What are the civilian high technologies in China?

The general won the battle, not just on the battlefield.

First, the barrel theory, the water capacity of a barrel depends on the shortest piece of wood that makes up the barrel. The shorter the board of the shortest board, the less water the barrel can hold.

Observing China with the barrel theory, we can find that economy is the biggest shortcoming of China, while science and technology is the biggest shortcoming of China's economy, so China's biggest shortcoming lies in science and technology, because low-medium dual-use technology can be obtained through foreign trade of products or technologies, and military high technology is not China's biggest shortcoming, so China's biggest shortcoming lies in civilian high technology.

Therefore, the biggest shortcoming of China lies in civilian high technology.

Unfortunately, both internal and external conditions hinder the development of civil high technology in China. Internally, traditional culture resists innovation, and innovations that require huge financial support often become projects that enterprises spontaneously resist. Externally, after the developed countries boycotted the export of civilian high-tech, excluding the factors that artificially resisted the development of China, civilian high-tech is the treasure of many countries. In many developed countries, civilian high-tech is only used for domestic sales, first-class products for personal use, second-rate products for export, and third-rate products for foreign aid.

In the world foreign trade, the trade of civil high-tech products is the leader of the world foreign trade. Among the trillions of foreign trade in the world every year, military foreign trade is only a few hundred billion yuan, and even a big military foreign trade country cannot get rich by military foreign trade.

China gains profits from foreign trade, at the same time, it seizes the commanding heights and initiative of foreign trade, breaks the economic and technological blockade of developed countries on China, develops civilian high technology, and relies on foreign trade exporting high-tech civilian products to gain profits. This is the core.

Second, a perfect economic model needs to be achieved through constant self-correction.

Double-cat brand economic model is actually a transitional economic model, which focuses on solving the problem of free exploration of economic model under the condition of rigid thinking, so it is far from a mature economic model. Later (economically) Scientific Outlook on Development revised and restricted it, because free exploration may find the right way, but it is also easy to go to the black road, so free exploration needs certain conditions to correct and restrict it.

Within China, the trend of advocating the restoration of the M-shaped political and economic model has been arguing for many years, but it is still only a small tributary today. More and more people are dissatisfied with the dual-cat brand economy, but they are still not optimistic about the M-type economy. In today's China, the double-cat economy is still an economic model that can benefit most people and solve China's biggest shortcoming-economic problems. What kind of economic model can better solve people's livelihood and the country?

Third, the humiliation of reform and opening up.

Over the past 30 years of reform and opening-up, China's tolerance for western outrageous behavior has reached the point of slavery, but it is still forbearing. Why put up with it? Nothing more than not losing the western market and technology.

But, look carefully, what kind of goods are the western markets and technologies that China is very afraid of losing? In this western market, the price of everything made in China will go down, while the price made in China will go up. In order not to be driven out of such an indignant market, China's tolerance for the outrageous and unreasonable behavior of the West has reached the point of almost grovelling, and even the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China has been renamed by netizens.

The transfer of western science and technology in China is also a field full of irrationality and even insult. Many outdated technologies that were originally intended to be abandoned unconditionally by the West were sold to third world countries such as China because of China's reform and opening up, and the garbage was sold at a baby price. Therefore, western science and technology actually benefited from China's reform and development, which is a perfect sublation. The outdated technology that was originally prepared to give up unconditionally was sold at a baby price, and then the extra profits could be invested in industrial upgrading.

As for the first-class western technology that China wants most, I'm sorry, that's impossible. Have you noticed that American F22, which integrates the most advanced technology, is prohibited from being exported to foreign countries, including Britain, France and China, and nothing has happened?

So China can only get third-rate technology from the west.

First-class America keeps it for itself,

Second-rate Europe keeps it for itself.

China's current economic situation is so poor that it is regarded as a prosperous time by some people in China (according to my observation, most of them are people who can't surf the Internet and don't know what a horizontal comparison is). Damn, this cowardly thing is prosperous, so what is the world like in Europe and America-Aquino II and Louis XVI?

Therefore, in order to achieve economic development and scientific and technological progress, China has paid a huge humiliation price. More importantly, even if it is willing to bear such humiliation, it still cannot satisfy the western countries, especially the United States.

It is an inevitable choice for China, a country with a big country and a weak foundation, to make strategic economic planning (to avoid unnecessary low-end redundant construction) and give inclined support to scientific and technological progress (the higher the scientific and technological content, the more tax reduction support enterprises can get to help them deepen technological progress).

Fourth, economic development and scientific and technological progress are the top priorities of China's long-term development in the future.

It can be seen that economic development and scientific and technological progress are the top priorities of China's long-term development in the future.

Otherwise, it will be difficult to maintain stability within the country. How can a poor, backward and chaotic China stand out in the world and improve the cohesion of the Chinese nation? Is there any reason to accuse the elite of having the ability to immigrate immediately?

The more the economy develops and science and technology progress, the more favorable China will be in its foreign exchanges. The more the economy develops, the less you need to buy your own products at low prices to survive. The more advanced technology is, the less products it exports to itself.

As far as the military field is concerned, the future military will rely more and more on high technology, and the future military that burns high technology with money will need more and more tenacious support from the economy. Otherwise, even if high technology can be developed, it will not be equipped to the necessary scale.

In today's China, there are many forest directors who advocate catching up with the world level, gaining national strength through benefiting the people and strengthening the people, and carrying out scientific development. At the same time, many forest guides are still short-sighted and addicted to feudal forest guides, hoping to strengthen their own forest guides through ignorance and weakness.

Officialdom is actually an advanced civilian field. As can be seen from the officialdom ecology, there are actually two factions among the people, but their voices are weak, and no one cares about their own views.

