5 Summary Reports on Debate Competition Activities

# Report # Introduction When writing a summary report, we should pay attention to clear objectives, highlight key points, and never cover everything; Be inspiring and appealing. The following is a summary report on the activities of the debate competition. Welcome to read it!

1. Summary Report of Debate Competition

At 6: 3 pm on October 15th, 2xx, the internal debate competition of Mufeng Law Society was successfully held in Room 317, Grammar Building. The purpose of this activity was to let the members feel the charm of the debate personally, and at the same time, to prepare for the debate competition between the three schools in the next semester.

The debate will be divided into two sessions: the first session is the academic department versus the International Liaison Department, and the debate topic is "Does society need generalists or professionals more"; The second is a heated debate between the Secretariat and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on whether the golden mean should be advocated. Although it is only an internal debate competition, all the members of the department actively participate in it, look for information by themselves and make full preparations. For those members who have not participated in the debate, the pre-competition preparation activities have made them understand the true meaning of "one minute on stage and ten years off stage". Because of their attention and careful preparation, the competition was so wonderful: the first debate started with a strong argument and a clear point of view. During the one-on-one debate, the debaters of both sides had flexible thinking and sharp words, and applause broke out from time to time. The wonderful confrontation in the free debate session pushed the debate to a high tide. After bickering between the two sides, the Academic Department and the Secretariat won the two competitions respectively, and the two debaters from the Propaganda and Policy Department and the External Relations Department also fully demonstrated their debating style, which was recognized by the judges and other members.

This debate has enabled members to fully appreciate the fun of the debate and at the same time understand the importance of teamwork. In the future journey, Mufeng Law Society will be more tacit and United!

2. Summary Report of Debate Competition Part II

In order to provide a platform for every urban construction student in the new era, enhance students' self-confidence and pride, promote the exchange of ideas and prosper campus culture. Jinkou Society of Henan Institute of Urban Construction has held a debate challenge in the East Campus.

In this debate challenge, all members of the debate department of Jinkoushe cooperated with each other, and the person in charge of the East Campus of Jinkoushe fully helped the debate department of Jinkoushe, so that the activity could achieve substantial results.

Therefore, Jinkou Society first submitted an invitation letter to the Department of Mathematics and Science. After a week of intense preparation, Jinkou Society and the Department of Mathematics and Science selected four players respectively. On the night of November 2, a fierce friendship debate was held in Room 112.

Before the competition, the departments of Jinkou Society fully supported the debate department of Jinkou Society, and the propaganda department made a lot of publicity, which fully demonstrated the coordination ability among the departments of Jinkou Society, strengthened the communication among the members of each department, and strengthened the relationship among the members of each department. And we have the honor to invite the members of the sub-army: civil engineering team, quarter army: law team in the freshman group of the debate competition of Henan Urban Construction College as the judges of this debate competition.

The whole classroom 112 was packed, and many students stood and watched the debate. This debate was attended by the Department of Mathematics and Physics and Jinkou Society. The debate lasted for about an hour, and went through six stages: opening argument, attack and defense, summary of attack and defense, free debate, summary statement and comments by judges. In this link of judges' comments, each judge comments on each player, which is to the point. Make every player convinced.

After the game, Jinkou social workers cleaned Room 112 and held an activity summary meeting. Summarize the advantages and disadvantages of the activity. This debate competition strengthened the relationship between Jinkou Society and various departments, and strengthened the debating ability between members of the society and various departments. The activity finally achieved satisfactory results. All members of Jinkou Society not only exercised themselves, but also strengthened their communication with freshmen.

3. Summary Report of Debate Competition Part III

On November 5th, 2xx, at 6: pm, the "Knowing and Doing Cup" debate on history was held in A84, Wenzong Building, South Campus, jointly organized by Everyone History Society of College of Law and Sciences of XX University and College Students Debate Society of XX University.

