Job Recruitment Website - Immigration policy - Does the repatriation of foreign criminals in Australia conflict with the policy?

Does the repatriation of foreign criminals in Australia conflict with the policy?

In fact, Australia's repatriation of foreign criminals is not in conflict with its own policy, because it is to protect its own safety.

Just about four days ago, Australia escorted 12 foreign criminals back to China in the form of charter flights, namely Italy and Britain. This test was originally intended to make their own country safer. This measure is definitely against the restrictions of countries in preventing and controlling the COVID-19 epidemic, but it is imperative for the Australian government, because it is to ensure the security of basic countries.

The Australian side indicated that it will continue to implement the policy of repatriating foreign criminals, mainly to cooperate with its government's efforts to cancel visas for pedophiles and sex offenders, mainly to make itself safer. Because we know that there has been a cluster infection in American prisons, when there are less than 1000 prisoners in a prison, more than 1000 people will be infected with COVID-19, which means that the prison is originally a high-risk area, so repatriating these foreign prisoners will make the prison environment in our country quieter. Secondly, if foreign prisoners are not in their own countries, their social security can be more secure, because these people are likely to bring harm to Australian citizens.

They took this action mainly to save thousands of children in Australia and prevent them from being violated. Although the cost of repatriation is high for the Australian government, it is imperative for the government. At present, there are about 250 aggressors who have committed serious crimes and are currently being held in Australian prisons. In order to overcome the travel obstacles caused by the COVID-19 epidemic, it is imperative to repatriate these people. In order to prevent COVID-19 from spreading internationally, the international community prohibits international travel, which is equivalent to Australia's violation of international policies to send these people back to other countries. But what I want to say is that according to Australia's own policies, this is understandable.

Moreover, according to the Australian immigration law, foreigners who have lived in Australia for less than 10 years can be sent back to China if they commit a serious criminal offence in Australia, so they can be imprisoned for more than one year.