Why has Russia not been recognized by the West?

Clausewitz thought that Poles were Tatars, but he didn't say that Russians were Tatars. But Russia does have a sense of insecurity and is not recognized. This feeling drives them to pursue territorial expansion, but they don't pursue friends and don't believe in so-called friends. As long as it is firmly in hand, it is safe, so is territorial expansion, and so is foreign relations. Because I don't trust him, I can only cling to him, so my little brothers in Eastern Europe finally left him, and the countries of the former Soviet Union also left him. All Russia can do is fight. Poland, Czech Republic, Ukraine and Georgia are the same. The more they hate, the more they distrust each other.

There are more than 100 ethnic groups in Russia or the far Soviet Union, among which the ethnic groups with a big gap are several ethnic groups in Central Asia, such as Kazak, Siberian Tatar and Mongolia, and the Nordic and Baltic people in western Europe are different from Ukraine and Slavs in the south. The pedigree of Russian residents is far more complicated than that of western Europe, and many historical celebrities are very different from today's Russians. For example, the famous poet Pushkin has black blood. Kalashnikov, a famous gun designer, is Kazakh and belongs to the Central Asian race. During the Soviet period, the boundaries between ethnic groups were much smaller, resulting in many mixed-races. After the disintegration, it was naturally much less.

Cultural differences in Europe

The real reason why Russia is far away from the West can be summarized as three points:

1. Ideological contradiction

Deep-rooted ideology, bourgeoisie and capitalism, the bosses of the two camps, were sworn enemies after the end of World War II, and they always wanted to stab each other to death until one side disintegrated. Imagine that the government is hostile, then the long-term national education will certainly give birth to their national ideological hostility, and until now they are still a thorn in each other's side! Although after the disintegration of the Soviet Union, Russia seems to be a little bourgeois. It stands to reason that the American people should be able to accept Russia, but it doesn't, so it also shows how deeply rooted it is.

Western propaganda has always called * * * productism? Demon? But this is also a superficial reason. The American government actually wants to put the whole world on its own chessboard and listen to his command. Although the Soviet Union disintegrated and gave up capitalism, it was not completely at the mercy of the United States. Russia in particular still regrets its disintegration. This is a disobedient, huge country with certain technical strength, which is quite scary. In the history of Europe after the Roman Empire, Tsarist Russia has always been the main participant in European civilization. It is not said that Russian civilization is closely related to European civilization, including the alliance with Prussia (the predecessor of Germany), the Holy Roman Empire (the predecessor of Austria) and Britain, fighting France * * * and France (the predecessor of France) five times, and finally driving out Napoleon. Russia is one of the founders of the structure and constitution of the western world today.

But Russia is an Asian country and an Asian value system. Democracy cannot blossom and bear fruit on the soil of dictatorship. The western way is not suitable for East Asian countries with traditional Confucian cultural value system, nor for Russia, which can reveal the dictatorial spirit in their bones. From romanov to the Soviet Union to Russia, dictatorship and centralization are the beliefs of Russians. Such a country biased towards Asia is doomed to be unable to integrate with those people in Europe who think they are democratic, equal and free? High-end countries go to the middle end.

Values are different. Since ancient times, European civilization has finally arrived in Russia. The king of Russia used to be German, but it was useless. Others just look down on Slavs! Can't, after all, the lack of local civilization, modern production practices! I thought it was a more advanced civilization than capitalism, but the values were so terrible that Europe was scared! So even though Russia gave up production and became an oligarch, it drifted away from the West!

During the Soviet period, there was opposition between the Soviet Union and the West because of ideological contradictions.

Second: religious contradictions

The difference is that the Russian czar failed to catch up with the Renaissance and the Enlightenment! Religion is more complicated. The difference between the Orthodox Church and the Catholic Church is that the former looks at ecumenical patriarch in Constantinople, while the latter looks at the Pope in Rome. Catholicism is the biblical interpretation of Protestantism. The former attaches great importance to the interpretation of priests and popes, while the latter is dissatisfied with the monopoly of priests and proposes that everyone can contact God through the Bible. As for the Anglican Church, at that time, the king of England wanted to divorce and get married (in order to have children, there was one later), but the Pope refused and started his own business. Others are basically the same as Catholicism.

