Why is it that "nobody cares" is more terrible than an unmarked bus stop sign?

1 The 1 18 bus stop kiosk where the bus passes has been built for nearly a year without any signs. Passengers have to "guess" and "touch" to get on the right bus and get off the right station. Many units involved in this matter say they are not responsible. On the evening of August 1 Sunday, Hubei TV program "Outpost of Party Style and Political Style" exposed this problem in Qianjiang City.

The bus station is magnificent, but there is no sign for a year. This seems to be a trivial matter. People living nearby may be able to do it without signs, but it will still cause a lot of inconvenience, especially those who are not familiar with that area. People's livelihood is no small matter, exposure is of course necessary, and there are also many "big things" worthy of reflection behind it.

Not long ago, 45 bus shelters in Yaohai District of Hefei were exposed to illegal construction without approval procedures. Hefei Public Transport Group, urban management, municipal administration and other departments once said that they did not know who built the bus shelters. Is there a sexual problem behind the two news stories?

First of all, people have to feel the separation between decision-making and public opinion. If officials of these departments often take buses and often encounter inconvenience, will they be so indifferent? A realistic reason for not paying attention to trivial matters of people's livelihood is that some decision makers lack empathy and feelings, and they cannot understand the sufferings of people's livelihood.

Of course, what is more worthy of reflection is the mechanism. How many departments does a small bus sign involve? The reporters went to the Municipal Passenger Transport Management Office, Qianyang Road Reconstruction Command, Municipal Transportation Bureau and Municipal Urban Management Bureau respectively. After a circle, no department that can manage things has come up with a quick solution. Involving people's livelihood, the media can find out for a long time, but still can't "straighten out" who will be responsible, which shows the confusion of public affairs management mechanism.

This confusion is not only manifested in the unclear responsibilities between departments, but also in the lack of a smooth channel to reflect the opinions of the people and produce effective interaction. These bus stops and kiosks have been open for a year without any signs. There are definitely not a few people who spit. However, why did these public opinions not affect the relevant departments at all? The exposure of provincial media may "force" the local authorities to make rectification, but without such external and to some extent "superior" pressure, how citizens' opinions can be respected by government departments is a common problem worth thinking about.

The bus station has been running for a year without any signs, which belongs to the people's livelihood "accident" to some extent. After such an "accident", if no department takes responsibility and no official is held accountable, it is tantamount to saying that all government departments are the same. Of course, now the relevant departments are shirking each other, but even if there are loopholes in the mechanism, who will be responsible for this mechanism that leads to nobody's interest? When it's okay, it seems that all departments have a clear division of labor and perform their duties. If something goes wrong, they will all pass the buck. If this situation is not changed, it will be difficult to eradicate the mistake that bus stop signs are not marked.

To put it bluntly, the reason why a small matter of people's livelihood is delayed for one year is because the accountability system of grassroots governments is weak. Whether local government departments or officials are doing well or not, whether the people are satisfied or not, usually will not affect their performance appraisal. What they care about is what their superiors care about, so small things like bus signs can of course be postponed indefinitely on the agenda.