In the national security strategy, the Communist Party of China and the Democratic Party emphasize adhering to the principle of countermeasures and adhering to social principles.

1. In fact, fundamentally speaking, it is a question of the ideals of the two parties. *** and the Party have always advocated a small government, a big society, advocating free economic competition, emphasizing the importance of personal struggle in life, cutting social welfare expenditures, reducing social security expenditures, opposing abortion, increasing military investment, and firmly believing in American exceptionalism. etc., their stance is right-leaning; while the Democratic Party’s stance is more left-leaning, leaning towards liberalism, advocating government regulation of the market, supporting abortion, increasing social security, establishing a welfare society similar to that in Europe, reducing the gap between rich and poor in the United States, and in the international order It emphasizes multilateral negotiations and cooperation with other countries; this is reflected in the main vote bases of the Democratic Party and the Democratic Party (the base of the Democratic Party and the Democratic Party is mainly energy groups, military-industrial groups, Christian conservative forces, and grassrootsism in the south. The Democratic Party’s base is Mainly liberals in Hollywood, Silicon Valley, universities, etc.) Among the disputes between the two parties on many issues, social security is the most fiercely debated. This exactly reflects the opposition of core values--if a person cannot succeed Should we blame ourselves or society? The Communist Party and the Party believe that one should blame oneself, because that person did not work hard, study hard, and therefore failed. The Democratic Party believes that society should be blamed, believing that the injustice of the social environment caused personal failure. This is the root cause. 2. Obama’s health care reform bill reflects this. The main content of the bill is: Starting from 2014, all Americans must purchase health insurance, and employers must provide insurance for employees, otherwise they will be fined. The health care reform bill will cover more than 32 million people in the United States who currently do not have health insurance, thus achieving the goal of universal health insurance. Each of these contents touches the bottom line of the Communist Party and the Party. Companies purchase medical insurance for everyone, which greatly increases the company's operating costs, puts great pressure on small and medium-sized enterprises in particular, and will weaken the international competitiveness of U.S. companies. When buying insurance for people without medical insurance, who are the main people who don’t have medical insurance? That is, those ethnic minorities and people of color, especially illegal immigrants, will be the biggest beneficiaries. This will create a motivation: to relieve the worries of illegal immigrants, especially those from Latin American countries. In the future, these Latino immigrants will only continue to increase and will not decrease, because even if they come to the United States, they have the most basic and important protection. This will exacerbate the divisions in American society. There is also the debt problem. The cost of medical care in the United States is very high. Once passed, the government will be burdened with even heavier debts, which is difficult to tolerate for the U.S. national fiscal cliff, which is already close to collapse. If Obama wants to implement his bill, he must get money. To get money, there are two ways: increase revenue; reduce expenditure. It can be difficult to achieve these two points. The majority of Americans' taxes are mainly on the middle class. Since the outbreak of the financial crisis, the number of the middle class as a class has begun to decrease significantly, and the taxes paid have naturally declined accordingly. Then the taxes will naturally It will also decrease accordingly. And military spending cannot be moved casually. Once military spending drops, those military industrial companies that rely on government orders for survival will threaten to lay off employees. Do you know how many thousands of people a Ford-class aircraft carrier can feed? Can members of Congress still be elected if they lose votes from these constituencies? Relatively speaking, the best way is to issue government bonds and implement quantitative easing. Asking for money from the international community will intensify the decline in the credit reputation of the US dollar. The world has generally complained about the Federal Reserve's quantitative easing, and financial public opinion in various countries has generally called for: Beware of the United States' quantitative easing. Once passed, it will have a huge impact on the financial status of the United States. Obama is like Lyndon Johnson, the Democratic president of the year. He proposed to build a "Great Society", wage a war on poverty, engage in an arms race with the Soviet Union, and fight the Vietnam War. Which of these would not require huge sums of money? As a result, the U.S. dollar was issued indiscriminately and beggar-thy-neighbour, paving the way for the disintegration of the Bretton Woods system and the economic depression of the 1970s. Connally, the Treasury Secretary during the Nixon era (the mayor of Dallas who was shot together with Kennedy but survived) once said: The dollar is our currency, but it is your problem. That's why Obama's health care reform is firmly opposed by the president and the party, which will pose a long-term challenge to the United States. And this is precisely what triggered the government shutdown. The two parties have been arguing over the government debt issue for a long time. An agreement could not be reached for a long time. 3. In addition to the conflicting values, there is another important reason. Think about future elections. As the proportion of white people in the U.S. population decreases, the proportion of people of color becomes larger. People of color mainly tend to vote for the Democratic Party and basically do not vote for the Democratic Party. Obama did this , will undoubtedly break the balance between political parties. This is very unacceptable to the Communist Party and the Party. Therefore, in the long run, desperately opposing the Democratic Party's health care reform plan is even for the long-term balance of the United States. 4. Finally, there are ideological conflicts. Once Obamacare is successful, the United States will become a high-welfare country similar to Europe. This is not a good thing for the United States. Historically, Americans have always looked down on Europeans who are lazy but enjoy high welfare. Mainstream economics generally believes that high welfare is the main reason for the decline in European economic competitiveness. Economists worry that high welfare for employees will weaken the enthusiasm of employees. Health care reform will have a negative impact on the enthusiasm of high-income groups and business owners.

This approach is similar to European welfare socialism and is incompatible with the free competitive environment in the United States.