West? Mom? Catholicism, in fact, there is not much difference between Catholicism and Orthodox Church. Although there are 67 bibles and 73 bibles on the Internet, the most important thing is that there are differences in teaching principles. The two sides have different understandings of some very important issues, that is, different values. The major differences here are not as secular as people think (so-called power distribution), and there are also many differences in understanding theology, which is very important in religion. To put it bluntly, you have a different understanding of the God you believe in. Then there are different ways to practice faith, but today, Catholicism and Orthodox Church are reconciled, and the Pope and Orthodox Patriarch recognize each other. Although the two sides are different in church staffing, personnel management system, church organization and so on, and ordinary believers participate in the church in different ways (because of different doctrines), after all, Catholicism and Orthodox Church are far more related than Catholicism and Protestantism. Christianity? But in fact, Christianity is a general term for Catholicism, Orthodox Christianity and Protestantism, which has many factions. Are Protestantism and Catholicism not just? Different moms? , but? A feud? Protestants mean swearing against Christianity (swearing against Rome), and they regard the Pope as their enemy. So in terms of religion, Protestantism is the mainstream religion, that is, religious conflicts in all English-speaking countries (Britain, the United States, Australia, Canada, etc.). )+North of the Rhine (Germany, Netherlands, Northern Europe, etc. ) and areas where Catholicism is the mainstream religion (France, Spain, Portugal, Italy, South America, etc. ) has always been fierce. Of course, religious conflicts have greatly cooled down in modern times. Besides, England is also two? Dad? Well, England was once a province of the Roman Empire, but Scotland came from the Celts in Brittany, western France.

Christianity is divided into Protestantism, Catholicism and Orthodox Christianity. The picture shows the general scope of each sect.

Their? Dad? Called Rome, Western Europe was the source of Roman soldiers at that time, and Eastern Europe was the source of Roman slaves and colonies. Western Europe? Mom? Catholic, Russia? Mom? It's called the Orthodox Church. Western Europeans think they are superior to Slavs, because they are not slaves, so they have a natural sense of discrimination against Slavs. Just like the housekeepers and dung pickers in ancient China. Another question is who is the successor of orthodox Rome. Both Germans and Russians consider themselves the orthodox heirs of the Roman Empire. In fact, the difference between Catholicism and Orthodox Church lies in who is the boss! Catholicism believes that Pope Peter in Rome is the boss, Orthodox believes that pastors in local churches are the bosses, and ecumenical patriarch in Constantinople is only the mediator. This is the difference.

The Orthodox Church in Christianity is the process of Christianity's eastward expansion, which conforms to the historical trend. So Archduke Urakimir accepted the Orthodox Church, which is what we call the Orthodox Church. Ross was baptized, and everyone was baptized by a priest from East Rome on the Dnieper River. At that time, the people were unwilling to accept it. The expansion of general religions is mostly in Europe, and most of them are from the bottom up. But he pushed it from top to bottom, and you had to accept it. Many people are dissatisfied, and the family secretly provides the primitive worship of these gods. Grand Duke Urakimir sent his guards to find out who took it. The house burned down for you, you were ordered, and you had to accept the orthodox religion. He thought he needed a spiritual leader to unify the country, so he chose the Orthodox Church.

Roman Catholic Pope and Russian Orthodox Patriarch

Three: the contradiction between race and descent

From the time of Russia, Western Europe regarded Russia as a barbarian. Of course, Russian civilization is western, and its foundation is Byzantine. In the later period, the Netherlands, Britain and France had the greatest influence. After driving out the invaders, Russia actually played a more important role in safeguarding the Eastern Slavic brothers. The Holy Roman Empire also said that Russia was a hero who saved western civilization from Turkey, and Napoleon later said that Russia was the savior of Europe!

