Which brand is more acceptable for beginners to smoke cigars?

Novices should choose what kind of cigars from two aspects, one is the price, the other is the taste.

Based on the brand and size you mentioned, I didn't recommend you to go to Mont, pigs or something from the beginning. Those who smoke those cigars must accumulate a certain degree of cigar knowledge in order to appreciate their rich layering. Many tomato friends agree that it is a misunderstanding for newcomers to draw a "small crown" with a diameter of 42 rings at first, because the common "small crown" needs to be raised for a long time, and it usually takes half a year to start to taste. Many old friends think that if they can afford it, they can start with Davidoff 2000 or 3000. It tastes mild and is called "the king of ancient times". The light and smooth smoking experience at the beginning will be very helpful for you to taste rich cigars such as partagas and Bolí var in the future. If you think cigars like David Duff are too expensive, you can also start with some basic Cuban handmade or semi-handmade cigars. I always think that the best introductory cigars should be those that can give full play to their flavor without long-term aging, such as Punch-Punch, friends Roberto Monterey Jr, Upp Manate 46 and Agate 50 series, which are very layered and full of surprises. In addition, the mechanism cigars from Bidaya, quintero and Bola Niagara can be used as entry cigars, with different sizes, but most of them have little change in taste and relatively low prices. The disadvantage is that it needs to be preserved for a long time, but as an introductory cigar, it doesn't waste money to smoke. Monte 1, No.3 and No.4 have similar tastes, and cigars like Pig Dwarf Mountain are also full and mild, but I don't think it is suitable for getting started. You can buy it and smoke it for a while.