The guests attending this debate are: Mr. XX, Vice President of the School of Law of XX University, Mr. XX, Professor of History Department, and Mr. XX, the instructor of the community.

The judges present at this debate competition are: XX, President of the Students' Union of the College of Law and Sciences; XX, the debaters of the previous debates; XX, the research director of Everyone's History Society.

At the beginning of the debate, the 17th History XX students served as the executive chairman. At first, the two sides argued the opening theory, which added a touch of bright color to the competition.

The next step is to test the two sides' arguments and the summary of the two sides' arguments. In this link, the debaters of both sides are quick-thinking, and they are listening to each other's views carefully, hoping to seize the loopholes and win the commanding heights.

Then we came to the most tense and intense part of this debate-free debate, which tested the tacit understanding of both debaters and their understanding of the debate topic. When the free debate began, the atmosphere on the field became fierce. Both debaters were actively recording the questions raised by the other debaters and how to face them. Time passed, and in a blink of an eye, the free debate ended.

The four debates on both sides made the final closing work-summing up their speeches. The four debates on both sides were immersed in their own emotions and forcefully threw out their own opinions.

Finally, before the results were announced, the wonderful comments made by several history teachers such as XX pushed the debate contest to a high tide again. The speeches made by students from XX University Debate Society and XX Everyone History Society made the audience have a better understanding of the original intention of the two societies to hold the debate contest.

Finally, after careful evaluation by the judges, the winner was the opposing side and the debater was the affirmative side. This debate ended in a group photo and was a complete success.

4. Summary Report of Debate Competition

In order to exercise and improve students' eloquence and critical thinking ability, enrich students' after-school life, enliven campus culture, enhance students' consciousness of unity, cooperation, competition and enterprising, and reflect the spiritual outlook of contemporary college students, our class held a debate competition on "Freedom and Tolerance" on the evening of May 3th. The summary is as follows:

1. Pre-competition preparation:

In this debate, we will inform the contestants of the detailed and comprehensive activity plan and competition principles before the competition, so that the contestants can make full preparations for the debate before the competition and lay the foundation for the wonderful and smooth debate.

Second, debate topic:

The debate topic of this competition is very relevant to daily life, involving current affairs, campus issues, learning issues, communication issues, etc. The debaters can fully cite examples around them, which is very convincing. Make the whole debate venue colorful and lively. Debate procedure:

III. Competition procedure:

This competition is divided into one debate, two debates, three debates and four debates. First, the first debate and the second debate make an opening argument, clarifying our basic viewpoints, logical framework, theoretical basis, etc. in the most refined language, followed by tit-for-tat attacks and colorful free debates, followed by a summary statement by the fourth debate, and finally questions from the audience. The program setting of the debate competition is very reasonable, which makes the competition closely linked, provides a stage for the debaters to have a heated debate and face-to-face confrontation, and fully mobilizes the enthusiasm of the audience and enhances the interaction between the debaters and the audience.

Fourth, the level of debate:

Generally speaking, the level of the contestants is good. Both the debate language and their own image quality have a certain sense of beauty and grace, which reflects the youthful and positive face of contemporary college students.

Fifth, the atmosphere of the stadium:

The atmosphere of the stadium is extremely active from beginning to end, and there are high tides in every stage of the competition. The contestants boldly debate, and their language is fluent and highly personalized, and they can quote classics and witty remarks, which makes the audience feel a unique debate feast and give warm applause.

VI. Achievements of the Debate Competition:

This Debate Competition exercises and strengthens the class leaders' ability of organization and planning, which is conducive to their future class collective work, and also improves the debating ability and mutual cohesion of the contestants, so that they can realize the unique charm of the debate and realize the importance of unity and cooperation.

VII. Problems and shortcomings:

The organization of class cadres needs to be improved, for example, the debate competition is not standardized enough and the rules are not formulated strictly enough. Some contestants' logical thinking is not careful enough, their debates are not astute enough, their knowledge is not rich enough, and some of them make routine mistakes. Their logical thinking and knowledge level need to be improved.