At that time, Britain had not been able to influence the European continent, and France's expansion policy attracted opposition from Spain and Shenluo. So before the Spanish war of succession to the throne, it was basically a war between France and Shenluo+Spain, that is, a war between France and the emperor. The war of succession to the Spanish throne was the first time that British forces penetrated into the European continent, which affected the balance of power in the European continent, and it was also the period when Prussia's military power rose. The most typical battle provoked by Britain was the Prussian Seven-Year War. In the end, Prussia completely defeated Britain on the mainland and won overseas. It immediately abandoned Prussia and left it to its own devices. As a result, Paul I was miraculously born. Of course, it cannot be said that Paul's policy is wrong. Therefore, it is actually wrong for Britain to provoke a dispute between France and Germany. Britain provoked the struggle between France and Prussia, and it was from the 7-year War to the Franco-Prussian War. After the Franco-Prussian War, Germany suppressed France in an all-round way, and Britain could only support France.

Family relations of the last czar

The origin of the Hundred Years' War between Britain and France, Charlemagne's grandson (the king of England) challenged Charlemagne's grandson (the king of France). The origin of the war was only that the national strength of Britain and France had changed, and the king of England thought he was qualified to be Charlemagne's successor. To put it bluntly, the people of the vassal regime suffered. Even after the Hundred Years' War between Britain and France, the royal family still married. After the bourgeois-democratic revolution broke out in Britain, the king of England still fled to France.

In fact, most people have been immersed in the concept of race. In the actual history of the West, people are divided according to their lineages, nobles only intermarry with nobles, and the transfer of power only happens among nobles. The historical background of British constitutional monarchy is that the restored feudal king persecuted the bourgeois aristocrats, and the bourgeois aristocrats found the Dutch prince and his wife with royal blood as the king of England, and the Dutch prince and his wife who were helped to the throne of England had to hand over their power. Even now, members of the royal family in almost any country in Europe have priority over British civilians in the order of succession to the throne because of blood, not race. I think it was Napoleon who really subverted European traditions. Bourgeois revolutionaries started, and almost all the common people in Europe supported Napoleon, because everyone saw the hope of breaking the hereditary rights of feudal nobles, and those who won the hearts of the people won the world. This is the reason why Napoleon was in full swing in Europe. On the contrary, all the royal families in Europe United against Napoleon and helped France to restore the feudal system, because there was a * * * France in Europe, which was tantamount to vindicating the oppressed bourgeoisie in other countries.

Russia has always regarded itself as the leader of the western civilized world. The natural heir of the Roman Empire and the patron saint of the Orthodox Church. I don't care about being equal with countries like Europe, Britain, France and Germany. At present, there is a serious corruption problem at the top of western politics. This corrupt group is naturally hostile to traditional Christian forces. Look inside the EU, don't Eastern Europe also have differences and struggles with Western Europe? It is not the material conditions that measure the strength of a country, but the spirit and the will of the people. Russia is now raising the banner of Christian revival and trying to suppress the evil forces inside the West, which of course makes them hate it. In addition, it is not Russia that has changed, but the western civilization has deteriorated under the habitual corrosion of the Jewish capital system. The present layout is determined by the rise and fall of western civilization in the future. I'm afraid no one here will agree to kneel down to develop the economy for a few mouthfuls of poisonous rice. Against the cabal, money is beyond your control, and doing big things is not a small account.

Russians are biased towards the west in appearance, but this has not affected the relationship between Russia and the west.

Russians are westerners at heart, and the way of seeing the world is the same as that of westerners, which is very different from that of China. China is the unity of heaven and man, and the external environment is a part of people, or the external environment has a great influence on people. Russians or westerners, people and the outside world are antagonistic, and the incompatibility between mind and environment is that the mind transforms the environment, and there is no concept of harmony and unity between spirit and environment. So in the eyes of Russia or westerners, those houses, roads and infrastructure are just a result of the transformation of the world by ideas. If there is, it is a work of art that suits your heart. If not, it doesn't matter if it is tattered. Because the west basically believes in the mind and does not attach importance to external things. Even if there is something external, it is a compound mental thing. In other words, the west is the base camp of idealism, while the east is actually real materialism.