Is Yanshan Petrochemical easy to enter?

Tianjin Petrochemical Company is in the west of Lingchao Lake in Dagang, where the monthly work 1000 is over, which is really too high compared with the chimneys there. Some workers can still eat meat after work, so their income should be reduced. At least it should not exceed 1 0,000, and the income of cadres will increase even if it is low. 1 000 is too little, and the monthly income of small leaders should be increased to at least 500,000. After work, they are busier than workers, and the monthly communication expenses are hundreds of thousands. Compared with their expenses, their monthly income of over 1 000 is simply nine Niu Yi cents. To learn from Scientific Outlook on Development, we should look at leaders with dynamic Scientific Outlook on Development. High-income leaders are leaders, and it is their bounden duty to obey them. Don't have money worship, arm your mind with correct outlook on life and values, learn more and sum up more, do your job well in this post, know that the working class is the owner of the enterprise, and that reform is an important means for the continuous progress of the enterprise, treat the enterprise distribution reform with dynamic thinking and scientific development vision, carry forward the fine traditions of the Chinese nation, and be diligent and frugal. 46667.68686666666

The crux lies in the fact that a huge black hole has actually formed in society to absorb wealth. This black hole absorbs a considerable part of the fruits of social development, and the rest of people can get very limited parts. In this limited part, to improve this part, it must be destroyed by another part, which is limited space. This huge black hole relies on the gray income formed by power. The income of leaders above division level in China Petrochemical Tianjin Petrochemical Company is too low, only 18000 yuan per month. In addition, the color income is only a few hundred thousand per month, and the wages of workers are on the high side, 1000 yuan per month. Some employees can buy meat after work, which runs counter to the policy and guiding ideology of our country. Compared with the development and construction of large international enterprises, the income of the leaders of Tianjin Petrochemical Company is very low from top to bottom, so can they remain clean with high salaries?

10 10/3 1 day, at the China Twelfth Five-Year Reform International Forum hosted by China (Hainan) Reform and Development Research Institute, Guma said that there has always been a huge "black hole" for absorbing wealth in China society, and this "black hole" has absorbed a considerable part of development achievements, so the rest can be distributed very limited. How big is this "black hole"? According to his estimation, in 2009, the fiscal revenue obtained by the government through various means was about110.5 trillion yuan, accounting for one third of GDP.

The following is the full text of Guma's speech:

Good Morning, everyone! Today, I mainly talk about social construction and the "Twelfth Five-Year Plan" reform. Why are we talking about this issue? I want to talk about social construction. First of all, this is not a matter of concept. This is a very realistic problem. Many problems in China are like this. At first, it seems to be a problem of ideas, but after a period of time, it has become a problem closely related to people's lives, and even a problem of people's rice bowls. For example, the problem of environmental protection is like this. In the 1980s, this may be just the idea of some intellectuals, which is very advanced and even a little extravagant, but now we can see that this is a real problem. The same is true of democracy and social construction. It may have been an idea many years ago, but now it has become a matter closely related to people's rice bowls, and so has social construction. One of the most important contents of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan is a very important theme of our meeting, which is the reform of income distribution and the adjustment of interest relations. In the process of formulating the "Twelfth Five-Year Plan", people often mention the national income multiplication plan, and also propose that national income and economic growth should grow simultaneously. Now some local governments have clearly proposed to implement the national income multiplication plan in the "Twelfth Five-Year Plan".

However, I don't know if you have noticed. The online reaction to this can be said to be indifferent, and even a few reactions on some forums are cynical. Why? This is a question worthy of our consideration. There is a reason for this cold or even indifferent reaction. It may be that people are worried about the implementation of the policy based on their experience in these years. The final result of a good policy is hard to say. Therefore, policies are very important and mechanisms are more important. If there is no good mechanism to ensure the implementation of the policy, it may eventually go to the opposite side. At the policy level, newspapers and various public opinions talk more about doubling income, but in fact, there is another kind of worry. Will the income multiplication plan become the reality of expenditure multiplication? The sign of income doubling is not obvious, but the sign of expenditure doubling is much more obvious than the trend of income doubling. There are at least two things that deserve our attention recently. One is rising prices, especially those commodities closely related to people's lives, such as grain and oil, vegetables, meat, various foods, water, electricity and gas. During this period, people's expenditure in this area is far from being measured by CPI growth of 3% and 4%. Second, the tax burden will increase significantly in the future. Property tax, vehicle and vessel use tax, environmental tax and social security tax are all in the pipeline, and a series of taxes and fees will increase significantly.