China is still in the era of coexistence of old and new development views.

There are a large number of netizens in China who laugh at the Northern Dynasties. In fact, laughter 100 step is only 50 steps.

Fifth, actively use foreign aid to develop the economy.

By being the master of the country, this fish does not advocate shutting the country out, but is the master of the country, supplemented by foreign exchanges.

All countries in the world want to be strong, but they also want other countries to decline. If they dare not make their own decisions and entrust this sovereignty to any foreign country, they will only get a result. This country is in decline, whether absolute or relative.

If you develop your economy independently, supplemented by foreign countries, you can introduce and use foreign capital in a way that benefits and avoids disadvantages. On the contrary, if foreign countries are independent and open to the outside world, not only will the economy not develop greatly (who is wrong and willing to make you bigger? ), and it will endanger the survival and security of the country, and the most important economic fields will gradually be controlled by foreign capital.

6. Can a country develop its economy and technology independently without external support?

I should say yes. From the perspective of the whole earth, the earth people have not received the support of any other creatures, including Martians, and the economy and technology of the earth are still developing with each passing day.

Of course, due to the scattered distribution of resources (natural resources and human resources) around the world, a country's purely independent economic development is not economical enough, so it is the most reasonable economic development model to rely on foreign trade to complement each other while being independent.

Throughout the industrial history of developed countries in the world, we can also find that the more independent and in-depth the economy, the greater the development prospects.

Britain first realized the industrial revolution at home, and then it was able to carry out the world colonial movement, which in turn deepened the industrial revolution (Britain has been the most developed industrial country in the world since the industrial revolution, and there is no direct way to rely on other countries to help Britain develop its industry. Even if you British people are willing to be slaves of other countries for generations, it is a pity that the British can't be slaves).

The United States has no historical burden and a vast territory. At the stage of its domestic industrial revolution, which began 200 years ago, its industry had the nature of scale and standardization development, and then together they formed a strong industrial base in the United States. Then it was able to intervene in the two world wars and let the consequences of the two world wars develop in its own direction, deepening its own industrial revolution. Today, it has become the leader of the world information revolution. All this is not accidental. It has a deep foundation of industrial revolution, just as it is natural for countries and regions with the most developed feudal industries to produce developed handicrafts, which are the forerunner of capitalist production methods.

There is a similar process about the rise of Germany, France, Japan and Russia. In addition to the rise of Japan and the west's intention to cultivate factors to contain China and Russia, it is necessary to independently develop the domestic economy before expanding abroad.

Regarding China's foreign relations, it should be said that the honeymoon period between China and the West is getting closer and closer, not only on the surface, but also in essence. At the beginning, the West supported China to contain the Soviet Union. Now, the Soviet Union has collapsed, and its successor, Russia, is on a road that is getting worse and worse than China. It is also a reasonable choice for the west when it appears in the unified Russian system in the west.

Therefore, even if Sino-Western relations can be regarded as the most important foreign relations in the past, it is necessary to revise them in the future.

The more independent the economy, the greater the future of development.

Take China's military industry as an example. China's military industry is a heterogeneous industry in the whole tide of reform and opening up. Unable to buy the latest military products from the west, including some from Russia, China's military industry was forced to take the road of independent decision-making and external development. The achievements are obvious to all. China's military industry is the best industry for China to solve independently and develop externally, and it can also develop independently.

At the same time, some qualified military fans will also find that some still unsolved scientific and technological projects have become the biggest obstacle to China's military industry's independent decision-making and foreign development. For example, the problem that Xiaolong fighters rely on imported Russian engines has become the biggest obstacle to the export of Xiaolong fighters.

Seven. We will focus on the commodity economy model, supplemented by national policy support, and develop civil high-tech.

The commodity economy model is the main reason here, because the civilian high-tech is large in quantity and wide in scope, and it is often not urgently needed by the country, so it is not applicable to the way of national policy supporting military supplies, because even the country is unable to support its development, and the development of civilian high-tech can only be supplemented by policy support, mainly at the level of strategic planning and tax relief. But in the long run, tax reduction for civilian high-tech can get more tax revenue. Because the higher the level of science and technology, the greater the profits created. Therefore, the tax relief for civil high-tech tax is actually the proportion of tax revenue to income earners, not the total tax revenue. Private high-tech enterprises are not suitable to follow the taxation method of ordinary low-tech enterprises, because China's private high-tech enterprises are very weak now, and excessive taxation will make them lose the most needed R&D funds and increase the risks they need to face when their R&D fails.

At present, what needs to be adjusted most is the distribution of income, which is divided into the national level and the enterprise level.

At the national level, it is to formulate civil high-tech strategic planning and tax reduction and exemption strategies.

At the enterprise level, it is the owner who carries out the strategy of getting more profits for employees, including scientific and technological personnel.

At the same time, the state and enterprises implement the strategy that whoever contributes greatly to the development of civil high-tech should get more income, and those who benefit the most from the development of civil high-tech are naturally willing to invest more in the development of civil high-tech projects in order to obtain greater benefits, so civil high-tech can embark on a virtuous circle of development.

The biggest beneficiary of the development of civil high technology is the country, which is the owner and technical personnel of civil high technology. If they can work together in Qi Xin, then the remaining problem is to steadily catch up with the highest level in the world.

At the beginning of the reform and opening-up, China, which was poor and poor, obtained the huge amount of foreign capital that was most needed at that time. Without the entry of foreign capital, China's reform and opening up could not be discussed, and such a tax reduction and profit-making policy benefited a lot later. If you want something, you must invest in it.

Why can't the policy of giving foreign capital to Chinese capital?

For civilian high technology, if there is an opposite policy or attitude, whoever gains more will die first, then who is willing to take big risks and invest a lot of money for small profits?