How to evaluate Trump’s election Zhihu

No flaws have been found in Trump’s election so far, and Hillary has also admitted defeat. It shows that Trump’s appointment as President of the United States is legal. Why is the discussion going on for so long? There are few people who are not frustrated by the predictions of "choice and will".

This explains the superposition, eloquently.

Is anyone telling the truth? Maybe, I didn't read it. Everything I read was blaming China.

Ding Xueliang, a professor at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, wrote for the FT Chinese website and compared the Trump incident to the Cultural Revolution in 1966.

If you have a degree, your writing will produce flowers. You can always express your opinions by talking nonsense, which naturally represents a high opinion.

I can also compare Trump to Deng’s reform and opening up. What is the difference between Trump’s policy of 100-day reform and Deng Xiaoping’s speech during his southern tour?

The most reliable one is Mr. Ma’s “Ten Principles of the Nation.”

All populist manifestos are similar to Trump. It is not surprising that we are reminded of former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan’s remarks about South America in his memoirs. He said that due to the influence of populism, South America has not been able to unite with the Federal Reserve, which is why it has a "Latin American crisis."

Paul Krugman, winner of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Economics, commented on the South American economy and said that fixed exchange rates are a "Latin American trap."

Their political and economic analysis has entered the framework of monetary theory tools. The so-called populism is imperialism based on national currency.

Trump’s election platform is based on dollar-based populism. Stirring the great-power chauvinism of most Americans.

The chauvinism of any great power will prevail in its own politics. Because it's extremely inflammatory. Especially for mass movements, it has an almost religious appeal.

This was true in 1966. This was true in 1980. This was even more true in 1990. Great power chauvinism destroyed the Berlin Wall and the Kremlin’s world power. China rebuilt Deng Xiaoping's authority.

What prestige? Dollar-based faith.

In 2006, China accumulated US$3 trillion in savings and began to challenge the United States and appreciate the RMB. Greenspan was negligent in calculation and misunderstood characteristic socialism, thinking that it would really share dividends with the people. The result was the 2008 financial tsunami.

How to explain the new normal of the world pattern?

Obama believes that welfare must be increased to rescue the United States. It has not been able to stop the long-term influx of the RMB. In 2015, the RMB was included in the SDR, and the US TPP was frustrated. A number of theater-style battle bases suddenly emerged in the South China Sea. For the first time, China and Russia conducted drills in Red Square and the South China Sea, using nuclear weapons to deter the security of the United States and its allies. This is the swearing-in ceremony for the new Cold War after the 1990 incident.

For the first time since inviting China to join the WTO in 1971, the United States has sensed the threat of US$4 trillion being controlled by China. People question whether Obama's acceptance of the Peace Prize is useful to U.S. security. The United Kingdom took the lead in opposing the European Union's romanticism and staged a referendum to leave the European Union, warning the Western world against indulgence in militarism.

After being defeated by the Democratic Party’s welfare bribery, the Republican Party chose Trump, a businessman who has always been outspoken, to challenge former first lady Hillary.

An ordinary construction contractor competes with royal relatives for position. Betting spreads in gambling games have never been better. The banker's premeditation is revealed beyond measure. Just like betting on horses is crazy. The ending is normal. What is unexpected but reasonable is that "the lame horse wins".

It doesn’t matter if you guessed Marseille wrong, but there are many people talking about the misjudgment. Among them, Ding Xueliang’s historical materialist analysis is the least reliable. Comparing it with a similar event in history often leads differences to the wrong route. For example, China’s Cultural Revolution in 1966 cannot explain Trump’s election. The similarity is democratic elections, but the difference is the financial system, the exchange rate between China and the United States, is controlled by the Federal Reserve. Therefore, the Sino-US model can only be explained using monetary theory tools.

Historical materialism is outdated.

As for what is historical materialism? Marx defined it as class struggle. That was the Cultural Revolution in 1966. What is monetary theory? That’s Trump’s taxing tool.

Trump’s use of taxation to regulate various relationships is a new method of modern digital management in the United States. It coincides with Deng Xiaoping Theory. China and the United States work together to manage the world and no longer view historical materialism.

How to evaluate Trump’s election? Deng Xiaoping Theory shines brightly. A black cat or a white cat is a good cat if it can catch mice.