Immigrated to the town to grow vegetables.

As the saying goes, "one acre of garden is worth ten acres of land"! It shows that most farmers know that the added value of growing vegetables is greater than that of traditional crops such as rice. But in fact, many rural people have not chosen to grow vegetables, but have been planting traditional crops such as rice. Why? Because many farmers want to make a fortune by growing vegetables, but suffer from the lack of a smooth vegetable sales environment, they give up the idea of growing vegetables to make a fortune. Because vegetables belong to fresh crops, under certain planting conditions, the added value of planting is relatively large, but it is not as easy to preserve as traditional crops such as rice. If the sales are not smooth, the loss rate is very large; Moreover, the investment in vegetable planting is greater than that in traditional crops, and large-scale commercial planting also requires certain planting techniques and experience. Therefore, although the economic value of planting cash crops such as vegetables seems to be higher than that of planting crops such as rice, it is also in the case of smooth vegetable sales. If local farmers have the experience and technology to grow vegetables commercially and have a smooth sales environment, growing vegetables is definitely more valuable than growing rice, and vice versa, otherwise many farmers will grow vegetables and become rich.

For example, our local area is 3 kilometers away from the town and 25 kilometers away from the county seat. However, people in our village still mainly grow traditional crops. Because of this geographical location, the local area is not a vegetable production base, and there is no good sales environment for growing vegetables. The sales of vegetables in the town are limited, the vegetable farmers in the town occupy the sales share, and the middle school toilets in the town have free organic fertilizer. The production cost of vegetables is low, and the planting technology and experience are high. The villagers have no advantage over them in growing vegetables. There are also many vegetable plantations in suburban towns around the county seat, while the fresh-keeping transportation of vegetables grown in distant rural areas invisibly increases the production cost, and the same competition cannot compete with vegetable farmers around the county seat. In other words, a village with a geographical location like ours does not have a good sales environment for growing vegetables, nor is it a vegetable planting base. If several villages grow vegetables with a single variety and no scale, buyers are reluctant to come and buy them. If the sales of commercial vegetables are not smooth, they will lose money. So no one in the village will make a fortune by growing vegetables in the village.

However, there are still people in the village who grow vegetables to get rich. They transferred their land and went to suburban towns around the city to rent land and grow vegetables to get rich. According to the feedback in recent years, after mastering the technology and experience of commercial vegetable planting, there are several families in our village who have planted vegetables outside the city, and the production efficiency is much higher than that of farmers who grow traditional crops in the village. Those families, relying on suburban towns and villages with good vegetable sales environment to rent land and grow vegetables to get rich, all bought several properties in the county, which is also a small achievement.

These facts can explain the problem well. Rural people do not grow traditional crops such as rice, which requires not only planting experience and technology, but also a good environment for selling vegetables. After all, fresh products such as vegetables have a short shelf life and can be sold in time, so it can be said that planting vegetables is more economical than planting traditional crops such as rice.