Strictly implement the principle of "one household, one house". Is it illegal if there are houses in both cities and rural areas?

Why should we implement the policy of "one household, one house"

Strictly implement the principle of "one household, one house". Is it illegal if there are houses in both cities and rural areas?

Why should we implement the policy of "one household, one house"? China's population is growing, but its land area is limited. The policy of "one household, one house" in rural areas is for the stable development of society, saving land and not wasting resources. It is possible that people will not be buried casually after death, but must be buried in a designated cemetery.

However, the implementation of the policy of "one household, one house" has been well implemented in economically developed areas, but in economically underdeveloped remote areas, the implementation is not strong, and many farmers are still building homestead privately. Many of our families with better economic conditions have more than two houses.

The closer to the city, the greater the implementation of the "one household, one house" policy, and the less the implementation in the more remote places. For example, my hometown is 30 miles away from the county seat. So far, I can build a house casually, but it is different when I am close to the city. My cousin can't just build a house. If it is not approved, even if the house is built secretly, it will be pried off.

The policy of "one household, one house" paves the way for future administration. For example, in recent years, our county has developed and built a new urban area. All rural households in the new urban area are expropriated, and residential houses are paid by developers by the square. Many people became millionaires overnight. A friend I know told me that his family used to have a shabby old wooden house. Because the new house has been unoccupied for several years, he intends to tear down the land. Later, catching up with the development of the new city, the developer suddenly lost him 500 thousand. It turns out that this is a very shabby old wooden house. He made a windfall because he caught up with the development of the new town.

Later, people there found this opportunity to get rich, and they frantically repaired their houses day and night. Some people take out loans when they have no money. Almost every family there has built several houses. Later, developers came and lost a lot of money, so many people made a fortune.

Later, the government refused to repair it, so they secretly repaired it at night. This situation lasted for more than three years before it was improved, because the house repaired later could not be compensated by the developer. If you persist in repairing, you will lose yourself.

Therefore, the government must also consider implementing the policy of "one household, one house" in rural areas. If any part of the countryside is developed, the compensation will be much less.

Trap couplets Once Emperor Qianlong visited Jiangnan incognito and saw a family holding a happy event. On a whim, he wrapped three coppers in a red envelope to congratulate him and made a couplet: three coppers to congratulate him, if you don't accept too little, you will love money. The host had a big fall, and then a poor man stood up and said that the two low rooms were for guests. Please bow your head and come in. It's delicious as soon as you enter. So the two sides smiled at each other and the wedding reception continued. A problem of Emperor Qianlong was solved by a scholar.

The entanglement of rural people. However, today, the problem of "one household, one house" has stumped farmers all over the world. Many families have three or five children going out to work. As they get married and have children, the economy has its own abacus, which is equivalent to separation. It's just that my hometown is the same house. Chinese New Year and holidays are lively, but also make elders feel happy. No one mentioned separation, and dad (some even grandpa) was the parent.

I heard that I wanted a house for one household. I used my brains one by one and immediately went to the household registration room to "allocate the house", but the answer was: you can only allocate the house if you have a homestead. This is a contradiction. The policy is "one household, one house" and the implementation is "only when there is a house can there be a household". Blocked at both ends, nowhere to go. So in rural areas, it is said that those families who quarreled all day and finally separated in the early years earned a lot of money. The implication is that family harmony is damaged, while family separation is profitable.

It's no use struggling. The goal is clear. No more housing is allowed. So if you buy a house in the city, is it illegal to have a house in the country? There seems to be no clear statement.

However, it is worth noting that if it is a house under the name of parents, after the death of parents, children with urban hukou can own the property rights of the house on the land, but the land no longer belongs to them, so the house is no longer allowed to be repaired and can only be destroyed and collapsed by him.

Therefore, the guess is that the children raised by parents with rural hukou in the city have basically been unable to go back to the countryside. With the progress of their studies and the requirements of various cities for welfare and social security policies after joining the work, the next generation basically settled in cities. Therefore, how many rural homesteads are actually useless.

What are the rules of this bullshit expert? The peasant family has grain, farm tools, livestock, chemical fertilizers, pesticides, agricultural materials, forage and so on. Can the family put it down? These experts don't eat shit, so they go to the countryside before making a decision.

