The difference of teachers' treatment between private universities and public universities.

There is no difference, treat them equally.

Take Qingdao as an example:

Teachers in private schools will enjoy the same treatment as teachers in public schools, such as social insurance. This institutional barrier that has entangled private education for many years has finally collapsed. On 20 15, Qingdao officially issued "Opinions on Accelerating the Development of Private Education" (hereinafter referred to as "Opinions"), which solved the problem of strengthening the construction of teachers in private schools in many ways.

The "Opinions" clearly put forward for the first time, and launched a pilot program of equal treatment for teachers in private non-profit full-time academic education schools and teachers in public schools. After gaining experience, other types of full-time academic education schools will be established. Teachers of private academic education schools participate in endowment insurance according to the standards of public institutions, and the finance subsidizes the schools according to a certain proportion undertaken by the schools.

At the same time, private non-profit full-time academic education schools can introduce people who meet the requirements of high-level talents in Qingdao, and can be included in the establishment management of public institutions with the approval of the establishment department.

Solving the social insurance problem of teachers in private colleges and universities with reference to the nature of public institutions

The current social insurance payment in Shandong Province is divided into two lines: endowment insurance for government institutions and basic endowment insurance for enterprise employees. Public colleges and universities in our province implement endowment insurance for institutions and institutions, while private colleges and universities provide basic endowment insurance for enterprise employees.

Under two different old-age insurance systems, there is a big gap between retired teachers in private universities and teachers in public universities due to different payment bases, proportions and accounting formulas, resulting in the phenomenon of "different pay for equal work", which not only affects the stability of existing teachers, but also restricts the introduction of potential talents, which is not conducive to the development of teaching quality and connotation construction in private universities.

Hangzhou, Taizhou, Ningbo and other cities in Zhejiang Province, as well as Fujian, Hunan, Jiangxi and other places have successively issued local regulations or policies, which have solved the problem of private college teachers paying fees by reference to institutions.

The medium-and long-term education reform and development plan of the country and Shandong Province both reiterated the need to "vigorously support the development of private education, implement the equal legal status of teachers in private colleges and universities, and establish and improve the social insurance system for teachers in private schools". Therefore, it is suggested that our province introduce relevant local laws and policies so that teachers in private colleges and universities can enjoy the same pension insurance benefits as teachers in public colleges and universities.

Qilu. Teachers in private colleges and universities should enjoy the same pension insurance benefits as teachers in public colleges and universities.

Refer to the above: Bao Qing. Com (Qingdao Daily official website)-Teachers in private schools will be treated equally with public teachers.