Job Recruitment Website - Job seeking and recruitment - Is it fair to be sent on duty for flood control just because you are a temporary worker, not a regular worker?
Is it fair to be sent on duty for flood control just because you are a temporary worker, not a regular worker?
There must be a brave man under the reward. If the work is done by A, but the person who is rewarded is B, how to transfer in this case? Therefore, the conditions for the establishment of the brave under the four rewards are that everyone knows what the four rewards are, how to identify the record, and how to prevent their achievements from being arrogant by others. These are all knowledge of management. Temporary workers are also temporary workers.
Formal workers are earned by others, and most temporary workers don't have to take the exam. People have been studying hard for many years, and it is normal to get a high salary after the exam. Don't be mentally unbalanced. I used to be a temporary worker in a company with a low salary. I resigned a long time ago and went it alone. Now I earn much more than the regular workers in my previous unit.
Some people just talk about the truth and don't put themselves in their shoes. They haven't experienced it personally and don't know how others feel. In fact, they may not be able to do it. Material civilization and spiritual civilization coexist, and there can be no spiritual civilization. If you dismiss, you can dismiss. Sometimes, some people are wrong and some people are right. This is the real society. I think it's quite right. The work of the unit can be divided into formal work and labor dispatch, but the duty on the dam is another form, and it is impossible to distinguish the identity of the personnel in the duty subsidy and materials. Since you think so clearly with me, I will think clearly with you.
You can get different rewards. After all, everyone else has passed the exam. It's obviously impossible for you to ask for the same treatment as a regular worker, but you have to work together in Qi Xin to benefit from this flood control. If you go to a formal job, it is understandable for a temporary worker to go, and there is nothing to complain about not being fired. But if there are many temporary workers, or they have nothing to do with regular workers, it is definitely wrong to let them go if there are dangerous things! Moreover, it is a fact that the temporary workers in our unit basically do most of the business work. If it is a regular worker, the unit can't say dismissal. After all, everything behind it is not simple.
In my opinion, the work of part-time workers at that time should not include flood control. Since flood control is not the working space stipulated in the contract, you have the right to refuse. If you want to fire me by rejecting me, it's illegal. It is clearly written in the labor contract law. The tasks of temporary workers should be strictly separated from those of regular workers. If a temporary worker is allowed to fly a plane, will he? If temporary workers are allowed to organize government meetings, will government officials listen to him? Do you have the right to send temporary workers to environmental law enforcement? If a temporary worker is asked to give a report on government work, will he? You put a temporary worker in charge of conscription, who listens to him? Will you ask a temporary worker to get the town plan? There are three levels of government and three levels of tasks. It is necessary to strictly distinguish the tasks, contents and nature of temporary workers and regular workers, and clarify the tasks and contents, rather than treating them differently when paying wages. This is unfair, and it is naked labor exploitation of temporary workers.
He has never suffered others, nor has he advised others to be kind. Maybe this temporary worker is the pillar of the family. If something happens on the embankment, the sky will fall! It is said that the state's pensions for regular and temporary workers and the late subsidies for family members are also different. Usually temporary workers are odd jobs, and the number of dangerous goods at critical moments must be compiled by regular workers! Personally, I think there is nothing wrong with temporary workers refusing to go to the embankment! It is a common phenomenon that an unimportant person is assigned to an important position, and most unimportant positions are occupied by important people. Important positions are prone to problems, unimportant people are responsible for problems, and unimportant positions are not prone to problems.
Temporary workers and interns are of the same nature. You do the most and are the most tired. It's not necessarily you who can stay in the end. Some temporary workers just do it in order to stay, whether right or not, which also leads to many temporary workers doing things too rudely, and they can only take the blame for problems. Your unit is a public welfare organization. Whether you stamp, invoice or serve tea, you are a public service organization. Simply put, it is a unit that serves the people and the society. Refuse to engage in flood control, just don't want to serve. For whatever reason, you don't have the prerequisite ideological quality to serve the people, so you are not suitable for this. As for the different positions and different salaries you said, those are the business of the unit itself and the decision-making level. If you ask me, it's a good thing that you didn't become a full member with this mentality. If you become a full member, you are probably more than just an uncle.
They are used to it. With a small foreign population, a 60-year-old aunt can earn money as a bartender to support herself. China has a large population. There are many people you don't want to do this temporary job. It is also very hard for leaders to dismiss people. Isn't it easy to hire people? A slightly better job, whatever. See how many companies recruit people over 45. The food served in the restaurant is young and beautiful. What is unconventional? When the population drops sharply, the situation will probably get better. Otherwise. Only one survival can make you give up the right of so-called temporary workers.
I think temporary workers are right. Labor dispatch has specific work contents. Just like the cleaning of the unit, the job of others is cleaning. You have to write programming for aunt cleaning to see if people want to. Secondly, wages and benefits naturally have to keep up. It's nothing. Why do people write codes for you with cleaning money? Ideological work with some leaders?
- Related articles
- Is there any way to judge whether a new business model is valuable?
- Registration conditions of health management consulting company
- I just finished the written test of Huizhou Rural Commercial Bank on 20 15 last week. Who knows when the written test results of Huizhou Rural Commercial Bank will come out?
- What is the treatment of supernumerary teachers in kindergartens in Jiangbei District of Ningbo?
- Which insurance company is PPLC?
- How about zhang wan Central Primary School in Xiangzhou District?
- Which electronics factories in Hangzhou are recruiting people, and where to recruit them?
- Shanghai Luo Heng Bearing Co., Ltd. Recruitment information, how about Shanghai Luo Heng Bearing Co., Ltd.
- What are the construction characteristics of rotary bored pile?
- Does Changchun nursing home use nursing workers?