Which countries were split by India?

India has more than 3 nationalities and is a typical multi-ethnic country. India is a relatively democratic country. India covers an area of 3 million square kilometers and its population has now reached 1.1 billion. It is a country with a large population and a large area. A big country that belongs to the standard.

India is a former colony of Britain. Although it is a colony, the British did not immigrate to India. On the contrary, India has a large number of immigrants in Britain. Judging from the actual situation, Britain can basically be said to be a colony of India. Of course, from this new colonial perspective, Indian colonies are all over the world.

India was divided once. After Britain withdrew from the Indian subcontinent, India split into two, and one inherited the name of India, which is now India. One was founded under a new name, which is now Pakistan. There is an Indus River in Pakistan. Old India was divided into two countries according to religious beliefs. Old Indians mainly believe in two religions, Hinduism and Islam. Where the Hindu population has a large proportion, it will be distributed to India. Distribute it to Pakistan where the population of Islam is large. This divided old India into two countries. New India is in the middle and constitutes a whole. Pakistan is on both sides and is not connected with each other. After more than 2 years, Pakistan split again, with the help of new India. The part to the west of Pakistan inherits the name of Pakistan. The eastern part of Pakistan has a new country name, which is now Bangladesh. It can be seen that old India has been divided twice in just a few decades. Without partition of india. This old India should be the world's most populous country with an area of 4 million square kilometers and a population of 1.5 billion.

The ethnic composition of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka is very interesting. You have me, and I have you. Often a nation belongs to two or more countries.

first, the interference of caste system. I guess this is the most important point. Most people in New India believe in Hinduism. Hinduism allows caste system. The caste system interferes with the internal cohesion of various ethnic groups in India, and the caste system greatly weakens the internal cohesion of ethnic groups. Such strong interference is extremely unfavorable to unity within the nation and resistance to foreign forces during foreign aggression. This is an important reason why India has been occupied by foreign forces many times. But in new India, the caste system is still beneficial. The great weakening of national cohesion has also weakened the desire and ability of all ethnic groups to be independent or split from each other. This is the most important reason why India has not continued to split.

(Can the same ethnic group in India belong to different castes? I guess it should be like this. I didn't see such an explanation clearly. It can be said that the concept of nationality in India is very different from that in other countries. I suggest that you stop taking India, a so-called multi-ethnic country where the main ethnic group does not have an absolute advantage, as an example, you can not split.

it is estimated that there are relatively minor reasons. For example, ethnic groups in India live together. This has also weakened the power that various ethnic groups may split.

It is estimated that there is another relatively important factor, religious factor. The same ethnic group in India believes in different religions, which also greatly weakens the motivation of unity among ethnic groups. Weakened the ability of all ethnic groups to split.

Hindus and Islamists live together. This has also weakened the potential separatist ability and motivation in various parts of India.

India is not without separatist forces. In the northeast corner of India, there are yellow people living there. The population is very different from that of other parts of India. Some people here may be fighting for independence.

Some people say that democratic countries will not split. This should not make much sense. Democracies can also split. There are facts and potential examples. Britain, for example, has experienced many divisions. The separation of Britain and Ireland should be regarded as the division of democratic countries! I don't know whether the separation of Britain from Canada, Australia and New Zealand is a division of democratic countries. Potential examples, such as the French population in Quebec, Canada, want to be independent. Of course, there are some independence movements in other democratic countries. I give these examples mainly to show that democratic countries are not inseparable. Democratic countries and non-democratic countries are the same in the question of whether they can split, and both have the possibility of splitting, and the probability of splitting is basically the same. The probability that a country will split is determined by other factors. This shows that the new India did not continue to split, not because of India's democratic system, but because of India's own special factors.