Two days ago, the National People's Congress discussed the issue of travel tax, and there were many different opinions among the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC). A person wrote an article saying that the tax burden is so heavy that people have to pay, which becomes what regulation. In the end, the money will be collected. When the economy grows fast, the money will be collected. Collect money when the house price is high. The regulation of economy and society will eventually become money. This article points out that the tax burden of China people is very high. For example, the tax burden of car owners is very high. A car bears a lot of taxes, such as value-added tax, annual inspection fee, license fee and congestion fee. Various taxes and fees account for 40% of the total cost of a car. In this case, some experts or deputies to the National People's Congress suggested that in order to encourage people to use cars less, all units should not be allowed to provide free parking spaces for their employees. In the end, everything turned into money. In this case, there is a very realistic question-whether a well-intentioned policy that works hard in the direction of doubling national income will eventually become the result of doubling the expenditure of ordinary people. From the government's point of view, we can also see a reality, that is, limited commitment in a narrow space. This government emphasizes people's livelihood, especially raising the income of the bottom people. Judging from the field investigation in some places, the situation of farmers has improved obviously in recent years. Policies such as agricultural tax exemption, compulsory education and new rural cooperative medical care have played a very good role in improving farmers' lives, especially in some relatively poor places. These signs of improvement are more obvious, but we must understand that such efforts are actually at the expense of other aspects of society. To put it more directly, the improvement of the bottom in recent years is closely related to the deprivation of the middle class. Two recent surveys are quite shocking. One was conducted by Sina. More than 7000 people participated in the survey. The survey results show that the vague intention of emigration reaches 88.2%, which is close to 90%. The second one was conducted by HSBC, which surveyed people whose monthly salary exceeded12,000 yuan and their current assets exceeded 500,000 yuan. Among these people, 60,000 people have immigration plans within 10. The results of this survey are quite shocking. Some people call it the collective escape of the elite, some people call it the third wave of immigration, and some people call it voting with their feet. In fact, we are facing a very small space. In this small space, as long as we make up this place, we have to dig another place, or rob Peter to pay Paul. In recent years, governments at all levels have made some very sincere efforts, but these efforts are limited commitments made in a very narrow space.

From the people's point of view, or from the government's point of view, we are faced with a very serious reality. Why is this happening? The crux lies in the fact that a huge black hole has actually formed in society to absorb wealth. This black hole absorbs a considerable part of the fruits of social development, and the rest of people can get very limited parts. In this limited part, to improve this part, it must be destroyed by another part, which is limited space. This huge black hole relies on the gray income formed by power. There are two figures, one is the government's fiscal revenue. According to the data of Zhou Tianyong, my calculation results are as follows: in 2009, the government's income in various forms was110.5 trillion, accounting for one third of the 33 trillion GDP of that year; The second number was calculated by Wang Xiaolu. In 2008, the GDP income was unclear and lost. I don't know who is responsible, and it is also one-third of GDP. Where did the money go? Considering the current housing prices in China, this figure is not much different. If these two figures are established to a certain extent, there will be a shocking result. One third of the wealth created by citizens in a year is government revenue and one third is lost. The remaining one-third belongs to standardized distribution, and the profits of enterprises are also in this one-third. All these happened under the background of building a harmonious society. What is the relationship between our goals and slogans and reality? What are the problems? This is a question that we need to think about. All possible good slogans have been put forward, but what is the problem?

What is reflected behind this is a mechanism problem. Society may have a problem with the mechanism. Looking at income distribution now, we can't understand it with the original concept of income distribution with wages as the main form. We should consider how to solve the problems of resource distribution and wealth distribution in China and how to form a new mechanism of wealth and resource distribution. The solution of this problem depends on a relatively independent society. Without relatively independent forces, it is impossible to solve the problem of unbalanced interests. This is a very realistic problem. There is a more fundamental question in this question, which is to rebuild power or society? In recent years, there is a very obvious trend, that is, power is constantly strengthening, and society begins to return to the trend of relying on power to solve problems and conquer the world with power.

Why is this trend? Sometimes our understanding is too simple. In fact, there is a deeper background, which is the complexity of economic and social life, including market economy, globalization, scientific and technological development, rapid urbanization and so on. This is a realistic challenge, which objectively requires stronger governance ability. However, in the absence of market and society, the demand for stronger governance ability can easily be directly transformed into a call for power. In this case, it will be difficult to meet this challenge if the multi-governance structure of market, society and government cannot be formed as soon as possible. thank you