What is "one household, one house"?

According to the relevant provisions of the Land Management Law, rural areas can implement the homestead management system of "one household, one house" according to law. The so-called "one house for one household" means that each household in rural areas can only own one homestead. The definition of "one household" refers to families with permanent residence in administrative villages and natural villages and members of collective economic organizations who enjoy the right to distribute collective assets in villages. Both are indispensable, and "one household" must be based on the household registration book issued by the public security organ.

Then, under the principle of "one household, one house", can both cities and rural areas have houses?

Of course you can. Why do you say that? Houses are private property, and owning houses in rural areas does not affect people's going to cities to buy commercial houses. In other words, after you bought a commercial house in the city, no one asked you to tear down the house in the countryside.

However, there are also some things that need attention: for example, your household registration is no longer the rural household registration in your village, but you moved out because of work and school, bought a house in the city, and are not allowed to go back to your hometown to rebuild the house; At the same time, you inherited the property in the hands of your parents in the countryside. This house can only be repaired and strengthened, not renovated and rebuilt. After the house collapses, the right to use the homestead associated with the house will disappear in your hands.

In addition, in the past two years, many places have enjoyed the relocation policy of relocation of county towns or small cities, and old houses in rural areas need to be retired and reclaimed. In other words, if they enjoy the relevant policies, even if they have a house in the countryside, it is illegal and does not meet the requirements of "one household, one house". Of course, this kind of retirement and reclamation is paid and should be voluntary.

The principle of one house per household is that rural people can only own one homestead (just like we already have a house at home, if we want to tear down the tile house in our hometown to build a new house, we can't apply in the name of my parents). If we move our registered permanent residence to the city, no matter whether you have a house in the city or not, you can't go back to the countryside to build a house (including tearing down the old house and rebuilding it, and the inherited one can't be renovated and rebuilt).

The so-called rural multi-family means that a rural family owns two or more homesteads, and usually the extra homesteads cannot be registered. Although the land in many areas has been confirmed now, the phenomenon that we have one more house still exists, as long as we pay a certain fee, we can still use it. Then strictly implement the principle of "one household, one house". Is it illegal if there are houses in both cities and rural areas?

Now I want to go back to my hometown to build a house or buy a house with a provident fund loan. There is a prerequisite that the account needs to be in my hometown. Farmers can buy houses in cities, but urban residents are not protected by law when they buy houses in rural areas. Therefore, friends from rural areas must be cautious when moving to cities.

With the change of life, many cities began to rob people, and more and more college students settled in cities. Of course, our rural hukou is becoming more and more valuable, especially precious.

Many people who are in favor of moving their hukou to the city think it is worthwhile to move it to the city. Because people need to live in the city for a long time because of work, they can have a comfortable and comfortable living environment. However, there are also many objections. Nowadays, the living environment and income of farmers have been significantly improved. With the construction of buildings in villages, people's spare time life has become more colorful and their quality of life has been continuously improved. The countryside is not what it used to be.

If there is more than one house in the countryside, the extra homestead can also be recovered. Just like if the house left by the deceased old man is not inherited, or the heir has not lived in the countryside for a long time. The owner of the house has not lived in the countryside for a long time. Now many urban residents will buy houses in rural areas, but the homestead is still collectively owned. The house collapsed, and the homestead was recovered after it had not been repaired for more than two years.

Rural houses have no commodity attributes, while urban houses have commodity attributes and can be bought and sold. Urban land belongs to the state, and rural land belongs to the rural collective. Therefore, houses in cities can be bought and sold at will, while those in rural areas can only be circulated within collective economic organizations. Houses in cities have a service life, while rural homesteads can continue to be used as long as the houses do not collapse. Another is that when buying a house in the city, the buyer needs to pay the relevant land taxes and fees. In rural areas, there is no need to pay land fees for building houses.

In fact, "one household with multiple rooms" in rural areas can be divided into legal cases and illegal cases. For example, Liu Fang said that if we want to inherit the house or the cases caused by various reasons are legal, we can confirm the right. If it is illegal, it is impossible to confirm the right.

