Job Recruitment Website - Immigration policy - Compared with Dawn, what is better about Nicholas Tse's acting?

Compared with Dawn, what is better about Nicholas Tse's acting?

Dawn is a good actor. Both Liming and Nicholas Tse have made very classic works, and of course they have also made many bad films. As people who eat melons, ranking is a hobby and instinct. I think Dawn's acting is good.

The first is the pinnacle. Sweetness of Dawn is better than Witness of Nicholas Tse, isn't it? "Sweet Honey" is a milestone of China's movies and the best love movie. It can reflect the cultural and survival difficulties of the mainland and Hong Kong in the old days, and has a rare spiritual imprint of "mother root". As far as Hong Kong movies are concerned, I feel that this movie is the only one.

After reading the honey, you will feel that the "Hong Kong spirit" that Hong Kong people are proud of in the most glorious era was actually created by our mainlanders immigrating to Hong Kong. In contrast, Witness is only a phenomenal work in the era of film decline, and its quality is acceptable in the era of bad movies. An actor without a masterpiece, even if his acting skills are awesome, is purely wasteful and meaningless. There are masterpieces, but also look at the high aura of masterpieces, so that actors can shine at the moment.

Unique understanding Secondly, in fact, the basis of discussing this issue is actually to discuss our understanding of the concept of acting. Performance is an actor's understanding and communication of roles. Communication in place is the basic skill, and unique understanding is the realm of performance.

Because actors have certain strength, it is not difficult to convey the status of the role with body movements, expressions, eyes, etc. It is the ability to understand the role that determines the actor's acting level. I don't know if you still remember that Chen was a guest in a variety show and said something similar when he was in class with students from Beijing Film Academy. Performance is actually an understanding of the role.

For example, in The Birth of an Actor, Jiao Xu played the scene where Luo Xiaohu robbed Yu Jiaolong in Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon. Zhang Ziyi criticized her for staying in the imitation stage, not fully understanding the role and indigestion of lines. Chen Kaige instructed Jiao Xu Yujiaolong to be a disciple of the Blue-eyed Fox, and he was arrogant and arrogant. Otherwise, he was afraid that the reaction of seeing the robbers would make the plot break smoothly. After Jiao Xu was adapted, he had a new understanding of this role, and his later performances were very successful.

On the other hand, Nicholas Tse's understanding of the role shows that it is reasonable to integrate the emotional anger of "facial paralysis" into the performance of Witness. The role is a strong support for his performance, and it is also very convincing in bodyguards and assassins, but many other films feel stiff and have no strong support.

Dawn can also be regarded as the expression of "facial paralysis", but he is in an emotional state. Looking at it with his eyes, he feels that people and characters are integrated. Characters like Sweet Honey and Night House can blend into their own temperament without feeling unnatural. Yes, only these two plays impressed me deeply, and I forgot all the others. After all, I haven't seen Hong Kong films for many years.