What happened to those in Henan who missed the written test and were shortlisted for the teacher recruitment interview?

What's going on here? The investigation team said that the statistics were wrong, but it was actually a written test.

In fact, the open recruitment examination for teachers in Xiangfu District of Kaifeng City was originally held last year, but it was not held until this year for various reasons. According to the information, the candidates who reflected this matter took the written test on July 6, announced the results on June 22, announced the interview list on July 22, and conducted an interview on July 36.

However, on July 26th, candidates found that those who missed the written test were shortlisted for the interview. According to the published list, three candidates, Jiang Moumou, Peng Moumou and Nie Moumou, were absent from the written test but appeared on the interview list.

I can understand that you don't have to attend the interview, because in some cases, you can directly avoid the test, but you don't need a written test, which is really out of line. Moreover, the recruitment brochure released in July last year stipulated in black and white that you can't interview if you are absent from the written test.

No wonder students want to be exposed. According to the information on the exposure list, Jiang, Peng and Nie participated in the recruitment of teachers in Kaifeng, Henan Province with 7,000 other people. The written test report showed that all three were absent from the exam.

Is it because of negligence at work? However, teacher recruitment is related to national education and is a national event. Generally speaking, there is nothing wrong. The list must have been reviewed by many people. Could it be the same name? It is even more impossible, because there is an admission ticket number. I think many students will think of a problem, and talents may have to be changed to these three places.

Fortunately, the investigation was finally clear. On July 27th, the joint investigation team seized the surveillance video, read the inspection materials, asked the relevant staff and made a detailed written report.

Source: Website of Xiangfu District People's Government, Kaifeng City, Henan Province

According to the report, the third-party examination company is responsible for the examination of recruiting teachers, and the district recruitment examination leading group will publicize it. For everyone's objection, the final conclusion is that the scores of individual candidates are wrong. Jiang Moumou, Peng Moumou and Nie Moumou, who showed "lack of exams", all took the written test, and their test scores were 35.5 points, 62 points and 55 points respectively.

Some people will say that such a low score can get into the interview? Candidates with low scores enter the interview, and the investigation team also explained that some positions have reached the standard, but there are many people who are absent from the exam, so some positions can enter the interview even with low scores. Just like the "special education professional post" that Jiang Moumou applied for, he recruited 5 people, took the test 18, and finally 7 people took the test. The highest score is 7 1, and the lowest score is Jiang Moumou 35.5.

However, I always feel very strange. Won't the invigilator confirm the number of people? Don't candidates sign? Don't you check the absentees? According to what? You don't have to check the absence list at the test center?

What can I say now that the notice has come down? Everything is official, and it is also an account. The act of not allowing absentees to participate in the interview violated the fair examination.