There is a homestead in the countryside. Should people who buy a house in the city quit the homestead? what do you think?

The countryside is their rear area, the land resources and trees in the countryside are their fixed income, the rural homestead is their daily life guarantee in the countryside, and there is no contradiction between the rural homestead and their house in the city. Many families in our village have been working for a long time. After making money, they first build a house in their hometown. Now they have jobs and savings, and the trees in the sellers earn a lot of money. It is easy to buy a house in the county and live in both the country and the city.

Migrant workers work in cities, and their contribution to urban capital construction is indelible. They worked hard in cities and bought their own houses in big cities with their own hardships and diligence. However, some enterprises they work in the city enjoy social security benefits, while others do not. If they are unemployed in the city, the rural homestead is their rear road and the guarantee of their daily life for the rest of their lives, because most of them are rural hukou and will return to the countryside when they reach a certain age.

Because the house bought in the city and the homestead in the countryside are two different things, which are not in an existing policy. Houses in the city are both commercial and residential, and everyone can trade. This is just the sale of a commodity. For example, some people in the city have several properties that are reasonable and legal, but in rural areas, it is illegal to own more than one house without proper reasons, but it is against the regulations. Therefore, they are not within the current policy of a starting line.

Some people's accounts have moved to other places, or emigrated to invest overseas. Even if mom and dad die, as long as the house exists in detail, the house belongs to the owner. However, the right to use the homestead no longer belongs to this relocated household, but to the village collective. Due to the law, only outstanding people with collective household registration in the village have the ownership of rural homestead. Is there a big difference between the house belonging to the owner and the rural homestead not belonging to the owner? Therefore, there are also requirements that the owner can always own this house only if the house has not collapsed and been destroyed. Because we have this house, no one will tear it down on purpose.