In football, who has more historical influence, the white star or the black star?

Unlike the NBA, where blacks dominate the world, the status of whites in football is not lost to blacks at all, and even whites have many advantages. For example, Pele and Sebbio are black, and Cristiano Ronaldo is a hybrid, but Diego Diego Maradona and Stefano are both white, cruyff and beckenbauer, Platini are also white, and Zidane Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo are all white in the new generation of champions.

Let's talk about the advantage of white people in the national team, which is almost overwhelming. Several powerful countries in the World Cup, Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Argentina, are almost all dominated by white players. Germany, Italy, Spain and other countries seem to have no blacks before 2000, while France, England, the Netherlands and Brazil are half-to-half. There are a little more white stars in England and the Netherlands, such as Matthews cruyff and Van Basten. Bergkamp, Owen, Beckham, Shearer, Van Persie, Robben, gascoyne and, of course, Rijkaard, Gullit, paul ince and Ferdinand are among the black stars. In France and Brazil, which are dominated by immigrant stars, most of the stars are black, such as Pele, Rivera, Wawa, Cristiano Ronaldo, rivaldo, romario, Carlos, Ronaldinho, Henry, Thuram and Trezeguet, but there are still some white stars such as Zidane, cantona, Platini, Ribelli, Zico, Socrates, zagallo and Kaka. It can be seen that the white star occupies an overwhelming advantage.

It seems that the White Star has a higher historical position, but because the two most popular ball kings Pele and Cristiano Ronaldo were born in the Black Star, they won six World Cups in total, while Diego Diego Maradona only had 1, and the plum ball king returned empty-handed, which looks more weighty. So in terms of influence, who is more influential, the white star or the black star in football?