Diploma can represent the topic of knowledge level debate! The more the better! Urgent need! Thank you very much

First of all, we should explain what the diploma is for and why the society should pay attention to it. Although we hate this, a recruiting unit only looks at the diploma and not the ability, but we need to admit that it is reasonable for them to do so. Reading a diploma is an efficient insurance, and the ability needs time to test. Certificates instantly verify a person's strength, without training or internship. Of course, there are also some people who have the ability and potential but have no diploma. But you should know that there are too many people in China, and high efficiency is an issue that cannot be ignored. So by clarifying this truth (I'm just scratching the surface, but this is the direction, and you need to enrich your argument), we first affirmed the existence value of the diploma.

Then there is the question that the other party may raise about "diploma fraud". This is dangerous and needs to be avoided. When there is no way to avoid being mentioned, we should refute its "falsity". Because the question you are discussing is whether a diploma can represent the level of knowledge, not whether a fake diploma can represent the level of knowledge, a fake diploma obviously cannot represent the level of knowledge (don't try to maintain a fake diploma, you will be in a difficult situation). You have to admit this first, and don't wait for the other party to say that the result will give people the illusion that you are questioned. You can use the logic that a white horse is not a horse to say that a fake diploma is not a diploma. Don't admit it, it's troublesome).