Compare the political systems of China and Greece and Rome with 500 words.

A comparison between the autocratic monarchy in ancient China and the democratic politics in ancient Greece;

(1) Since the Qin Dynasty, China has formed a centralized monarchy, and ancient Greece has already formed a democracy represented by Athens. In the ancient Greek city-state, the consul was elected and his power was restricted by the Senate and other institutions; During the Shang and Zhou Dynasties in China, ministers were appointed by the monarch, nobles were enfeoffed by the emperor, and the power of reward and punishment was concentrated in the hands of the monarch.

(2) The historical roles of the two regimes are similar. After entering the civilized era, both China and Greece have made brilliant achievements. Their political system was followed and imitated by later generations. The agriculture in ancient China and the industry and commerce in ancient Greece were very developed, and the culture and art were also very prosperous, which was closely related to the system construction.

(3) The two regimes also have their own advantages and disadvantages. The centralized monarchy has played a positive role in maintaining the unity of the nation and the country and maintaining the stability and continuity of the development of civilization. With the progress of civilization and the enhancement of human consciousness of independence and equality, this authoritarian regime has become an obstacle to human freedom and social progress. Ancient Greek democracy, represented by Athenian democracy, gave citizens the space to develop their talents freely and their thoughts were unprecedentedly active. But it empowers all citizens, and it does not require state managers to have professional knowledge or insight. The decentralization of power is also one of the reasons for the decline of ancient Greek civilization.