What should I say after the interview?

What should I say after the interview?

The sentence that should be said after the interview, if the interview is not smooth, basically means failure, but if the interview is smooth, but we don't know the result, we can directly let the interviewer see the sentence that should be said after the interview.

What to say after the interview 1 When the interviewer finishes all the interview work within the specified time, he always politely asks you to go back and wait for the notice. Generally speaking, you always say thank you and leave quietly, but in fact you have been anxiously waiting for the answer on your way home.

However, if you say something else before saying "thank you" and turn passivity into initiative, your wait will at least not be long.

"Can you give me this job?"

It is said that this is because at the end of the interview, many people bravely asked a question and finally got the job. Perhaps it is such courage that touched the boss; Perhaps it is this persistence and desire that makes the boss embarrassed to refuse.

Maybe it's just luck, but anyway, after listening to the interviewer's job description, you can say with your mouth that the worst answer you will get is "no" or "we need time to interview and make a comprehensive evaluation."

"When can I get an answer at the latest?"

After the interview, facing your bravery, the interviewer may say "We need time to think about it" or "We will call you for a second interview".

In order to take the initiative, you can continue your question, because you want to know the worst. Maybe the interviewer will say, "No one answered." You may break your heart or run away,

But you must admit that at least the interviewer is serious and honest, and you can go all out to prepare for the next interview. "If for some reason you don't inform me of the deadline, can I contact you?"

Maybe the interviewer will be annoyed by this question, but most people will understand your feelings and he will attend a busy date with you. If this is the case, you will also help to contact his work.

Of course, if they are not interested in you, they will definitely give a hint: they are just perfunctory. "Can you recommend something that I might be interested in?"

If you know that you have been rejected, you can ask this question and you may get unexpected results. You know, most interviewers are very kind and willing to help you. Maybe he doesn't need you, but a friend of his needs you. Ask questions bravely,

Carefully record the possible agreement, sincerely thank the interviewer for giving you extra time, and finally leave. When you get home, put your thoughts in order. Today's job search is over, but there is one last thing. Write a thank-you note and send it out. This is the last part of the interview process.

What to say after the interview 2 interview skills: what not to say

First of all, I am the axis of rhetoric.

In the interview, the expression of your experience and ability is concise and enough is enough. Don't chatter, brag or even give priority to me like a chatterbox.

Job seekers should pay attention to reality and be concise. They shouldn't make too many verbal promises. If they talk too much, it is easy to arouse the examiner's disgust.

Examiners often ask you to show your talents on the spot during the interview. You can try modestly, but before you start, you can't wait to claim that it is ok. It's simple.

If you are suspected of bragging, you must be careful in job interviews. Yes, the examiner in charge of recruitment pays great attention to the evaluation of your ability, but he will be more cautious about you during the interview, in order to let you fully show yourself.

. At this time, if you want to confuse the examiner, ramble, talk about irrelevant topics, or even brag about your contacts and be complacent, for fear that others will not know how much energy you have, then the examiner will think that you are just a tiger skin, so shallow and so capable.

After all, boasting is to avoid the essence of the problem, so you cover up your shame with dishonest and frank flattery. For example, job seekers are often asked by examiners why they lost their past jobs. Some people deliberately talk about him in order to avoid the topic.

Talk about ideals and ambitions or what you have learned in your past work; If you really can't pass the customs, you will be greatly distressed by your previous work unit.

The implication is that the temple in the original work unit is too small to accommodate him as a big monk. Faced with such a boastful interviewer, the examiner will have a reaction in his heart: Who do you think you are? This temple doesn't need a pompous monk like you.

Second, you can't wait to grab words or argue.

Some job seekers will try to conquer each other through language offensive in order to win the favor of examiners. Such people have a strong desire for self-expression,

During the interview, no matter whether the examiner buys his account or not, he can't wait to distance himself and show off his eloquence without saying three or two words, so as to gain the upper hand on the phone and conquer the other side intellectually. Mainly manifested in grabbing words, * words, arguments and so on.

People who can't say that they love to talk or talk are shallow, but people often hate this phenomenon of ignoring their mouths. Therefore, in a job interview, no matter how unique your point of view is,

No matter how different other people's opinions are from yours, don't shut up before the other person has finished. This is also the minimum respect for the examiner.

Even if the examiner's words deviate too much, it means that the examiner is biased against you. At this time, no matter how much you say or how much you rob, it will only increase people's dislike for you.

* The next action of grabbing words is nothing more than arguing or arguing. But if the interview conversation turns into an argument or an argument, is such an interview still an interview? A job seeker has been arguing in the conversation: why not! Whatever you think, I have my opinion.

This kind of argument may show your intelligence, reasoning ability and persuasion ability, and may save face in a certain detail, but I don't know that the examiner has given up your employment from the overall situation for the sake of future peace.

Winning an argument and losing a good job can be said to be because of smallness. The goal of an interview is not to win a conversation or debate, but to get a job.

If you are so serious about the examiner in the conversation that the examiner is nervous about you and thinks that you are not looking for a job at all, but deliberately finding fault, you can imagine how bad the result will be!

Third, the key moment is dull.

Silence is golden? I'm sorry, you should not be misled by this overcorrection in the job interview. When the examiner asks some key questions, if you are as precious as gold, what are you trying to do? The examiner will think you are slow and dull.

