Job Recruitment Website - Immigration policy - For the poor, what is the difference between ancient juren and current undergraduates?

For the poor, what is the difference between ancient juren and current undergraduates?

= _ = Hehe! If we use the golden theory, the ancient juren killed today's postdoctoral fellow! Should belong to today's academician level. This is really unparalleled!

= _ = As far as undergraduates are concerned, they are a lot worse than secondary school students thirty years ago! You can consult the older generation and find that the enrollment rate of primary schools in those days may not be as high as that of universities today; The enrollment rate in universities is much higher than that in junior high schools! This is the status quo of the popularization of elite education and scum education.

= _ = One in a hundred is an elite, and one in a hundred can make you worry. If you pick it repeatedly, it will be bad to pick it all! So don't talk about foreign education, it's cheap and easy to get! Studying in colleges and universities is casual, and scum is finished after all! Without real talent and practical learning, diplomas can be bought; Opportunism is always wrong! How to face the reality?

First of all, I think whether it is modern or ancient, the gold list produced by the imperial examination system and the undergraduates who graduated from modern higher education have nothing to do with poverty.

In ancient times, it was necessary to study hard to becomeno. 1.

And modern higher education also requires you to study hard to graduate.

The current college entrance examination should not be directly compared with the ancient imperial examination. Imperial examination is a system of selecting (partially training) officials; The college entrance examination is just an ordinary college entrance examination.

If compared in detail, the college entrance examination is more like an entrance examination. If you pass it, you can get an identity and study qualification.

The imperial examination is different.

In addition, there are differences between taking an undergraduate course and taking an imperial examination.

1. The undergraduate examination has a clear goal at the time of registration-to be admitted to the university. Not in the imperial examination.

2. Juren and Jinshi are officials, not officials. Almost all students are enrolled in the undergraduate examination, but no officials are recruited.

The imperial examination is graded, and you can't take a high-level exam without passing the low-level exam. The undergraduate exam is basically the knowledge of the exam, not the topic.

4. The high-level attention is also different. In the end, the imperial examination requires the emperor to enter the palace in person, and the undergraduate examination is the way for the government to popularize culture and education.

05. Because the imperial examination was an ancient system for electing government officials, once the champion was elected, it meant that a person was promoted to a higher position and made a fortune.

The establishment of modern college entrance examination system is based on improving national cultural quality. It is only the representative of knowledge, and has nothing to do with professional titles.

Juren in ancient times is equivalent to college students now. Because you can only be an examiner (civil servant) if you are promoted, and you can only engage in public affairs if you are promoted, that is, be an official.

During the 296 years of Qing Dynasty, Fujian, Jiangxi, Henan and other places immigrated to Hainan, with nearly two million people, administering Qiongzhou, Danzhou, Wanzhou and Yazhou, and managing Qiongshan, Wenchang, Ding 'an, Chengmai, Changjiang, Wanning, Qionghai, Qiongzhong, Dongfang and Ledong counties. At the end of Guangxu, the population of Hainan exceeded one million.

In Hainan, there were only 234 juren in the whole Qing Dynasty. During the whole 296 years, millions of people lived, and it took Hainan an average of more than a year to get a juren. This shows how difficult it is to get a candidate in the exam. Modern postdoctoral fellows are much worse than juren, let alone modern undergraduates. Of course, the contribution of society is not identity and fame, but people's ability and achievements, which contribute to society, benefit the people and benefit future generations.

Juren is already a county official. Worst of all, he can enjoy telecommuting and tax exemption from thousands of acres of land. The poor can get rich overnight and become aristocratic local tyrants enjoying various privileges. This is a typical example to explain why Juren was so happy in Jin Fan's exam that he was crazy.

At that time, Hai Rui, a famous Hainan star, was only a juren, but because of his integrity, fearlessness of powerful people and daring to punish corrupt officials and nobles, he became famous throughout the ages, with Bao Zheng in the north and Hai Rui in the south.

In short, it is more difficult to get into a candidate than to ascend to heaven. If the poor can be admitted to a candidate, they will not only become an official and make a fortune, but also become rich overnight, eclipsing future generations and making people dream of learning sages' poems.

During the Ming and Qing Dynasties, those who passed the township examination became scholars, those who passed the government examination became juren, those who passed the capital examination became scholars, and those who passed the palace examination became flower pickers, second place and champion respectively. Juren's position is obviously higher than that of ordinary people, and he has the qualification to be an official. The highest can be the county master book, the nine-product official, and the competent education department. Of course, the ancient imperial examination system is completely different from modern education. If only from the knowledge level, juren is equivalent to a scholar in a key university now, who will be alive at that time? Sprinkle, food and clothing. Therefore, in some places, local candidates admitted to universities are called "top scholars" and students with excellent grades are called "top scholars in college entrance examination", which is inappropriate. In modern society and education, it is best to evaluate students' test scores and degrees according to modern objective reality.

Before 1990, all college students (including junior college students and secondary school students) were equivalent to the ancient senior high school entrance examination (free tuition, monthly living expenses, transfer to commodity grain account, graduation package distribution, formal preparation and full financial supply). From the moment they got the admission notice, rural children really entered heaven, and now they are really favored by heaven.

For the poor:

In ancient times, the policies given by the state were tolerant, preferential and beneficial, otherwise, there would be no story of "living in Fan Jinzhong". In ancient times, it was a matter of ancestor worship, which can be likened to "one person gets it, and chickens and dogs ascend to heaven" ... The most important thing is the employment rate 100%. Regardless of the distribution of state packages, they are all civil servants and iron rice bowls. Generally speaking, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. ...

Nowadays, undergraduates can be seen everywhere ... compared with ancient juren, it is a world of difference, and neither gold content nor employment rate can be compared! Talking too much is all tears.

Juren was a state official in ancient times. It means being an official! The future is boundless! So what are the undergraduates now? Countries do not include distribution. If you can't get into a civil servant or institution after graduation, you have to find a job yourself, mostly for work! So the difference is too big!

In ancient times, people's promotion was the integration of fame and employment. Fame is an official or alternate official. Undergraduate students are only certified at the academic level and cannot be confused with the appointment of officials. There is a huge difference between the two in essence and there is no comparability. The only thing that matters is that they are all selected from scholars.

All I know is that being accepted by a juror in ancient times will definitely be recorded in the genealogy, because it is a matter of glorifying our ancestors. Now that I have taken the undergraduate course, I can't get into the genealogy.