What should be Sweden's position on the protection of civilians in armed conflict?

Just open a model couplet, alas, just for fun. I'm just saying, you just have to listen. It better work. If I am wrong, don't scold me.

Sweden has always been strictly neutral, taking promoting peace and democracy in Europe and America as its own responsibility internationally, and has done a lot of work to help underdeveloped areas and war-torn areas. It can be said that under the background of species conflict, Sweden's position should be mainly in three aspects.

1. Political aspects

Any country's international speech is based on political interests. Therefore, to determine Sweden's attitude in this armed conflict, we must first determine the conflict background, such as the identity, behavior and supporters of both parties to the conflict. You should stand up and condemn some things that are against humanity and the whole world. For those who oppose the forces that have a good relationship with them, you can have a short meeting with your brothers to express unclear support and acquiescence. For those who have a relationship with themselves, you can unite your opponents to suppress them.

However, you must not be alone. Sweden, a country with low military prestige, cannot lead the way. If the EU takes the lead, it will follow the EU. If America takes the lead, it will follow America. Generally speaking, the five permanent members of the Security Council must be divided on this issue. Just follow big brother and say something irrelevant from time to time to express your neutral attitude.

2. Assistance.

Sweden is very active on this issue. If you are a representative of the movement for democracy in Liberia, you should strongly urge the United Nations organizations to provide assistance and launch various rescue operations. But the diplomacy of small countries should also be based on the domestic situation. At present, the problem of immigration in Sweden is quite acute. Do not accept a large number of immigrants. Europe is also in an economic crisis and may not have much money. So don't make the scale of aid too large, or Germany will be extremely dissatisfied with you. First, we should unify our views with Europe, and then work together with big bosses such as China and the United States to earn a reputation, show neutrality and get things done. Of course, if big names like China and the United States are not interested in you, you should be as self-aware as Sweden.

3. Peacekeeping

As a neutral country and an advocate of non-violence, Sweden should only emphasize that the United Nations should do more and send troops to keep peace less. Otherwise, the elder brothers will be unhappy and let the bosses do whatever they want within the framework of the United Nations. Just vote behind the big European countries and the United States. Since it is not a very important country and has no military capability, be quiet, not to mention peacekeeping. While condemning the violence, he called on all countries to find a solution at the United Nations, but he did not say that peacekeeping troops should be sent or anything else.

Finally, as a model representative in the Model United Nations, don't be too patriotic. You are simulating the efforts of the United Nations for Sweden, Europe and the United States. You should not be soft when trying to shift the responsibility to some big developing countries, because they always do so in reality.

In fact, it is very simple to sum up. We will reach an agreement with Europe and America at a small meeting to keep up with the pace of big brother. Properly express your position and never put forward military peacekeeping; Take proper responsibility for rescue and prevent refugees from entering China.

Well, that's about it. I wrote it and thought about it. I hope it helps you.

Well, by the way, when I saw the topic, I subconsciously thought that an armed conflict broke out outside Sweden. That's right.