What did the interviewer say in response to the recruitment dispute?

The interviewer said that he was stimulated by the interviewer, so he made a radical move.

I felt particularly ridiculous when I saw this news, because an interviewer should have been stimulated by the interviewer, and because of this, he would make an excessive move. I think the psychological quality of the interviewer is so poor that even such a response can only be called an excuse.

The interviewer discriminated against the interviewer first.

The interviewer is from Li Li. When the interviewer was interviewing candidates, the interviewer claimed that students from Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications were not qualified to come to Mile Mile. For ordinary people, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications is already a good school, but the interviewers are particularly arrogant. He thinks that only people from Tsinghua and Peking University are qualified to work here. The interviewer was very upset and posted the news online.

The interviewer made a formal response.

As I said at the beginning of my reply, the interviewer's response is ridiculous, because the interviewer said that he was stimulated by the interviewer, so he would make such an unreasonable move. The interviewer said that the interviewer was suspected of showing off his wealth, because the interviewer said that he was financially free just to dream of working in Mile Mile, otherwise he would have emigrated to the United States. When the interviewer heard these words, he said what the students of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications actually said.

This response simply doesn't hold water.

I don't know what degree this interviewer is. This interviewer probably graduated from Tsinghua or Peking University. I don't know what qualifications he has to discriminate against students of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications. I also think this response is untenable, because an interviewer needs to have basic professional ethics. If he doesn't even have this psychological quality, I don't think this person is suitable for working in the workplace, let alone HR. If this person will really do something drastic because of other people's remarks, I think this person needs to strengthen his professional quality first, and then consider taking part in the work.