Urban housing and rural housing are two different things, and there is no related contradiction.

abstract:

Liu Fang still advises friends to move cautiously, especially when we move from the countryside to the city, because it basically means you have to give up everything in the countryside. Once you move to the city, let alone the use of rural fields, it is very difficult for you to go back to your hometown to build a house, and the difficulty of moving back is unimaginable, and most villagers have to sign and agree.

Strictly implement the principle of one household and one house. Is it illegal if there are houses in both cities and rural areas?

The policy of "one household, one house" is aimed at rural collective land, which is not contradictory to state-owned homestead. Farmers have homesteads in rural areas and buy houses in cities, which does not violate the principle of one household and one house. The buildings in the city are all built on state-owned land and belong to a kind of commodity homestead. No matter who it is, as long as it is rich, it is not illegal to buy several sets. Rural land belongs to all farmers in the village. The policy of "one household, one house" is not only to save and rationally use land, but also to embody the principle of fairness. If it is not stipulated in this way, whoever has the ability can take more, which takes up everyone's interests. In addition, rural land is used to develop agriculture. If it is not restricted, the land will be wasted, which will ultimately affect food security.

With the development of urbanization, more and more farmers go to cities to buy houses, and there are not a few people who already own several houses. If there is only one homestead in the village, whether it is left by ancestors or newly built, it is legal. As long as the household registration is still in the countryside, farmers should enjoy the right to a homestead according to law, and they should not be deprived of the right to enjoy the homestead just because they bought a house in the city. Farmers buy houses in cities. Houses in rural areas no longer live, and they can be resold or recovered with compensation, but they can never be forcibly recovered.

The policy of "one household, one room" is a special policy of rural homestead. The ownership of rural homestead belongs to the village collective, but it can be provided to members of collective economic organizations for free. Farmers can obtain the right to use homestead in collective economic organizations and build houses on it free of charge. However, this free use is not unlimited, that is to say, villagers can only use one rural homestead. This is a one-room policy.

But the buildings in the city are all commercial buildings, and the land use right is not free. Developers spend money to obtain land use rights, and then allocate land use rights to residents who buy buildings. In other words, land use rights and purchase records of urban buildings cost money. Except for the purchase restriction orders of a few cities, most cities have no restrictions on how many houses citizens can own, and farmers have no restrictions on buying houses in cities. They only buy second or more suites. If you take out a loan, the down payment ratio will be higher. There are few other preferential policies.

For farmers, the right to use the homestead in the village and then buy a house in the city does not violate the regulations, and it is advocated by superiors, because all localities are promoting urbanization and farmers are welcome to enter the city. Therefore, for farmers, owning houses in rural areas and cities does not violate laws and regulations.

But you didn't identify yourself, so you can't tell whether you are a farmer or an urban hukou. If you have an urban hukou, you can't buy a house in the countryside. In this case, if you have a house in the city and then buy a house in the countryside, it is obviously illegal, but it has nothing to do with the "one household, one room" policy. The policy of "urban population is not allowed to buy houses in rural areas". However, if you have urban household registration, but you used to have the right to use the homestead when you were in the countryside, or you inherited the house left by your parents in the countryside, this is not infringement, but you will not be able to deal with the property of the house you own in the countryside. It can't be used permanently and can't be rebuilt. When the house collapses and can no longer be used, the right to use the homestead will be revoked.

To sum up, "one household, one room" is only a restriction on the right to use rural homestead, and has nothing to do with urban housing. Rural and urban houses owned by farmers fully meet the requirements.

Hello everyone, Mark, Inner Mongolia is very happy to answer this question. Judging from the existing policies and regulations, "one household, one house" is a policy specifically aimed at rural areas. Refers to farmers with rural hukou. You can only have one homestead under the name of a household in the village, and there is no restriction on buying a house in the city, so it is reasonable and legal for you to have a house in both rural and urban areas. If you are a city hukou, that's another matter. You can't own a house in the countryside and you can't buy or sell land in the countryside. Therefore, it is illegal for citizens with urban hukou to own houses in rural areas. A series of policies issued by the state are aimed at preventing the indiscriminate development of land and ensuring rational utilization.

