For children's education, which is more cost-effective to immigrate to Australia or study in Australia?

Hello, in the long run, immigration is more cost-effective.

Tuition is lower than that of international students.

In China, parents usually send their children abroad to study, so that they can finish their undergraduate courses before continuing their graduate studies. After four years of college and one to two years of postgraduate study, the accumulated expenses for studying abroad are obviously not a small expense. If this money is used for immigration, it will be more than enough. If the child gets Australian status, the tuition fee of the child will be about 1/3 lower than that of international students, and he can also apply for interest-free loans from the government.

Part-time job is more convenient.

As an immigrant student studying in Australia, there are obvious advantages in both part-time jobs at school and employment after graduation. With Australian status, children can work during their studies to accumulate work experience and subsidize their living expenses. Although international students can also work part-time, they should not work more than 20 hours a week during normal school hours.

In addition, international students need to get a work visa at a specific time after graduation, or they have to return to China. After graduation, students with immigrant background not only need not worry about being deported, but also need not worry about being exploited by employers because of their identity problems.

High admission opportunity

It is easier for children who are immigrants to study abroad and get into prestigious schools. Compared with international students, children with Australian resident status are more likely to be admitted to high-quality schools and have more room to choose majors, because some majors in Australia are not open to international students.