VIII. Thinking after the game:

The game is over, and the result is important, but we should pay more attention to the game process, because during the game, we realized the importance of cultural knowledge, unity and cooperation, and making progress in the competition, which is very important for our future work and study. Therefore, we must study cultural knowledge hard at school, actively participate in school and class activities, and often carry out social practice, and strive to be a professional talent with high quality.

The purpose of summing up is to draw lessons and help the future work. In short, we will work in by going up one flight of stairs in the future, and strive to improve the cultural quality of students and make our own contribution to the prosperity of campus culture!

5. Summary Report of Debate Competition Part V

In order to enrich college students' after-school life, enliven campus culture, cultivate the unity, competition and enterprising qualities of contemporary college students, and reflect their mental outlook, the "Chasing the Wind Cup" debate competition for college students sponsored by the Learning Department of the Student Union of the College of Life Sciences came to a successful conclusion in November. The sponsorship of this activity is provided by Meishi Glasses to assist the Propaganda Department and the External Relations Department of the Student Union.

1. Activity mode:

This activity is for our college to form a team to participate in the competition in our college through internal selection of classes. In this debate, the elimination system was adopted. Seven teams participated in the competition, and one class was directly promoted to the semi-finals by drawing lots. In the first round, three teams won and entered the semi-finals. The classes entering the semi-finals were garden class, biological science class one, animal science class and biotechnology class four teams, and finally, after fierce competition, animal science class and biological science class one entered the finals.

Second, the time and place of the event:

The debating contest lasted for one month, and the preliminary contest was held in the lecture hall of the School of Life Sciences on November 2th, with three competitions. The semi-final will be held in the lecture hall of the School of Life Sciences

Time:

November 26th, with two matches. The final venue is in the lecture hall of the School of Life Sciences, and the time is November 3th.

III. Course of activities:

1. The preliminary contest was held in the lecture hall of the College of Life Sciences on November 2th. After drawing lots, the final contest was the first: biological engineering class-class 1, the second: class 2-animal science class, and the third: biotechnology class-gardening class. The final winners were: class 1, animal science class. Biotechnology class.

2. The rematch: held in the lecture hall of the College of Life Sciences on November 26th. After drawing lots, the final match was decided: Garden Class-Class 1 of Biological Sciences, Animal Science Class-Biotechnology Class, and the winners were Animal Science Class and Class 1 of Biological Sciences.

3. Final: On November 3th, it was held in the lecture hall of the School of Life Sciences. The President of the Student Union of the School of Mathematics and Information Technology and the Minister of Learning Department of the Student Union of our school were invited to watch. At the same time, we also invited the Presidium of the Student Union of the College of Life Sciences, ministers of various ministries and students from all classes to watch the battle. In the end, Class One of Biological Sciences won the championship.

(See the competition record for details)

IV. Debate procedure:

The competition procedure consists of six parts: presentation, argument, debate, concluding remarks and judges' comments. First of all, the first debate and the second debate start with the most refined language to clarify our basic position, logical framework, theoretical basis, factual materials and so on.

Then there are tit-for-tat attacks and colorful free debates, and then there are four debates for concluding remarks. Finally, the audience asks "Yes". The setting of the competition program gives consideration to both "debate" and "theory", which not only provides sufficient space for both sides of the debate to have a wonderful discussion, but also fully demonstrates their own meticulous logical framework, and also provides a stage for both sides to engage in verbal and verbal battles and face-to-face confrontation. On the one hand, the audience questioning stage can arouse the enthusiasm of the audience, and on the other hand, it can enhance the interaction between the debater and the audience. The judges' comment session not only praised the players' elegant demeanor, but also pointed out their shortcomings, and hoped that they would perform better.

V. Activity results:

We have given corresponding encouragement and rewards to the debaters and class members who have performed well.