We don't deserve it

Recently, the results of the college entrance examination have come out, and there are wails and hot spots on the Internet. The most prominent is probably the score line in Fujian, which jumped from the original national countdown to the fourth in the country.

And many people will point the finger at-"college entrance examination immigrants." After the adoption of the national college entrance examination in Fujian province, the scores have been relatively low, so some families of candidates in the big province of college entrance examination use the way of buying a house in Fujian to achieve the purpose of taking the college entrance examination in Fujian province.

In fact, the "college entrance examination immigration" occurred as early as the second half of 20 17, and the government also took measures, but it could not resist this "immigration tide". Of course, it is not that all the reasons for the rise in scores are "immigrants from the college entrance examination", but simple test papers are also part of the reason. But ..... immigration is one of the reasons.

As for "college entrance examination immigrants", there are different opinions. Someone said, "The same piece of paper should have the same score line ... why is your score line so low and unfair?" "Who can blame for your lack of ability?" "You deserve it." . Some people curse "college entrance examination immigrants".

I must admit that Fujian's education development is not as good as that of Jiangsu and Zhejiang, and there are some problems in Fujian's education. But ..... I don't think our low marks are "incompetent" and "unfair" to Fujian candidates at all. The result of this year's score increase is that we "deserve it".

Everyone is profit-seeking. A year ago, I was also a college entrance examination student, putting myself in Fujian's shoes. If I'm not from Fujian, if I'm in a big college entrance examination province, it's hard for me to reach the forefront of the province, but I can come to Fujian. This temptation is really great.

As far as I know, most schools in many provinces with college entrance examinations practice cramming education, which is seriously out of touch with quality education. For example, eating at a specified time, washing your hair once every two days will be called to talk, there will be no physical education class, no extracurricular activities and so on. In contrast, most schools in Fujian are quality-oriented education, with many community activities, physical education elective courses in line with universities, and rich after-school life. Two different teaching models, plus Fujian has a small population, and most of the provinces in the college entrance examination are populous, with different starting points, different objective conditions and different major premises. How to compare them?

There are two different teaching modes with different emphases, so there is no saying that Fujian candidates are "incompetent". What's more, can a person's ability only be measured by scores?

Hu Shi has a saying, "People often say that Eastern civilization is spiritual civilization and Western civilization is material civilization. This is a rumor made up by exaggerated people to cover up our shame. All civilizations have two parts: matter is matter, and mind and wisdom that use matter are spirit. The more complete and complex the artifacts, the more spiritual factors. We can't sit on the sampan and brag about spiritual civilization, but laugh at the 50,000-ton steamboat as a material civilization. "

Fujian candidates are not good at exam-oriented education, but many people can afford a large-scale activity in high school. Is this a lack of ability? Isn't this the same as "sitting on rags and boasting about spiritual civilization and laughing at the fact that the 50,000-ton steamboat is material civilization"? Same reason?

After studying politics for so many years, everyone should know a truth: "Fairness is never absolute, but relative."

As mentioned earlier, Fujian's education model and population are different from other provinces, which also determines that it is impossible to achieve absolute fairness. When Fujian province introduced the policy of restricting "college entrance examination immigration", some parents shouted "This is unfair to us, we bought a house." But ..... is this the so-called "fairness"? Is "college entrance examination immigration" a kind of "fairness"? Is this the so-called "high ability"?

Associate Professor Guan Jian said in the article, "For a society, if there are too many smart people, the society will be corroded, from spirit to body, from morality to behavior. The whole society will be in a state of collective anomie. "The wisdom of loopholes" and "the philosophy of loopholes" have destroyed order, lost principles and undermined equality and fairness. ..... If there are loopholes in consciousness and psychological loopholes, it is the most harmful. " "College entrance examination immigrants" will give people a feeling of "taking advantage". Under the balance of collective interests and personal interests, we choose to sacrifice collective interests in exchange for personal interests. It is this seemingly fair behavior that undermines fairness.

So, how about the candidates in Fujian-"worthy"? Obviously the biggest victim.

"College Entrance Examination Immigrants", I know that you were probably brushing your papers when we were in physical education class, and you were also brushing your papers at the May 4th Garden Party. We are still sleeping, and you left the playground in the morning ... I understand your hard work, inner helplessness and unwillingness, and I know that you may be better at exam-oriented education, but this does not mean that you are superior, nor does it mean that Fujian candidates are "incompetent".

You are innocent, and so are Fujian candidates. Don't let innocent people become victims of picking up loopholes and drilling them.