How do printed banknotes stay in society?

Bankers who eat roast chicken for free say that the money issued by the Federal Reserve is to be repaid, and the Federal Reserve itself will not consume printed banknotes in front of its own funds. Then, I want to ask: Why are there still a lot of money printing in society? By the end of 3004, according to the historical records published by the Federal Reserve, the Federal Reserve printed 65,438+000 banknotes. According to the statement of the Federal Reserve, this 65,438+000 SB does not belong to American nationals, nor is it distributed to American nationals free of charge, but is controlled by the Federal Reserve. However, the Federal Reserve did not use it directly, and part of it was lent to the federal government and replaced by federal government bonds; Part of it was lent to commercial banks and replaced by IOUs. Bonds and IOUs can be realized to realize the withdrawal of paper money. Therefore, this $65,438+000 SB bill is either the treasury currency deposited in the Federal Reserve Treasury or the creditor's rights on the books of the Federal Reserve. However, the amount of paper money in the Federal Reserve Treasury and the amount of creditor's rights (accounts receivable) on the books add up to only 40 sb. Among them, the cash stock is 65,438+00 yuan, and commercial banks owe 20 yuan and government bonds are 65,438+00 yuan. That is to say, of this 100sb banknote, only 40 sb belongs to the Federal Reserve, and the remaining 60 sb belongs to banks, enterprises and individuals. So, how did these 60 sb banknotes stay in society? In other words, why doesn't the Fed have the right to take back this 60 sb bill? Why did you lose your creditor's rights? In addition, according to the statistics of the United Nations Monetary Council, the global dollar bill stock in that year was 109.9 sb, which was inconsistent with the historical record of printing money published by the Federal Reserve, and increased by nearly 10 sb. What happened? If readers don't understand the above question, let's put it another way: if the United States was just founded in early 1999 and its citizens just immigrated to the United States from all over the world, American families had only goods and no money at that time, and Americans lived a primitive life of bartering for goods for a year. At the end of 1999, the Federal Reserve printed an additional 65,438+000 SB paper money on the basis of zero paper money stock, of which 50 sb bought US federal government bonds and the other 50 sb lent it to American commercial banks. The annual interest rate of government bonds and commercial bank loans is 65,438+0%. Five years later, at the end of 3004, the Federal Reserve said that it had withdrawn all the $65,438+000 SB and charged interest on the $5 sb. That is to say, according to the self-introduction of the Federal Reserve, at the end of 2004, there were 65,438+000 Sbs in the big money Ku banknotes of the Federal Reserve and 5 Sbs in the small money banks of the Federal Reserve, making a total of 65,438+005 Sbs. That is to say, at the end of 2004, the dollar stock in society was negative, with five sb's. But in fact, after auditing, only 10 sb was found in the Federal Reserve Treasury, 20 sb was owed by commercial banks, and 10 sb was not cashed in the federal government bonds. The three figures add up to only 40 sb, and the remaining 60 sb remains in the society, becoming the social currency that the Fed can't enjoy the creditor's rights at all. According to the audit results of the United Nations Monetary Council on global currencies, there are not only 60 sb US dollar bills that the Fed does not enjoy creditor's rights, but also nearly 70 sb US dollar bills. Then ask: how did those idiots in the 1960 s and 1970 s stay in society? Is it that the Federal Reserve distributes the 60 sb or 70 sb as social property to American citizens equally, and then American citizens spend it around the world, so that they can flow in and stay around the world? The answer is no, as early as 900 years ago, 20 1 1 year, Liu suggested that the printed banknotes should be divided equally. However, it was unanimously opposed by bankers all over the world who ate roast chicken for nothing. They laughed wildly at Liu's ignorance of economy, let alone money and banking. Therefore, Liu and others have never accepted the proposal. Therefore, instead of distributing the banknotes printed by factories to American citizens equally, the Federal Reserve has been stealing printed banknotes for its own use, then lending them to the government and commercial banks, and then charging interest. So, how did the sixty or seventy sb dollars flow into and stay in society? My guess is that the answer is: first, the Fed has spent. The Federal Reserve will pay part of the sb interest charged to employees as wages and bonuses, and employees will consume these banknotes. The money spent through this consumption channel has become social currency and cannot be recovered. Second, the Fed has been rewarded. The Federal Reserve distributes some of the five sb rights as dividends to shareholders, who consume these banknotes in society and become social currency. Third, bribery and bad debts. Business owners pay bribes to commercial banks and then default. Commercial banks paid bribes to the Federal Reserve, and the Federal Reserve relaxed its supervision, which eventually