Q: Strictly implement the principle of "one household, one house". Is it illegal if there are houses in both cities and rural areas? A: There are houses in cities and houses in rural areas, which do not belong to the rule of one household and one house. It's not illegal.

Understanding of the rule of one household, one house. The so-called "one house for one household" means that in rural areas, one household can only own one homestead. The premise is in rural areas, and it is within the collective scope of the same village in rural areas. A household refers to the family population registered in the household registration book, 1~3 people are small, 4~5 people are medium, and families with more than 6 people are large. House refers to the homestead. The use area of homestead is determined according to the family population in the household registration book, and the per capita residential use area is 25~40 square meters. Usually, the village Committee applying for homestead in rural areas is generally approved by 25 square meters per person. Building on barren hills, the use area of homestead can be appropriately relaxed.

The nature of buying a house in the city. Since the country stepped up the pace of urbanization, cities around the country have gradually liberalized the conditions for farmers to settle in cities and encouraged qualified farmers to buy houses and settle in cities. Of course, farmers buy houses in cities, and the policy is to encourage them to move their hukou to cities. If farmers buy houses in cities, they will not be forced to move their accounts. Farmers can keep their rural hukou. The commercial housing purchased by farmers in cities belongs to the commercial housing nature of state-owned construction land, that is, the house is private and the land is state-owned. In cities that are not limited to purchase, a farmer can buy multiple sets of commercial houses in cities, and the land use right of commercial houses is only 70 years. After the expiration of 70 years, if the house still has residential use value, farmers who buy commercial housing will continue to pay land transfer fees before they can continue to use commercial housing. If the 70-year use period expires and the house collapses and becomes uninhabitable, the state will recover the land for the construction of commercial housing. Commercial housing purchased by farmers in cities can be transferred and sold at any time during the land transfer period. So many wealthy farmers don't necessarily buy houses in cities, but buy houses to make money.

The nature of rural homestead. Rural homestead belongs to the village collective, and only villagers have the right to use it. Moreover, unlike urban commercial housing construction land, rural residential land has a service life. Rural homestead is approved by the village collective for farmers to build houses for free. Homestead that meets the requirements of one household and one house does not need to pay the land transfer fee, and can be used as a member of the rural collective indefinitely. We can't occupy more rural homesteads just because they are granted free of charge, and one household can only occupy one homestead. In September this year, after the implementation of the farmland occupation tax law, the certificate of rural homestead ownership will be promoted in 2020. For the homestead outside one household and one house, either the right is not confirmed, or the right registration is allowed after the farmland occupation tax is levied. Some people say that rural homesteads are not free at all, and many of them are bought. Here, it needs to be clear that buying a homestead from someone else is a transfer of rights and interests, and free of charge means no farmland occupation tax. When buying land from farmers to make urban commercial housing, we should also make economic compensation to farmers, pay land transfer fees to the state, and pay housing purchase tax when doing real estate licenses. Rural homestead is not tax-free. You buy homestead from farmers, which is the transfer fee of the right to use, and you have not paid taxes to the state.

To sum up, urban commercial housing does not belong to the norms of one household and one house in rural areas. It is not illegal to have a house in the city and a house in the countryside. Is it illegal to have a house in both urban and rural areas? The most important core point is the hukou, that is, whether you are a rural hukou or an urban hukou.

If you are a rural hukou, there is a homestead in the countryside and the city buys a house, this is not illegal. The policy of "one household, one house" implemented in rural areas is aimed at rural hukou, or it can be said that it is only aimed at rural hukou personnel. Only one household is allowed to have a homestead in rural areas, and the right to use the homestead is permanent. As long as it does not exceed it, it is not illegal.

If you are an urban hukou, it depends on whether you have a house in both towns and rural areas. If your rural house is inherited from your parents, it is not illegal, but you have the right to use the house. Moreover, it is impossible to repair and transform the house. After the house collapsed, the village Committee recovered the homestead.

If your house is bought in the countryside, it is illegal, invalid and not protected by law.

Generally speaking, it is not illegal to own a house in both urban and rural areas. It mainly depends on where your household registration is. It is not illegal for a city household registration to inherit the house of rural parents.