What is the difference between doves and hawks in American political parties?

In the political struggle, there are moderate people and cruel people. Just as there are left-leaning and right-leaning ideas in politics, there are extremely violent political organizations and peace-loving organizations in American countries. This is the difference between hawks and doves.

Hawks are those who advocate the settlement of disputes by force. Hawks are used to describe people, groups or forces who advocate strong diplomatic means or active military expansion. Another interpretation is an individual, group or force that defends national interests with a tough attitude or means. It can be understood that this organization was born for war, and only war can soothe their hearts, so most hawkish members have capital investment from weapons companies. Only in this way can an industrial chain be formed. They advocate war, and weapons companies sell weapons and profit from them.

Doves are people who advocate solving problems by peaceful means. Doves are used to describe people, groups or forces who advocate flexible and gentle attitudes and means to deal with diplomatic and military issues. Don't think that he is a goodwill organization for every country, then you are wrong. He is only moderate in using political means. For example, Trump directly builds a wall to stop immigrants, while doves may just sign some agreements or reach some kind of plan, so that immigrants cannot pass.

Generally speaking, the two are only using different political means, but they are highly consistent with the interests of the United States. The United States dominated by hawks and the United States controlled by doves constitute a complete United States. However, in the face of national interests, "hawks" and "doves" do not have a life-and-death struggle, but both serve the global strategy of the United States.