If you leave such an impression on the examiner, you can say that your job search task has failed, because no company is willing to hire people who are slow to respond.

It is necessary to say less. But caution is more necessary than silence, not silence! Silence in the interview is of course dull and boring.

Although the contrast between the slow and the boaster is obvious, it is impossible to be a competent and good employee. The purpose of the job interview is to let the employer evaluate yourself. If you are embarrassed to speak, what will others say about you?

Interview dialogue should not only use your brain, but also use your heart. When you stand on tiptoe in front of the examiner and watch the other person swagger, you will inexplicably hang down your eyelids and feel ashamed. The questions and answers you designed for yourself before are gone.

The more you do this, the more you panic, which leads to your incoherence. This is all a sign of slow response.

Most people who are slow to respond are prone to inferiority complex. The more they feel inferior, the slower they are. This is called a vicious circle. Once people feel inferior and slow, they will not look directly at the examiner, and even become passive, indifferent and bored, thus destroying the examiner's enthusiasm and confidence in you. Therefore, you need to learn to make up for the mistakes in the interview.

Fourth, a shameless good teacher.

Looking for a job is looking for a job, and looking for a job is not equal to working. It is true that the incumbent should have the attitude of being the master, but when applying for a job, your position is not the master. Even if you think you are full of good ideas, it is not enough to impress the examiner.

Not everyone has new ideas, but people with good ideas and new ideas can't be good teachers everywhere, especially strangers.

The so-called new ideas more or less contain advice, and most of the advice is criticism. Criticism is unacceptable to someone, especially the criticism of strangers, and it is impossible to be appreciated, obeyed, and even less likely to have a good impression. This is the reason for making few suggestions.

You are a job seeker. If you say this idea in front of the examiner and make that suggestion, if you don't rule it out, then the examiner will be too opinionated.

In the examiner's view, it is a double-edged sword to let job seekers talk about ideas and make suggestions. On the one hand, it examines your thinking, at the same time, it also digs a trap for you, which will make you a good teacher and a talkative person immediately.

Therefore, in the interview, the most taboo is to give some suggestions with suggestions. No matter how pertinent and excellent your suggestion is, you'd better keep it until you are hired. Don't rush to show off when applying for a job.

Verbs (short for verb) ask some low-level questions.

A job interview is not an entrance interview. The examiner should examine your comprehensive quality, and at the same time, he can ask some questions related to your study, or ask some questions about the working system of the enterprise.

But before asking questions, you must think about whether the questions you want to ask have practical significance, especially don't ask some low-level or even naive questions.

For example, does the company have 24-hour hot water? Is there a bathroom in the office? Does the unit usually organize everyone to travel, etc. All these may ruin a good interview.

Sixth, arrogant.

This is the most common fault of those who are usually conceited and have no one to say. I have to admit that such people may have some capital superior to others, but this capital is likely to be lightened because of your arrogance.

The ancients said that it is the real accumulation of ability capital to accumulate thick and thin and hide. No matter how big your capital is, you are in a subordinate position when applying for a job.

Talking about how rich your experience is in front of the examiner just shows that you have no culture and don't care about others at all. Anyone dares to offend.

Most unruly job seekers have an inexplicable desire for control, bent on pressing others to show their advantages. I don't know if I'm going to interview with this mentality. The examiner is in charge of life and death. Let him listen respectfully to your suggestion. Isn't there a fire in his heart? You have offended the examiner, why do you want to interview?

Seven, the abuse of fashion language

It is not a bad thing for young people to pursue fashion, but fashion reflects a person's rebellious psychology towards reality from a certain angle. Some young people have average knowledge and ability, but they are fascinated by fashion and always like to use fashion words when speaking.

As a result, when I went to the job interview, I was as unscrupulous as blowing bubbles on the internet, and I talked to the examiner with very fashionable online fashion words.

I think this can not only make up for my lack of knowledge and ability, but also make the examiner feel that he is avant-garde and lovely, so I hired him. I don't know that most people who dare to be examiners are not fuel-efficient lamps. How can your frivolous language stop his sharp insight?

In addition, some people, who have learned half a barrel of foreign languages, like to add one or two English words to show off their English ability from time to time in the interview, but it is very dangerous to show off like this: if you meet the examiner and then clean up the mess with you in English, wouldn't you be shooting yourself in the foot?

Eight, regardless of the object.

Job hunting is not a complaint meeting, let alone a rescue meeting. Some job seekers didn't put themselves in the right position during the interview. When people ask questions, they are bitter when they answer them. They have experienced such misfortune and are overwhelmed by their families, thinking that this will arouse the sympathy of the examiner.

I don't know if this will not only get people's sympathy, but also make people's appetite open! Everyone has bad luck. Some people have poor psychological endurance, and when they encounter bad things, they sigh, clamoring for injustice in the world all day, and posing as a bitter enemy.

This may win sympathy from others, but it would be a fiasco if this skill is applied to job interviews with wishful thinking. Of course, the examiner also has compassion, but a competent examiner will never abuse this compassion. Those who encounter difficulties in the interview,

The examiner usually nods without saying a word, and seems to listen to you patiently. When your complaint is over, the examiner will tell you enthusiastically at best: please go back and wait for the notice. Wait, what month is it?