How to treat a family with half a bucket of food instead of being the king of children? This is the question of this year's teacher recruitment interview. What would you do?

Haha, the answer upstairs is really classic! After reading so many Baidu answers, your answer should be the most irrelevant! I believe that the respondents are only minors and may be students at school.

Landlord, let me repeat:

I believe the landlord knows what it means to "have half a bucket of grain at home and not be a king of the children"? Ok, I'll give you a rough idea, which means: as long as your family is not very poor and forced, you won't choose to be a teacher (if you still have a chance to see those upstairs, please compare them and don't mislead others to harm them).

If I encounter this question in the interview, I will answer it roughly like this:

1. I haven't heard this sentence. I don't know if it's an old saying or a popular professional saying.

2. The reason why I chose the profession of teacher (for example, I love children, my family is a family of teachers, and I like education very much, etc. ) is to tell the examiner that I chose the profession of teacher not because of the salary, but because I like it, love it and am willing to pay for it, even if the salary is meager (maybe against my will).

Since there is such a statement, it shows that the salary of teachers in this school is not high. Since the salary is not high, we can find ways to raise it. Now is the economic society. Enterprises and schools can jointly set up factories and run enterprises, increase revenue and reduce expenditure, develop the economy in combination with local resources, and guide local economic development. For example, if there is an agricultural major in vocational secondary schools, you can contract to plant fruit trees and vegetables on the mountains.

Strange, has the original answer upstairs been deleted?