Zeng's follow-up investigation

They were arrested on May 8, 20 1 1 year, and two girls were rescued on May 8, 201year,1year, and no one sent food or water for nearly 7 days. Fortunately, he led to the death of two imprisoned women, so he was also suspected of attempted murder.

-Judge

"I don't want to escape the punishment of capital punishment. I also have children and women. I just hope to give me a fair judgment based on real evidence. "

-Zeng

Audition dialogue

In the court investigation stage, the public prosecution agency interrogated Zeng according to various criminal facts.

"Did you hit Phillips and Xiaoxi in the cellar?" The prosecutor asked Zeng.

"No."

"Have you ever thought that one day will be found? Have you ever thought about letting them out? "

"I thought I would be discovered, but I never thought about letting them go."

"I have never raped Phillips and Xiaoxi more than one hundred times. I don't know how this number came from. " Crying once interrupted the question.

After that, whenever the public prosecutor asked if there were other criminal facts, they answered "no" directly.

Because he did not cooperate with the prosecutor's interrogation, the trial entered the stage of proof.

In the process of giving evidence at 1 hour, the prosecution listed the testimony of a large number of victims, physical evidence and Zeng's own confession.

"Once I was locked in the cellar, and there was a woman lying on the bed with fetters on her feet. After that, she untied her ankle and tied us together with a thin chain. " Xiao Fei said in his testimony.

Focus of trial

During the court debate, the public prosecutor said that the target of the crime had been randomly selected to commit violence in a relatively small area around his residence, and the victims were all young and middle-aged women. Its criminal means are despicable and cruel, and the circumstances are bad, which is extremely harmful to society. In this trial, his guilty attitude is poor, and he should be punished with four crimes: rape, robbery, robbery and illegal detention. It is recommended that he be sentenced to death according to law and executed immediately.

Zeng's defender believes that in this case, the crime was committed because of the pursuit of sexual stimulation, but it did not cause serious consequences for the victim's death or serious injury. Moreover, when he committed crimes many times, he voluntarily gave up adultery when he was resisted. Its influence on society is not extremely bad.

In addition, taking the initiative to confess a number of criminal facts in the public security organs should belong to the plot of surrender and can be given a lighter punishment. At the same time, the defense also believes that he has been to the hospital for treatment, and his mental fear is abnormal, which should be limited liability, so he requests the court to make a mental appraisal.

"Can the undead say that there are no serious consequences?" The prosecutor retorted that the consequences of the case were composed of many factors. According to the law of our country, the severity of rape cases can not be judged only by whether it causes death or injury. He once detained two weak women for more than a year and committed violence, resulting in particularly serious criminal consequences. Regarding whether it is necessary to conduct a psychiatric appraisal, the prosecution believes that they were conscious and normal when they were examined, and there were no signs of mental abnormality.

Bring someone to justice

preliminary examination/check

On the evening of July 2, 2009, around 10, a woman named Hong (pseudonym) who was only 18 years old was also locked in the cellar by Zeng Bao Qiang. The two girls were imprisoned in the cellar for 590 days and 3 17 days respectively. On may 8, 20 10, he was arrested by the police. The police rescued two imprisoned girls from the cellar of Zeng's home in Xujiagang Village, Beihu Farm, Qingshan District.

The case of Zeng rape was heard in public on 20111116, and Zeng himself and his defense lawyers applied for psychiatric appraisal. I once confessed to the police: I think rape has a special physical satisfaction. Every time I follow and follow a single woman, I feel excited, and sometimes I feel irritable and impulsive. "I suspect that this pathological behavior is a mental illness and I have been to a mental hospital in the name of others." The defense lawyer also suggested that he had a serious mental disorder and should be a person with limited capacity.

second trial

2011July 18, the reporter learned from the Hubei Higher People's Court that the court had recently made a second-instance ruling on the case of illegal detention and rape, rejected its appeal and upheld the death sentence of the first instance. The court of first instance held that his behavior constituted rape, illegal detention, robbery and robbery respectively, and he was sentenced to death for several crimes. Once refused to accept, immediately appealed.

After the trial of the second instance by the Provincial High Court, the appellant once put forward the reasons for appealing against the appraisal conclusion of the public security organ. After investigation, the appraisal conclusion of the public security organ is legal and effective from the sample extraction to the appraisal procedure. Therefore, the grounds for appeal cannot be established.

The appellant once put forward the appeal reason of "I dug the cellar to sell gray bricks". After investigation, the purpose of digging the first cellar did not rule out that it was to sell gray bricks, but it did not affect the fact that it was later used to rape and detain the victims, Hong Hong and Li Li, nor could it be used as a reason for lighter punishment. Therefore, this ground of appeal is inadmissible.

As for the appellant's appeal reason that "I have serious mental disorder and am a person with limited capacity". After investigation, no relevant evidence of his mental history or family history of mental illness was provided in the first and second trials. He has a clear motive and purpose of committing crimes, carefully planned before committing crimes, and has a strong sense of self-protection during and after committing crimes. During the trial, I answered the question to the point. Therefore, the court rejected this appeal.

The Higher People's Court of Hubei Province held that several crimes should be punished together. In order to vent their sexual desire for a long time, they illegally detained the victim and Li Li in a dark, damp and filthy cellar, and raped them for a long time and many times, which seriously destroyed the physical and mental health of the two victims and caused extremely bad social impact. At the same time, he committed 9 crimes of rape, which was extremely subjective and vicious, and the circumstances were extremely serious, which was extremely harmful to society and should be sentenced to death. The original judgment was accurate in conviction and appropriate in sentencing. The trial procedure is legal.

Therefore, the appeal was dismissed and the original judgment was upheld. the Supreme People's Court approved the death penalty according to law.