Job Recruitment Website - Job seeking and recruitment - Why are many people unwilling to be teachers now? Should teachers be market-oriented?

Why are many people unwilling to be teachers now? Should teachers be market-oriented?

Because the status of teachers has been the lowest since ancient times, from the ancient Confucius' way of education, strict teachers taught high people to those who dare not say or be strict with them, and also to those who dare not tell them. The status of teachers has gone down from the altar, and the status of parents has been rising. No matter what they ask, they all say that the teacher will delay leaving school. They say that teachers can't publish the results unless they publish the exams. No matter what, as long as they sue the teacher, they will win, which leads to the trend that parents sue the teacher now. Even if the child has an accident outside the school, he is the first to think of suing the teacher and the school. Now no one cares that students scold teachers and beat them. If the teacher scolds the students and hits them, it will be a big deal, and all kinds of immortals will come out and spray you to death. So there are more and more Buddhist teachers, but now there are no civil servants to test teachers. It is impossible to market teachers now, but I think it is really necessary to improve the treatment and status of teachers. The country will prosper, respect teachers, and attach importance to teachers.

Those who don't want to be teachers are rare here. Teachers have high salaries and good welfare benefits. Who doesn't want to be a teacher? Unfortunately, not everyone can be a teacher if they want to. I don't know if I don't want to be a teacher in the countryside. As a teacher, we must not be market-oriented. Teachers teach and educate people. Once marketized, the teaching direction will be deviated.

Many people don't want to be teachers. We need to know the reasons behind it.

Teacher, there have been bad comments since ancient times.

He who has three buckets of grain is not the king of children. "What smelly Laojiu". The teacher doesn't seem to have smelled the fragrance.

Therefore, there is no respect or disrespect for teachers in society. Especially now, it seems that most people understand education. No matter who they are, they can tell us what education and teachers should do. The noble occupation of "teacher" has become a dangerous and unpopular occupation.

In order to save themselves and keep their jobs, teachers are trying to protect themselves.

It can be said that anyone can't live without a teacher, and anyone's success depends on the efforts of a successful teacher besides the selfless support of their parents. It is closely related to the education of teachers.

In school, teachers have a lifelong influence on students. Some children get good grades, which is inseparable from the hard work of teachers. A little progress of students is inseparable from the teacher's actions and eyes. The teacher determines the children's learning attitude.

Family education is very important. Teachers are adults who have the greatest influence on students outside the family.

At school, some teachers give lectures at an average level, but students especially admire his character and the level of dealing with people. Learning this course well has a far-reaching impact on students.

At school, some children get bad grades, while others get good grades. There are many reasons why children's academic performance is good or bad, and teachers can't decide. But teachers can influence children through their own charm.

A teacher's little gesture and a look can produce such a beautiful effect.

Sometimes the teacher doesn't know the story, but the seeds of hope are quietly sown in the hearts of children.

As parents and teachers, we must influence or illuminate our children like a beam of light.

At present, teachers have no position in society and there are too many factors. Social concern, parents' respect and students' respect are all important.

But one thing is that the teacher didn't do well, which hurt the hearts of parents and children. That is, individual teachers focus on money and run classes to make money.

The demand of people is endless, and the class is getting bigger and bigger for money, which increases the learning burden of students; Increased the financial pressure on parents. It has aroused strong opposition from society, families and students. Caused a very bad influence.

Parents should ask: What about teachers' morality?

Education without teachers' morality is unconvincing.

See how important the teacher is from this sentence.

Loving students is a teacher's bounden duty. Combine home and school to educate students well. Parents can't put everything on schools and teachers. Teachers have teaching tasks every day, and there are many things that teachers can't give to children. Because time is limited, parents can never finish their children's education. Cultivating children's good habits is the lifelong responsibility of parents.

Parents should not stare at the teacher's shortcomings, and don't get emotional over a trifle. It's no use. In the end, the teacher still has to deal with it.

Communicate with the teacher with gratitude to solve some things. Parents respect their teachers by respecting your children.

Conclusion:

At present, there are still many graduates who take the examination of teachers, and they are all highly educated. It can be seen that the profession of "teacher" is still very popular.

