Is Yangtze Design Group’s recruitment worth recommending?

Highly recommended.

To be honest, after I saw the recruitment announcement of Changjiang Design Group, I was not excited at all about this unit’s avant-garde behavior of “disclosing the relationship between the applicant and the leader of the applicant unit, and actively accepting social supervision” , on the contrary, it is deeper despair. Under the current recruitment methods of state-owned enterprises, "children of leaders and children of non-leaders compete for recruitment in the same field." Is there anything doubtful about the results?

Generally speaking, people who can be leaders prove that they have high qualities. The generous family conditions of leaders can provide better educational security for their children. In comparison, their children have a higher probability of becoming talented. The situation around me seems to prove this conclusion. As the old saying goes, a dragon begets a dragon, a phoenix begets a phoenix, and a mouse's son burrows in the ground. It contains certain dialectical truths.

Objectively speaking, there is nothing surprising if the children of leaders appear on the list of candidates to be hired. By virtue of his strength, this person stands out. Even for an important state-owned enterprise like Yangtze River Design Group, the children of leaders happen to appear on the list of candidates to be hired by the leader's unit. In addition to envy, ordinary people should not be jealous or hateful.

This is of course the good wish of ordinary people and the rational thinking of ignorant people. Objectively speaking, it cannot be wrong. But this desire and rationality must be based on the excellence of the leaders' children and on the relatively fair recruitment of the leadership units. Without these two foundations, still insisting on such desire and rationality must be self-deception.

However, unfortunately, these two foundations are extremely fragile and unreliable, and they cannot support people's kindness. Because leaders' children are generally excellent, it does not mean that "leaders' children are excellent", and the fairness of recruitment in state-owned enterprises has not been generally recognized by people at this stage. Concession and greetings are done behind the scenes, but it is a routine operation. Every time the issue of recruitment fairness stirs up people's sensitive nerves.

As you can imagine, how could such a fragile foundation not arouse all kinds of doubts among people? In this case, when the relationship between the candidate and the leader is disclosed, the first thing people feel is not the courage and responsibility of the recruiting unit to set the trend, but the first thing people feel is that the recruiting unit is willing to abandon me and others have nothing to fear. A domineering and tough style. I don’t know what other people think, but I felt a chill from the announcement. This is not like a public notice for social supervision, it is simply a green pass!

The recruitment of Yangtze River Design Group has basically been settled. If nothing else happens, the leaders’ children will join the company quickly and smoothly. The voice of social doubt will not make recruitment happen again. To quell the supervisors’ doubts, the recruiting unit needs to disclose more real evidence. If this matter ends quietly like this, then what else will this so-called "progress" in recruiting by "disclosing the relationship with the leadership" leave people in despair?