Which immigrant is better, Malta or Cyprus or Hungary or Latvia?

Conversely, as far as the current immigration policy is concerned, Latvia does not recommend it, and it is also a problem that the economy cannot keep up with tourism;

In Hungary, it was 250,000 euros in 20 14, but it has been changed to 300,000 euros this year, mainly because the application time is fast enough to get back the funds later, and there are still many applicants;

Besides, in Cyprus, 300,000 euros can buy a house to live permanently, but the house can't be sold, and if it is sold, it will lose its identity. There are also 2.5 million euros of investment properties that can be directly obtained with EU passports. If the funds are sufficient, this is a good choice;

Finally, Malta, which is also a passport project, requires applicants to donate 650,000 euros, purchase 350,000 euros/rent 80,000 euros for five years, and national debt 6,543.8+0.5 million euros, which adds up to 6,543.8+0,654.38+0.5 million euros.

In contrast, it is definitely the best to get an EU passport directly, but the demand for funds is large. Hungary is the most cost-effective of the four countries. If you want to immigrate to Europe, Portugal and Greece are good now, and buying a house is also good. If you don't restrict countries, you might as well go to Global Migration Network and compare several immigration projects to see which one is more suitable.