The whole society has established an atmosphere of respecting teachers and attaching importance to teaching, so that teachers can play their role. The scientific and technological development of the motherland depends on teachers, whose mission is still very arduous.

Glad to receive the invitation!

I was surprised when I first saw why many people don't want to be teachers! I think the topic is either national princelings or rich and powerful girls. It may also be that some children who care about the people have to find another job and hold a normal diploma.

The first possibility is a rich and powerful son, who is greedy for money and naturally unwilling to work hard again.

The second possibility is to see that many people are disgusted with some improper behaviors of teachers now and are unwilling to associate with them.

In a word, the profession of teachers is an industry that people admire and respect, and it is oriented to human development and national prosperity. However, in recent years, some people regard this profession as a profiteering industry, causing public complaints. The state has taken corresponding measures against this strange phenomenon, and I believe that in the near future, the profession of teachers will return to the ranks of people's admiration!

. Teachers, originally a noble profession, why do many people don't want to be teachers now? (1) Now she is a teacher with low income, no economic foundation and low social status. Especially since the reform and opening up, the income of an ordinary migrant worker is higher than that of a teacher, so that teachers are ashamed to tell their profession in front of others for fear of being looked down upon by others. (2) Teachers are not respected and protected. At present, things that discredit and vilify teachers are overwhelming. The policies promulgated by the state protect children's rights and interests, but not teachers. What happens to students at school, the education authorities should deal with teachers first, so that parents can be comforted. Because teachers can manage, parents can't. Euphemistically called "maintaining stability", I am afraid that my parents will make trouble. If the management of teachers is strict, there will be dangers, such as collecting students' mobile phones and killing teachers; Some students hit nine bricks in the head from behind the teacher and died on the spot; Twenty years later, the teacher was slapped in the street, which made the teacher lose face.

; There are students who openly do intimate actions in class, and there are also students who are reprimanded by the teacher for their claws, and so on.

If you don't get a lot of money, you will be hurt a lot, just like a cockroach climbing a chimney. Who can love you if you take the black road and suffer indignities?

However, marketing teachers are not desirable. I think the profession of teachers has its particularity, education is public welfare, and marketization is not acceptable. The state should expand the number of free normal students. Teachers are directly supplied by teachers' colleges and recruited by miscellaneous army. Such a teacher is a qualified teacher.

To change the current situation of being unwilling to be a teacher, the state should improve the economic treatment and social status of teachers, and let the society form an atmosphere of respecting teachers and attaching importance to teaching. This is the fundamental solution.

It's not that I don't want to, but that social ideology has changed, and teachers are no longer a respected profession for everyone, nor is it a profession for the rich. What is the standard to measure people's social status and respect now? It is money and power. So some people don't want to be teachers, but they dare not be teachers. Teachers are the main force of education. Education is the hope of the country and the future of the nation. It is extremely important for teachers to stay and teach with peace of mind.

Rejuvenate the country through science and education. Education makes talents. The education of the country and the dual tasks and responsibilities entrusted by the people determine the status of education and teachers.

Whether there was a "private school" in the past or the state has always set it up, it is not for making money.

If there is an objective saying that "some people don't want to be teachers", it is determined by the social and economic status of teachers.

This piece of discussion has been hot recently, and the answer to this question and answer question has also been talked about a lot. Here, I don't want to fry leftovers any more.

I just want to focus on the second question, "Should teachers be marketized?" ? And the relationship with "unwilling to be a teacher".

What do you think of "the greatest role of marketization"? My personal public opinion is to make money.

If this statement is true, the following main situations will occur after the marketization of education and teachers:

1, the purpose of running a school is to make money, losing the original intention and direction of running a school, leading to a vicious circle and competition, forming a bargaining chip and tool for the host to be the boss, the teacher to be the wage earner and the students to make money;

2. The teacher is full of a sense of crisis, or he meets the narrow road as required by the boss and tries his best to go to extremes; Or go all out to make money. Teachers' narrow educational ideas and "copper-smelling" behavior towards students will inevitably be resented and lashed by society and parents, and teachers' status will become predictable;

3. Parents are more anxious about their children's study and future, and make vicious investments, which is painful;

4. Students are more bound, demanding to run schools according to the will of the market, and the pressure is even greater, and they can't get the all-round development and growth of "moral, intellectual, physical and artistic work" at all;

5. It is very likely that the national education policy will not be implemented smoothly by decree.

If so, "many people don't want to be teachers" will definitely come true from the shadow.

