If Syria falls, what impact will it have on China?

At present, Europe is the key to the competition between China and the United States. The future world trade pattern planned by the United States is mainly two TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement) and TIIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Agreement). The contents of these two agreements are extremely harsh, which will completely limit the possibility of developing countries transferring to the high end of the industrial chain through industrial upgrading. If we fully abide by the agreement, the third world economies will always be the low-end support of the western industrial chain, and developing countries including China will completely lose the opportunity to become developed countries. We open a map centered on the Atlantic Ocean. TPP and TIPP are like two doors. If we shut them down, China will be shut out of world trade forever.

Due to Japan's compromise with the United States, the basic TPP agreement was reached this year and now needs to be reviewed and approved by national parliaments. Germany, France and Britain are opposed to where TIPP is now. On April 20th this year, according to foreign media reports, while many European countries joined China-led AIIB, the investment and trade agreements being discussed by the United States and the European Union caused a wave of demonstrations in Europe and even around the world. People in Europe, such as Germany, Britain and Spain, took to the streets the day before yesterday to protest against Europe and the United States' plan to sign the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Agreement (TTIP), criticizing that putting the interests of big enterprises above the people, weakening the power of European governments, exploiting workers, destroying the environment and cracking down on consumers' rights and interests are tantamount to attacking democracy.

In fact, if the United States wants to gain absolute leadership in TPP and TIPP, it must deal with two major trading countries, one is Japan and the other is Germany. Japan is now almost completely obedient to the United States, while Germany is not. Otherwise, there will be no mass incidents. Germany's wish is to integrate the whole of Europe, so as to realize the rise of Europe. Will Germany give up America easily? Obviously impossible.

So will the United States give up TIPP? Obviously, it is also impossible. So is there any way to make Germany yield? There is only one trick: cut off Germany's energy. There are only two ways for Germany to solve the energy problem: north and south, the north is close to Russia, and the south gets a share from the Middle East. In the north, because of the chaos in Ukraine, it has basically been ruined. In the south, in the Middle East, if the Jewish Israel completely controls the oil hegemony, then Germany will really be forced to yield. Germany's lack of cooperation in the fight against the "Islamic State" made the United States very angry, so there was a terrorist attack made by the "Islamic State". The Greek defense minister even "boldly" let the "Islamic State" enter Germany. After the emergence of many refugees in Syria, the United States has always accused Germany of staying out of it.

It would be really foolish for Germany to help the Jewish forces solve Bashar. Strict Germans responded with silence, and then the United States used Volkswagen and Glencore events to repair Germany. Merkel's pressure can be imagined. The German Chancellor visited China this month and hoped that China and Germany could further support each other.

Therefore, the Syrian issue is related to China's national destiny, and China's high-level officials have long understood the mystery, which is why the Russian double veto on the United Nations resolution on Syria submitted by the United States shattered the Jewish fantasy.

Then bitch Hillary scolded China, and China really stepped on the American dog's tail. Here, I want to talk about Russia's sending troops to Syria. At present, it seems that Russia sent troops solely to preserve the Bashar regime. The target of air strikes is all anti-Bashar armed forces, including the "Islamic State".

Putin chose to send troops at a precise time: first, there was no breakthrough in his visit to the United States; Secondly, Germany was angered by the United States because of immigration issues and mass incidents, and Europe and the United States disagreed. Third, the suffering of Syrian refugees, especially the photos of Syrian boys floating on the beach, aroused people all over the world's anger against the "Islamic State" animals, and Russia sent troops to stand on the moral high ground. Looking back, I am afraid that the Jewish forces will have to do their best to win the dream of Syria this time. There must have been consultations between China and Russia before Russia sent troops. Russia's invasion has the same effect as China's, and Syria is geographically closer to Russia's Crimea. If the Germans hold their ground with China's support, the Syrian government forces will surely recover their lost ground.

The author believes that all political struggles and geopolitical games are ultimately for the maximization of national interests, especially economic interests. On the contrary, the success or failure of geopolitical game will have a negative impact on a country's financial policy.