Rural arable land can be redistributed.

Rural arable land can be redistributed.

First of all, continuing to extend the contract can keep cultivated land intensive and improve efficiency. At present, there is still room for improvement in rural land intensification. Comparatively speaking, land redistribution will make some people have more cultivated land, but their share of cultivated land will also decline, which will eventually lead to a decline in benefits. Therefore, it is feasible to continue to delay packaging.

Secondly, continue to expand the package to facilitate management and resource utilization. After the redistribution of cultivated land, the rural population may be scattered and it is difficult to centralize management. At the same time, there is the problem of demolition of cultivated land, and the overall utilization efficiency of cultivated land will also decline. Continuing to extend the contract will help to provide more convenient management for high-quality land.

The destruction of cultivated land here not only refers to illegal occupation of land and abuse of pesticides, but also includes unreasonable planting methods. Such people have caused damage to the land and should bear certain responsibilities. However, when punishing these people, we should handle the problem more carefully and give full consideration to those who have relevant vital interests. Formal punishment may not solve the problem, but the balance of interests can truly realize the fairness of the process.

Generally speaking, the introduction of the policy is helpful to realize the rational allocation of land resources and improve land use efficiency and grain output. In the process of policy implementation, we should take into account the balance between people's livelihood and resource utilization, put people first, formulate policies and measures at all levels more accurately, and explore the specific measures and possible impacts of this policy implementation.