Ask the English immigration law to translate the emperor.

7B) According to Article 320(7C), if the applicant has violated the following provisions of the British Immigration Act:

(1) overstaying;

(2) Violating the regulations of the Immigration Bureau. (For example, a student visa can't work more than 20 hours, and a work visa can't be a boss. This can't be translated directly, which makes me confused. )

(3) illegal entry;

(four) the use of any false documents to apply for all kinds of visas (including short-term visits, family visits, study abroad, permanent residence).

Unless the applicant:

(1) overstaying for 28 days or less and voluntarily leaving the UK without (directly or indirectly) using the British taxpayer's money;

(2) Deception in visa application can occur ten years ago.

(3)1more than 2 months ago; Leave Britain voluntarily at one's own expense, instead of using taxpayers' money (directly or indirectly). Note: If you have applied for welfare here, it is with taxpayers' money.

(4) Use taxpayers' money and leave the UK voluntarily. But this happened two years ago, or even longer. Leave the UK within 6 months after the repatriation decision is made by the UK Immigration Service. Or leave Britain within six months after the court's decision. The two dates are subject to the latest date.

(5) Leaving the UK voluntarily (directly or indirectly) at the expense of British taxpayers five years ago;

It was ten years ago that he was repatriated or deported.

When a variety of violations of immigration laws occur, only the one who has been away from Britain for the longest time due to violations will be bound by this clause.

Oh, it's too long. I used to watch it often and didn't need translation. Plus points, otherwise it's not interesting enough. If you still don't understand, just ask me. I used to study the terms of immigration.