Millie, the sb level of teachers and classmates around you is much higher than that of Australia. Although Australia is so anti-China in the news (actually anti-China in politics), it is unlikely to be personal, especially the organized anti-China, anti-China and anti-bb China. Compared with Australians, some teachers in Italy and southern Europe and some idiots in Latin America, Turkey and Iran are simply ignorant ordinary citizens. The description of "third world countries" has never been heard in Australia before, but it is often mentioned after studying in Italy. Although Milan, especially around Mile Bovisa, is as shabby as South American countries in the third world, and law and order has been dumped by China and Australia for dozens of streets, it is a hot potato in the eyes of those Latin people. It's hard for you to explain the truth to this group of people, because Millie's students and teachers' horizons are definitely not comparable to those of a more open immigrant country and a real international student school. The Europeans I have met, whether they come to RMIT for exchange every year or Millie goes to Australia for exchange, all come to Australia as if they were in a new world paradise. The only advantage in Mili is that tuition fees plummet every year. Compared with the tuition fee of more than $30,000 a year in Australia, there is only a "registration fee" of € 3,900, and there are many people in bonus hunter who don't need your money to apply for poverty relief, and there are also several yuan of food subsidies and accommodation subsidies every day. Anyway, I have nothing to study in this area. To be fair, I can't ask others. Everyone has their own choices and consequences or consequences of behavior patterns. I personally believe in the law of conservation of character. There is no need to overdraw my character, I am confident in front of Italian sb. I don't study on your charity, but I have a clear conscience. I'm here to learn how to stimulate consumption. I am a master, and your poor service is a matter of your professional level.

Ok, bb has saved so much. To sum up, if you really want to learn something, practice more and pay attention to quality, choose Australia! First-class prices and first-class goods make you feel comfortable. Maybe you went to Australia, saw the urban environment, natural scenery and cultural atmosphere there, and had new ideas. You may want to start a new life, but you may not know it. There are always ways and opportunities. Why are there many anti-thieves in Australia? It's because some people find the treasure and feel that they want to pretend to be poor relatives in China.

If you only value the ranking and the reputation of domestic manufacturers, and want to save some money for your family to go abroad to see Europe, the price/performance ratio of rice grains is good. But you need a good attitude, learn not to talk to summer insects and learn not to lick foreign dogs with some compatriots. (You don't know, sometimes the most hurtful thing is that people around you choose to join when they clearly feel that something is wrong, or people are determined to pretend to be foreign guests and European aristocrats, and their teeth are broken. They should also lie to people at home and say that they are doing well. Don't be too sensitive. Foreigners are very nice. . This can't help the mud on the wall, which really makes people angry and funny. Be firm and think more. If you are really hard-core, in fact, the doors of many other European countries are open to you after graduation, because in the final analysis, your language communication skills can help you find good jobs in some good European countries (in fact, according to the quality of life, you will at most draw with Australia. After all, Australia is a lucky country, and it is really not the "village" we joked about. If it is not good, you can go back to China and go to a big factory.