Job Recruitment Website - Job seeking and recruitment - Should the recruitment age limit of 35 be abolished for delaying retirement?

Should the recruitment age limit of 35 be abolished for delaying retirement?

It should be cancelled.

Nowadays, whether it is civil servant recruitment or enterprise recruitment, 35 years old is a hurdle. By the age of 40, there are almost no units. Before the implementation of the gradual delayed retirement scheme, can the recruitment age limit of 35 be abolished to solve the employment problem of not finding a job after 35?

Not only the civil service examination, but also the recruitment of enterprises, whether state-owned or private, except for special positions, most of the recruitment is limited to under 35 years old.

According to industry analysis, before gradually delaying retirement, it is necessary to eliminate the institutional obstacles about the 35-year-old age requirement in real recruitment. From the perspective of employment discrimination, not only civil servants, but also general positions in society cannot distinguish candidates by age and gender. From the perspective of fairness, it is unreasonable to limit the age of application.

Extended data

In the current fierce employment competition environment, not only the recruitment age of civil servants is required to be under 35, but many enterprises also set the threshold for recruiting employees at 35, which has become the "line of life and death" in the workplace (according to Hualong. com)。 This increasingly prominent "35-year-old phenomenon" in the workplace has sparked heated discussion among netizens.

Those departments and enterprises that set the age of 35 as the "line of life and death" in the workplace have improper practices and are suspected of age discrimination. The Civil Service Law, which came into effect in 2006, only stipulates that the age of civil servants is 18 years old, and there is no upper limit. This follows the legislative rules, not only embodies the legislative intention of not engaging in age discrimination, but also meets the needs of protecting civil rights. It is obviously not in line with the law to stipulate the upper age limit in the recruitment of civil servants.

Chongqing once conducted an online survey on the age limit for recruitment. 8% netizens think it is not discrimination, 43% people say it is discrimination, 23% people think it should be relaxed to 45, and 26% people say they are not interested. It can be seen that 67% of netizens think that the 35-year-old "life and death line" is age discrimination or disagreement.

Public trust. Com -35 cannot be the "line of life and death" in the workplace.

China Net-Delayed retirement is gradually implemented. Netizens suggest canceling the recruitment age limit of 35.