? Interview tip: First impression is very important.

First impressions are very important. An interview is an interview, that is, an inter+view, that is, a look at each other. Therefore, the interactive standard in the interview process is sometimes "look". Of course, the first sight is "the first impression is king".

Xiaofeng, who is about to graduate from graduate school, applies for a job as a teacher in the school. As a result, she was frustrated in her job search a while ago and dyed her hair red in a rage. As a result, the principal looked at her for a few minutes and ended the interview. Naturally, the result is obvious.

How to position the interview? Interview is the direct goal of doing resume. Being able to interview shows that your resume has been approved-that is, you can't "pick out" the reasons that can eliminate you in your resume. So next, look for "reasons to get rid of you" through the interview.

Note that this is exactly the concept of standard human resource recruitment: finding (asking) inferior people to eliminate them. So the interview process is actually a game process between you and the interviewer to avoid being "eliminated". So the first task of the interview process is to avoid the veto point. A large number of interview studies show that many successful candidates are not excellent, but because the interviewer has not found a reason to eliminate him. With this concept of psychological game, it is obvious that the interviewer's purpose is to let you see his shortcomings.

Knowing this, maybe the interview process will not be so easily fooled.

At the same time, from a constructive point of view, it is necessary to strengthen the first impression without making it a veto point. As for the first impression, we all know that it takes less than ten seconds to form, but it may take a lifetime to change it. So as an interviewer, we must first cultivate this level. So, what aspects should we cultivate?

Dress is the first thing to look at, so it should be appropriate. Appropriate means more in line with the culture of the enterprise and the expectations of the interviewer. Here, try not to unnecessarily show your "personality". You are ready to enter the workplace and accept the rules and changes here.

One of the disapproving points in the dress may be that a boy wears a dark suit, but sticks out his legs with a pair of white socks-this is the same as eating melon seeds. As long as he chews it, everything in his mouth will come out. Girls' clothes need a sense of professionalism, not charm. I have seen the interviewer interview a little girl again and again, and the last pass was brushed off because she was more attractive. Etiquette, as long as you don't give people distrust. For example, there is a behavior called "protecting wolves", which means looking back from time to time. If so, the interviewer will be unbearable.

Insert a special case here, that is, not looking good, which will really make the first impression more difficult. In this case, you may need to come up with a lot of your own "measurable achievements" and try your best to go beyond the application process of the human resources department and directly enter the boss's special interview process. Because the boss is considering "winning" when selecting people. Some time ago, I met a graduate who was burned in the face when he was a child. Although I made great achievements, I was frustrated in my job search and finally got a good job in a special way.

After the first impression, it is a contest with the interviewer.

The communication between people is a process of mutual influence, but different people have the same influence tendency. For example, the interviewer is a powerful person, so he may like to be in the dominant position. In the face of such an interviewer, if you also want to try to seize the dominant position in communication, the result can be imagined. Everyone knows how to deal with this situation. But what if you meet an interviewer with weak "control"? At this time, if you don't know whether it's good or bad, you should push your luck to dominate the interview process and finally embarrass the interviewer completely. Then the interviewer will use the killer lanthanum-eliminate you. Therefore, in the process of interview interaction, we should always hand over the initiative of interview progress to the interviewer. For example, if you have almost answered the question, you should ask, "You must be more authoritative in this respect. I hope to have the opportunity to enter the company and learn more from you ... "If the other party is silent, you can say," I don't know if my answer needs to be enriched ... "The point here is that the dominant position lies with the other party.

In addition, if you meet a "perverted" interviewer who takes "embarrassment" as a pleasure and embarrasses the other person, you can provide some anchor points to the other person from time to time. For example, if the other person is trying to crush you, you can say, "I heard from the classmate interviewed earlier that you are a very strict person, but I feel that you are very responsible for your students." The essence of this sentence is to give the other party an anchor point of "caring for students". But it must be remembered that the establishment of anchor points must have a foundation, otherwise it will anger the other side and strengthen the attack enthusiasm of the other side. When building an anchor point for each other, you should have the true nature of a student-just silly, cute and pathetic. These three are actually the highest realm of emotional intelligence. In this regard, it is necessary to have a good simulation exercise after class.

Finally, psychologically, as an interviewer, you should always go back to the basic point-that is, what is the purpose of your coming here? If it is "I really want this job" or "I know something about this position before, and I think it suits me very well", then you should be careful not to fall into the "target" of fighting with the interviewer.

I want to remind you that if the interviewer starts asking questions that have nothing to do with work, maybe you should be aware of your situation. In this case, on the one hand, you can't start "fighting", on the other hand, you can't jump into the trap directly. Psychological research shows that people who refuse are in more formal situations and use more formal words. If the interviewer starts asking some informal questions, it may be a good sign. But at the same time, we should avoid possible traps and know our own boundaries. For example, asking "Do you have a girlfriend" may not be a big problem. But if you ask "is your girlfriend beautiful" again, it may be a bit off topic. You can say, "It's hard to say. We'll invite you to dinner after work. " We don't hurt each other or take each other seriously. In short, going back to the basic point is to know where your boundaries are.

Through the above "organized first impression-interviewer anchoring-grasping the basic points", you can basically make yourself less likely to become a fighting beast activated by unqualified interviewers, or a loser who is suppressed by interviewers and loses confidence. The final thought is "you are not an apple", and you are an active selector. You know, "choose their company" and "reject them" are both options you can exercise.