Why did R&F win Evergrande but lose to Shanghai?

For the acceptance of this issue, Shen Zhaowei of R&F understands this. He said: "Shanghai, Shanghai and Hong Kong won. Not only do we have defensive problems, but both ends of the offense and defense are not performing well. The coach asked us to attack harder in the second half, but the other side stepped up the defensive counterattack and we didn't respond well. Compared with Evergrande, Shanghai played smarter in the second half and didn't insist on attacking. Instead, choose to defend well and seize your own mistakes to fight back. After the game, the team became too loose, and this game needs to find reasons from its own perspective.

Compared with the competition of Evergrande, the R&F scene has problems in Shanghai and Hong Kong. At Evergrande, R&F's defense was flawed, but they covered up the shortcomings in defense with sharp attack, and finally defeated Evergrande with an efficiency of 5: 4. However, in addition to attacking Hong Kong, R&F was completely suppressed by Shanghai in the second half except for the initial fierce attack. Why is the gap so big? This is not because R&F's attack is not enough, but because R&F's attack hit Evergrande's unguarded counterattack tactics, and they can make full use of this. However, when they met the defensive counter-attack tactics of Shanghai Port, they completely collapsed. This is the real reason why R&F won Evergrande but lost to Shanghai. Regardless of the strength of Evergrande and Shanghai Port, only the tactics of the coaches of the two sides are different. At least in terms of R&F's tactical choice, Pereira is more pragmatic and smarter than Cannavaro.