Education is a pure land. There is some truth in the old saying "read only the books of sages with one heart". Marketization, education and teachers should not be involved.

First of all, what I heard and witnessed is exactly the opposite of the subject's point of view. It's not that many people don't want to be teachers now, but they are vying to be teachers. In recent years, the number of applicants for the teacher qualification examination has been increasing, and the number of applicants for the teacher preparation examination is second only to the civil service examination, which is the best proof.

Secondly, education is to cultivate talents for economic and social development, which is related to the rise and fall of the country. Teachers bear the important responsibility of teaching and educating people. Therefore, the state vigorously develops education, strengthens the construction and training of teachers, and the laws and regulations on teacher education strictly stipulate the qualifications of teachers, which improves the entry threshold for teachers. That is, only those who meet the statutory requirements and pass the exam can become teachers, not those who want to be teachers.

Finally, on the question of whether teachers should be market-oriented, the author thinks that they can be market-oriented, but they must be legalized and the number of qualified teachers is several times that of local teachers or can fully meet the demand, and they cannot be market-oriented rashly, because teachers are a special profession for cultivating talents.

Misleading, misunderstanding, no right to speak without investigation and study, now workers, farmers and individual industrial and commercial households are an important part of society. I may hurt some teachers by saying this, but it's true. Under such great employment pressure, many farmers are migrant workers, and some workers working in private enterprises cannot get due protection. The market competition of individual industrial and commercial households is fierce, and the treatment of teachers is basically the same as that of civil servants. Some teachers may think that they are not as good as civil servants, or they may not allow extracurricular cram schools for cultural classes now, and a few people complain. As for the marketization of teachers, I don't think you want to be a teacher. You don't have to apply for the teacher major or take the teacher qualification examination. Teachers teach and educate people, and education is a public welfare undertaking. Teachers who are unfaithful to education can invite teachers, and teachers are just an alternative among teachers. They should be disqualified as teachers.

Marketization of teachers? I really don't understand the relationship between "many people don't want to be teachers" and marketization. Does the topic mean that "many people don't want to be teachers" is because the salary is low, so that the salary of teachers can be solved by market fluctuations. When many people are willing to be teachers and the competition is fierce, the treatment will be reduced; When many people don't want to be teachers and it is difficult for teachers to recruit, they will raise the price of teachers and give them higher wages. If so, if the operating rules of market economy are applied to the non-economic education field, then is this education still like education, and can it be peaceful?

People's Teahouse thinks it is impossible for teachers to be market-oriented. The recruitment of teachers must go through strict procedures and the entry level must be well controlled. The treatment of teachers must also be stable, and education can't stand the ups and downs like the market.

As for why many people don't want to be teachers at present, it is because students and parents are so well protected that some students and parents always disrespect teachers with a condescending attitude. Nowadays, students are untouchable and can't afford to offend. Parents abuse the right of appeal, making teachers as small as women in the old society, with too many constraints and too many personnel and institutions in charge of teachers. Not only that, but teachers also bear too many responsibilities, and many responsibilities that should be borne by the family and society are also on teachers' heads. In addition, professional titles seriously interfere with the educational order, the construction of teachers' morality and the distribution of teachers' salaries, resulting in teachers' physical and mental fatigue and job burnout. How can such an educational environment not scare off people who want to come in? Even a few people who have come in will have the idea of fleeing.

To sum up, in order to make outstanding talents willing to enter the field of education, we must vigorously reform education and create a good educational environment, instead of pushing teachers to the market.

What did everyone say? Welcome to leave a message for discussion. This is the people's teahouse. Thank you for reading. Let's care about education, teachers and make suggestions for education. In fact, when many people don't want to be teachers, we should also see that many people want to be teachers. After all, teachers' work is relatively stable, their salaries are guaranteed, and they are increasing year by year. I believe there will be more people willing to be teachers in the future. If you want to know more about people, please come to People's Teahouse often.