The topic of "conscription violence" was hotly debated by netizens. What kind of recruitment violence have you encountered?

What does it mean that the topic of recruitment violence is hotly discussed by netizens? Simply put, it is all kinds of unfair treatment encountered in recruitment and the incredible conditions put forward by the other party. It is estimated that you have met some great interviewers and some great companies when recruiting, which counts.

Some people pay attention to selfless dedication. Our basic salary is very low, 500,800,2000, but we have achievements. We can't figure out how this company can be confident that the basic salary of its employees should be higher than the local minimum wage. This is the requirement of labor law. As long as I am an employee of this company, the company will ensure that my monthly income is higher than the minimum wage. If it is lower than this standard, it is illegal. It may be said that you don't know, you won't report him, and you won't apply for labor arbitration, but you won if you don't know.

I will also ask you about your private life, such as where you live and which companies you have worked in before. It's normal to know this, but he wants to know which clients you worked for in that company before. As we all know, when you leave your last company, your customer relationship will also be handed over, because it belongs to the company. If it is found out by the original company, it will bear legal responsibility, because there was a confidentiality agreement at that time.

At the time of recruitment, this kind of thing happened more than once, especially the hr remarks that failed to get into the undergraduate course were all IQ problems. As far as the brain is concerned, because as an interviewer of an enterprise, you can feel that you don't accept it. This is your freedom, and you can rule it out, but you can't say that failing the undergraduate course is an IQ problem. Once this topic is brewed, it is the best.

Anyway, all kinds of companies are doing some fancy things, and the core is to contribute to the company around you. How much income do you want to create for the company first, and then how much salary you can give. I think this is all hooliganism. I go to the company to make money. Don't tell me about your contribution to the company. If I can't solve the most basic life problems, it's meaningless, because the risk brought to the company is the criterion to decide whether an employee is promoted or not.