Analysis of Human Resources in the Cases of Famous Enterprise Groups

Generally speaking, group questioning is non-professional, which mainly examines the interviewer's analytical ability, logical thinking ability, innovation ability, problem-solving ability and on-the-spot reaction ability (other expression ability and team spirit are not discussed in this part). The so-called guiding ideology, in fact, is nothing else. It is enough that we have been studying philosophy from high school to university.

Dialectics, dichotomy, grasping the main contradiction, the overall situation, the world is constantly changing and developing, and so on. These are all truths that everyone has learned and are easy to understand, but in daily life, even in interviews, it is difficult for us to use these truths to help us analyze problems.

In my experience, in fact, not all the principles will be fully used, as long as we grasp two: global and vertical and horizontal analysis.

1, overall situation

After reading the materials, many students hold on to the last problem to be solved as soon as they open their mouths, and simply talk about their own solutions. In fact, first of all, we should analyze the materials as a whole, and make clear a few questions: what kind of environment and premise the materials are based on, what is the biggest problem in the materials (not necessarily the problem that needs us to discuss and solve, but it may be the root of all problems), the cause and effect of the problems, what is the logical relationship between the two, and what standards we should set to look at the problems.

With logical analysis and standards, I will put forward my own views according to my own analysis and standards. The advantage of doing this is that you can have an overall understanding of the problem, instead of picking up sesame seeds and losing watermelon, you can also show your various abilities to the interviewer.

2. Vertical and horizontal analysis

After a basic analysis of the materials, it is necessary to compete on arguments or viewpoints. In an interview, everyone's views are inevitably the same, but there are still ways to make their views as full as possible.

The following are two examples of group problems of well-known enterprises.

1, Nestle problem:

Debate:

The more choices, the more happiness or the less?

Positive viewpoint analysis:

The more choices, the more happiness.

Transverse analysis:

Faced with this view, we should start with life, food, clothing, housing and transportation to find arguments, school uniforms, canteen dishes, housing unit selection, travel and transportation. The more choices, the better. Divergent to the usual entertainment, such as listening to music before going to bed, the diversity of TV programs and so on. Combined with the current job search, starting from the recruitment enterprises and candidates, the more choices, the better. ...

This kind of horizontal analysis is very useful in the debate, which allows your teammates to demonstrate their views from different angles, so that everyone can have something to say and have the opportunity to express themselves. The performance of the whole team will also give people a sense of unity. It can also help us find arguments quickly and have something to say.

Longitudinal analysis:

This is mainly a question of consciousness, which is easily overlooked. Many times, when expressing opinions, applying this consciousness to supplementary explanations will give people a sense of rigorous thinking. Specifically, your point of view only applies to a local time range, because everything is constantly developing and changing.

2. Vanke problem:

Panel discussion:

The definition of success? Is it successful to become famous in the bristle? Background information: Zhang Ziyi, Hugo.

Transverse analysis:

The definition of success can be divided into two aspects, personal value and social value. Success means different things to different people. Even ordinary people are successful as long as they are satisfied with their work, family and life.

Longitudinal analysis:

The combination of a moment and a lifetime, the brilliance of a moment is not equal to eternity. Even if the person mentioned in the material succeeds, it is temporary, and it cannot be directly judged that this person's success is lifelong.

For case studies, it is generally used for training rather than recruitment. In fact, there is little difference between the case analysis in the interview and the discussion without a leading group, mainly because of the different emphasis. Case analysis will pay more attention to the thinking process and reasons for drawing conclusions.

3. Classic case sharing:

Classic case one:

Maritime rescue (LGD interview questions of the world's top 500)

Now there is a shipwreck. There are eight tourists waiting for rescue on a yacht, but now the helicopter can only save one person at a time. The yacht broke down and it kept leaking. Cold winter, biting sea water.

Tourism information:

1, general, male, 69 years old, battle-hardened;

2. Surgeon, female, 4 1 year old, with exquisite medical skills and noble medical ethics;