led to serious bad debts or even bankruptcy of one or even some commercial banks, and the loans lent by the Federal Reserve could not be recovered, leaving a lot of dollars in society. Then, employees of the Federal Reserve and commercial banks who accept bribes, as well as business owners who are in arrears with debts, spend all the dollars in hand through eating, drinking, gambling and extravagance, so that a large number of dollars flow to and stay in the hands of fart people, and the Federal Reserve cannot enjoy its creditor's rights, let alone recover them. Fourth, build large-scale projects to transform monetary assets into physical assets. It costs a lot of dollars to build luxury office buildings, luxury houses and luxury entertainment facilities with money paper money, and accepts bribes from builders. In bookkeeping, these spent dollars are counted as physical assets. By 2005, the value and scale of office buildings exceeded the sum of the Capitol, the Fuehrer's Capital Building and the Supreme Court Building. The Federal Reserve also provides a luxury plane and a dedicated airport for each employee. The price of each plane is more than 10 times that of the US head of state plane, and the special airport is not open to anyone except the Federal Reserve. Of course, the money spent in this way will stay in the society and no longer enjoy the creditor's rights, let alone withdraw it. Fifth, the number of waste coins is fictitious, with more printing and less filling. In the general ledger of the Federal Reserve, one or two sb dollars are discarded every year, and then the same amount of dollars are printed to supplement them. In fact, however, only one or two SG dollars need to be scrapped every year. In other words, two SGs were actually scrapped, but 200 SGs were scrapped in the book report; There are only two SGs to be printed in USD, but the actual USD to be printed is 200 SGs. In this way, 198 SG( 19.8 sm, 1.98 sb) was added to the ledger, and nearly 10 sb was added in five years. They quietly spent nearly $65,438+00 SB, which is quite different from the money they lent, so naturally they can't and don't need to return it. If they don't waste money, print more and make up less, how can there be an extra sb of nearly 10 in the stock of paper money in society? Sixth, bribery. Pay bribes to government officials, members of Congress, court judges, monetarists and bankers, and sing praises to the actions of the Federal Reserve. Otherwise, why did the U.S. Congress give the Federal Reserve the right to coin money endowed by the Constitution and refuse to take it back for a long time? Why didn't the judge of the United States federal court declare federal reserve act unconstitutional? Why don't they accept Liu's suggestion of increasing the share of funds? Why do they laugh at Liu's ignorance of money and banking? Like Ron, who served as a member of the US House of Representatives for a long time more than 900 years ago (around 2000 AD)? Mr Paul said, "The Fed can let them spend money freely". We don't know how the money spent on bribery is accounted for, but the money spent in this way will definitely not be recovered, even if it is only on the books. Among the above six ways, the first way and the second way are to eat the roast chicken that looks legal but is actually directly plundered, and then pull the shit into the society and turn it into a social currency that cannot be returned. The last four ways are corruption, that is, directly embezzling roast duck and privately dividing roast duck, which is illegal on the surface but illegal in essence. The latter four ways of corruption can make dollars flow quickly and stay in society. I don't know if the Fed has any other ways to keep the dollar in society. If I were the chairman of the Federal Reserve, I would not sit still and wait for death. I would do everything possible to embezzle the dollars of big banks, turn them into dollars of small banks, and then turn them into dollars in my pocket, and then flow to the society, stay in the society, lose my creditor's rights and be unable to withdraw them. Dear American fart people, although you are rich, if the Fed is not corrupt, you can't have cash in your hand. It is because of the corruption of the Federal Reserve that you have your own cash, so you should thank the corruption of the Federal Reserve. But will the Fed accept your thanks? No, they don't believe in the money spent by corruption. They often think: why do you people have paper money that we can't collect? So, they finally came up with a way, that is, constantly printing paper money and constantly eroding it, so that there are more and more US dollar bills in the society and the paper money in your hand will depreciate rapidly. So, in 3008, they printed 100 sb banknotes and put them into the society quickly, which made the banknotes in your hand depreciate rapidly by 50%. Although the Fed can't take out all the money, it devalues the money in your hand, so they are very happy. Pro-American people, if the U.S. Congress strictly enforces the U.S. Constitution, takes back the right to coin money into its own hands, and then accepts Liu's suggestion to distribute each batch of printed banknotes to every citizen equally, do you still have to rely on the corruption of the Federal Reserve to get cash? Will you still suffer from inflation? The answer is obvious, please wake up!