Why do I say that the Syrian dispute is an extension of the Sino-US trade war?

There are two fundamentals to the Syrian issue. One is: Syria has a Russian surname and belongs to Russia’s traditional political jurisdiction. It is also the political extension of Russia in the Middle East. There is no essential difference between attacking Syria and attacking Russia, but the consequences are It is much smaller than touching the Russian mainland. The second is: the particularity of Syria’s geographical location. The Red Sea Strait passes through Suez and reaches the Mediterranean Sea, and beyond that is Syria. The maritime part of the Belt and Road Initiative goes through the Red Sea to the Suez Canal and into the Mediterranean Sea and into Europe. Turkey has become very close to Europe in recent years, and its relations with China are also warming up. To slap Syria would be to show Turkey. As for sea areas, the Truman aircraft carrier fleet is currently located in the waters surrounding Syria and can be expanded if necessary. Drag the range and block the Suez outlet. And if the Suez Canal is blocked, the Belt and Road Initiative will either go around the Cape of Good Hope in Africa, or it will have to go north to the Arctic Ocean. Therefore, after China proposed the Belt and Road Initiative in the past two years, the United States has always made a fuss about the Syrian issue. That is because there is a lot to do here!

So the fight against Syria, politically speaking, is nothing more than flexing muscles and telling the relevant countries how to take sides. Our country's military ocean-going and even conventional overseas stationing capabilities are still in their infancy. It is not without reason that they are bullied everywhere. It is not a waste of money to vigorously develop its naval power. Without control over these locations, our Belt and Road Initiative is just talk on paper.

In this world, fists speak!