Urgent! Kneel down! How to answer the street office interview? Good people, help! (Online, etc ...)

When asking this question, the examiner is mostly asking if you are the kind of person who has other plans for street work. If so, he or she will not be interested in you. They want to find someone who wants to solve problems at work. They have reason to think that such people work harder and are more efficient.

How to answer such questions by breaking through skills? You'd better know in advance which jobs in the street office are suitable for your skills and interests. For example, the advantages of computers are suitable for this job. This is very important. To answer this question, you should talk about your motivation for choosing a job goal, the skills required for that job, all kinds of specialized training, or academic certificates related to the position.

This question actually has two meanings. First, why did you choose the street office? Second, why did you choose the street office? If you have a reason to choose this position, or if choosing this position is your greatest wish, you should be prepared to answer why. If possible, you should know it as far in advance as possible before the interview. Contact others for detailed information, or go to the library to check. Any way to keep you informed is necessary.

I have spent a lot of time thinking about the possibilities of various occupations, and I think this job is the best for me, because I am good at many skills required in this job. For example, analyzing and solving problems is my strong point. In my previous job, I was able to find and solve problems earlier than others. Once ... the position you offered seems to be a place where I can develop my problem-solving ability. If I work hard here and prove my value, I think I have a chance to develop with your company.

This kind of answer can be "providing evidence".

②: Whether you are competent or not, you must be sure. If you can't, don't come to the interview. Then you should highlight your advantages and the matching degree between your advantages and your career. And advantages that others don't have. For example, your professional advantages, your character strengths, your unique skills, such as writing ability or thinking logic, execution, expressive power and so on.

In fact, the three questions you listed are all repetitive, asking about advantages, so the examiner may ask you about disadvantages directly. At this time, don't really talk about your shortcomings, such as what major is not solid. You can say something else, for example, you are a fresh student with insufficient work experience, but what efforts have you made, such as internship experience and practical experience.

④: First of all, we should attach importance to people-oriented, realize that no matter how small the masses are, it is also a major event, and put the interests of the masses first. Sub-district offices should think more about the people, serve the people, serve the people wholeheartedly, and put the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the people first. . . . Then continue to brag, and then start to say what you want to do. I will first stabilize the petitioner's mood, let him speak slowly, don't get excited, and listen carefully to the petitioners' complaints. The so-called petition means that the people are dissatisfied with the government's work and complain to the petition department at a higher level. Finally, after listening, judge according to your own ability. Have the ability to let the lower level make a decision that satisfies the petitioners, and you directly notify the order; If there is no ability, report to the relevant leaders and competent leaders; If the problem of the complainant does not belong to your jurisdiction, it shall be handed over to the relevant departments for handling; If the petitioner's petition request violates laws and regulations or the original decision-making organ has no mistakes, you should patiently explain and give the petitioner a satisfactory answer. In short, it is to satisfy the petitioners.