College entrance examination immigration affects promotion.

When the supply of educational resources exceeds demand like air, it will not be like this, and it is impossible to achieve educational equality under the condition that things are scarce and expensive.

The hidden unfairness in the exam —— Yuan from Yuyao Daily

The examination is based on fairness. The so-called examination fairness means that everyone who meets the conditions of reference objects has the opportunity to participate in study, training and examination. In the same examination, the examination content and answering time are the same, and they are equal before marking and marking. Judging from the form of examination within the time limit, examination is indeed a fair and just means to change people's social roles. However, from the first study or training, through the examination to admission, candidates will find that there are many unfairness hidden in the examination.

1, the candidate's talent. Genius is genius. There is a scientific basis. Scientists believe that human talent is a trait produced and inherited by genes related to talent in biological individuals. Two candidates, one talented and the other dull, want to get the same exam results under the same learning environment and conditions, and the latter doesn't know how many times the learning cost and sweat it will cost! One reads a book, and the other reads it dozens of times. This objective unfairness is directly reflected in the examination. The result is that "one becomes famous in one fell swoop, and the other falls to Sun Shan".

2. Environment and conditions. The environment and conditions of school and family will greatly affect the study and psychological quality of candidates. Mr. Lu Xun once said in a speech entitled "Before Genius": "So I think that before we ask for genius, we should ask for people who can make it grow. -for example, if you want to have good trees and flowers, you must have good soil; Without soil, there would be no flowers and trees; So soil is more important than flowers and trees. " Because of the differences between school and family environment, students in the same era performed very differently in the same exam. For example, the problem of fees has caused many poor students with excellent grades to drop out of school because they can't afford the fees.

3. The candidate's luck. The same multiple-choice question, you don't understand me, I am vague. As a result, you made the right choice, and I was all wet. Open the test paper, you see how familiar the test paper is, but I am so strange; Moreover, the high score proposition in the test paper is your strength, and I sigh, "Bad luck, bad luck." Such luck is common in exams. How can it be fair? It is inevitable that a lazy cat will meet a dead mouse.

4. Physical quality and psychological quality. Scientific research shows that everyone's brain has a wavy excitation period and inhibition period every day. Whoever can control the biological clock well will be able to enter the exam-oriented role in advance, which is conducive to the normal play of the level during the exam. Second, whoever can quickly adjust his psychology in the exam will quickly enter the normal state of the exam, and whoever can calmly answer the questions. Physical quality is the condition of strength struggle, and psychological quality is the foundation of strength. Maybe if I take the exam a few days later, I will be full of energy and play freely on the spot!

5. National and local policies. For example, the admission scores and admission rates of senior high school entrance examinations and college entrance examinations in different provinces are inconsistent, and the phenomenon of "college entrance examination immigrants" is rampant, resulting in the unfair phenomenon that the starting line is the same, but the end point varies from person to person. What's more, there are some promotion and selection exams, and the restrictions on the conditions for entering the exam have discouraged many people. I wonder how many rickshaws have been lost in Cai Wei? ! When will you get ahead if you don't meet Bole! There are also uneven and unfair distribution of teachers in various places, and high-quality teachers have gone to famous cities. The quality of education in urban and rural areas is polarized, with the poor worse and the good better. These are all related to the fairness of the exam!

6. Subjectivity of marking. Test scores are graded, but different raters will not understand the same answer exactly the same, so there will be some differences in the scores of subjective questions, especially composition and essay questions. If two raters are asked to grade the same test paper, the difference in their scores will be as few as a few points and as many as tens of points. Besides, grading is generally determined by people. If they don't care about reading mistakes, who can correct them? In the interview, this kind of subjective initiative is more obvious. "Radish and vegetables, each has his own love." A smiling face or an action can change your life.

7. Cheating in exams. Cheating in exams has always existed. Those who are exposed think they are "unlucky", and those who have not found it can enter the house as "mixed-eyed fish". Who knows the bottom? The only way is "there is no harm in not catching fraud, who knows that I am not a treasure"! Where is justice and fairness?

It is precisely because of this and so on that people question the fairness of the examination and expect the reform of the examination, especially the reform of the college entrance examination system. Dai Jiagan, director of the Examination Center of the Ministry of Education, once said in an interview: "Basic education should be built hard. They have been doing it since junior high school, not to say that they will not take the exam for life. I agree with this idea, but how to operate and how to ensure fairness and justice, I think this really needs a process, a step-by-step process. "

However, no matter how unfair the examination is, from the current situation, as one scholar said, "it is still a relatively modern, economical, effective, scientific, fair and internationally recognized means of selecting talents." Therefore, at present we must face it, understand it and accept it. "